Literature DB >> 22986957

Effect of bolus volume and viscosity on pharyngeal automated impedance manometry variables derived for broad Dysphagia patients.

Taher I Omari1, Eddy Dejaeger, Jan Tack, Dirk Van Beckevoort, Nathalie Rommel.   

Abstract

Automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis measures swallow variables defining bolus timing, pressure, contractile vigour, and bolus presence, which are combined to derive a swallow risk index (SRI) correlating with aspiration. In a heterogeneous cohort of dysphagia patients, we assessed the impact of bolus volume and viscosity on AIM variables. We studied 40 patients (average age = 46 years). Swallowing of boluses was recorded with manometry, impedance, and videofluoroscopy. AIMplot software was used to derive functional variables: peak pressure (PeakP), pressure at nadir impedance (PNadImp), time from nadir impedance to peak pressure (TNadImp-PeakP), the interval of impedance drop in the distal pharynx (flow interval, FI), upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation interval (UES RI), nadir UES pressure (Nad UESP), UES intrabolus pressure (UES IBP), and UES resistance. The SRI was derived using the formula SRI = (FI * PNadImp)/(PeakP * (TNadImp-PeakP + 1)) * 100. A total of 173 liquid, 44 semisolid, and 33 solid boluses were analysed. The SRI was elevated in relation to aspiration. PeakP increased with volume. SRI was not significantly altered by bolus volume. PNadImp, UES IBP, and UES resistance increased with viscosity. SRI was lower with increased viscosity. In patients with dysphagia, the SRI is elevated in relation to aspiration, reduced by bolus viscosity, and not affected by bolus volume. These data provide evidence that pharyngeal AIM analysis may have clinical utility for assessing deglutitive aspiration risk to liquid boluses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986957     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-012-9423-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  13 in total

1.  Radial asymmetry of the upper oesophageal sphincter pressure profile: fact or artefact.

Authors:  E Bardan; M Kern; S Torrico; R C Arndorfer; B T Massey; R Shaker
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Effects of age, gender, bolus condition, viscosity, and volume on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressure and temporal measurements during swallowing.

Authors:  Susan G Butler; Andrew Stuart; Donald Castell; Gregory B Russell; Kenneth Koch; Shannon Kemp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Reproducibility and agreement of pharyngeal automated impedance manometry with videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Athanasios Papathanasopoulos; Eddy Dejaeger; Lucas Wauters; Emidio Scarpellini; Rita Vos; Sarah Slootmaekers; Veerle Seghers; Liesbeth Cornelissen; Ann Goeleven; Jan Tack; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  A penetration-aspiration scale.

Authors:  J C Rosenbek; J A Robbins; E B Roecker; J L Coyle; J L Wood
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.052

6.  A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Eddy Dejaeger; Dirk van Beckevoort; Ann Goeleven; Geoffrey P Davidson; John Dent; Jan Tack; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Pharyngeal flow interval: a novel impedance-based parameter correlating with aspiration.

Authors:  L Noll; N Rommel; G P Davidson; T I Omari
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Pharyngeal swallow adaptations to bolus volume measured with high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Michelle R Ciucci; Jason D Mielens; Jack J Jiang; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment outcome in inflammatory myopathy presenting as oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  R B Williams; M J Grehan; M Hersch; J Andre; I J Cook
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Biomechanics of failed deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation in neurogenic dysphagia.

Authors:  Rohan B H Williams; Karen L Wallace; Galib N Ali; Ian J Cook
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.052

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  New insights in gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal function and gastric emptying in relation to dysphagia before and after anti-reflux surgery in children.

Authors:  M J Smits; C M Loots; M A Benninga; T I Omari; M P van Wijk
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem.

Authors:  Pere Clavé; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Differential Response Pattern of Oropharyngeal Pressure by Bolus and Dry Swallows.

Authors:  Mana Hasegawa; Masayuki Kurose; Keiichiro Okamoto; Yoshiaki Yamada; Takanori Tsujimura; Makoto Inoue; Taisuke Sato; Takatsune Narumi; Noritaka Fujii; Kensuke Yamamura
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 5.  Oropharyngeal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Nathalie Rommel; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry and Impedance: Protocols and Metrics-Recommendations of a High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Michelle Ciucci; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Ester Hernández; Katherine Hutcheson; Corinne Jones; Julia Maclean; Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Emily Plowman; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Nathalie Rommel; Ashli O'Rourke
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Reduced pharyngeal constriction is associated with impaired swallowing efficiency in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).

Authors:  Ashley A Waito; Lauren C Tabor-Gray; Catriona M Steele; Emily K Plowman
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Derivation and measurement consistency of a novel biofluid dynamics measure of deglutitive bolus-driving function-pharyngeal swallowing power.

Authors:  Isaac Sia; Michael A Crary; John Kairalla; Giselle D Carnaby; Mark Sheplak; Timothy McCulloch
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Pressure topography metrics for high-resolution pharyngeal-esophageal manofluorography-a normative study of younger and older adults.

Authors:  N Nativ-Zeltzer; J A Logemann; S G Zecker; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Swallow Safety is Determined by Bolus Volume During Infant Feeding in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Christopher J Mayerl; Alexis M Myrla; Francois D H Gould; Laura E Bond; Bethany M Stricklen; Rebecca Z German
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.