Literature DB >> 23438253

Do pre-operative knee laxity values influence post-operative ones after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

C Signorelli1, T Bonanzinga, N Lopomo, G M Marcheggiani Muccioli, S Bignozzi, G Filardo, S Zaffagnini, M Marcacci.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to verify whether pre-reconstruction laxity condition effects post-reconstruction outcome. A total of 100 patients who underwent navigated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction were included in the study and knee laxity analysed retrospectively. The knee was assessed in six different laxity tests before and after ACL reconstruction, namely antero-posterior (AP) and internal-external (IE) at 30° and 90°, and varus-valgus (VV) rotations at 0° and 30° of flexion. For each test, the least square (LS) fitting line based on pre-operative-to-post-operative laxity value was calculated. To what degree the post-operative laxity value is explainable by the corresponding pre-operative condition was evaluated by the LS line slope. Post-operatively, for each single patient, the grade of laxity decreased at any evaluated test. The strongest influence of pre-operative-to-post-operative laxity values was found during IE30 and IE90 tests. While AP30 and VV0 tests seem to be those in which the post-reconstruction laxity was barely affected by the pre-surgery condition. The analysis of the global laxity reduction confirms the previous results. Following this hypothesis, our study remarks on the importance of combined lesions to secondary restraints and the importance of fully understanding the residual laxity to optimize the surgical technique.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; kinematics tests; laxity; surgical navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23438253     DOI: 10.1111/sms.12059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  14 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation: predictors of functional outcome.

Authors:  Francesco Della Villa; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Perdisa; Giuseppe Filardo; Jacopo Gamberini; Daniele Caminati; Stefano Della Villa
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-31

2.  ACL rupture and joint laxity progression: a quantitative in vivo analysis.

Authors:  C Signorelli; G Filardo; T Bonanzinga; A Grassi; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Risk factors for residual pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the MAKS group.

Authors:  Hiroko Ueki; Yusuke Nakagawa; Toshiyuki Ohara; Toshifumi Watanabe; Masafumi Horie; Hiroki Katagiri; Koji Otabe; Kenta Katagiri; Kanehiro Hiyama; Mai Katakura; Takashi Hoshino; Kei Inomata; Naoko Araya; Ichiro Sekiya; Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Can rotatory knee laxity be predicted in isolated anterior cruciate ligament surgery?

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Maria Pia Neri; Andrea Visani; Maurilio Marcacci; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Francesca de Caro; Luca Andriolo; Elizaveta Kon; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Technical variables of ACL surgical reconstruction: effect on post-operative static laxity and clinical implication.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; C Signorelli; T Bonanzinga; T Roberti Di Sarsina; A Grassi; A Budeyri; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; F Raggi; L Bragonzoni; N Lopomo; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Contributions of the anterolateral complex and the anterolateral ligament to rotatory knee stability in the setting of ACL Injury: a roundtable discussion.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Alan Getgood; Philippe Neyret; Steven Claes; Jeremy M Burnham; Cecile Batailler; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Andy Williams; Andrew Amis; Stefano Zaffagnini; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Double-bundle revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is effective in rescuing failed primary reconstruction and re-introducing patients to physical exercise.

Authors:  Changqing Jiang; Guofei Chen; Peng Chen; Wei Li; Honglei Zhang; Wentao Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Alberto Grassi; Margherita Serra; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.