Literature DB >> 26821214

Magnetic Propulsion of Microswimmers with DNA-Based Flagellar Bundles.

Alexander M Maier1, Cornelius Weig2, Peter Oswald3, Erwin Frey2, Peer Fischer3,4, Tim Liedl1.   

Abstract

We show that DNA-based self-assembly can serve as a general and flexible tool to construct artificial flagella of several micrometers in length and only tens of nanometers in diameter. By attaching the DNA flagella to biocompatible magnetic microparticles, we provide a proof of concept demonstration of hybrid structures that, when rotated in an external magnetic field, propel by means of a flagellar bundle, similar to self-propelling peritrichous bacteria. Our theoretical analysis predicts that flagellar bundles that possess a length-dependent bending stiffness should exhibit a superior swimming speed compared to swimmers with a single appendage. The DNA self-assembly method permits the realization of these improved flagellar bundles in good agreement with our quantitative model. DNA flagella with well-controlled shape could fundamentally increase the functionality of fully biocompatible nanorobots and extend the scope and complexity of active materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA self-assembly; Propulsion; flagella; low-Reynolds-number; nanorobots; slender-body theory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26821214      PMCID: PMC4819949          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


Many motile micro-organisms possess flagella to propel[1] or swim[2] through viscous fluids.[3] Mimicking these highly evolved microstructures with nanoscale features is challenging but would enable the realization of functional microswimmers.[4,5] Artificial flagella have been constructed from various materials, such as alloys and glass, with sizes ranging from a few millimeters down to several hundreds of nanometers using top-down fabrication methods.[6−10] A prominent example of a self-assembled swimmer was demonstrated by linking magnetic particles while an applied magnetic field induces the formation of particle chains.[11] For the actuation of such artificial flagella, externally applied magnetic fields have proven to be advantageous as they are fully biocompatible and can be applied in aqueous environments from afar, avoiding the need for potentially toxic chemical reactions commonly used to propel phoretic swimmers.[12] Within these approaches, miniaturization to the nanoscale,[9] complex maneuvering,[6] functionalization for targeted drug delivery,[10,13] large scale production,[6,8,9] and a certain degree of biocompatibility[8] were shown. However, for future applications it is desirable to develop more versatile and naturally biocompatible means of realizing artificial flagella with the potential to mimic the complex hierarchically assembled protein structure of real flagella while ideally combining all of the above-mentioned features in one single system. DNA-based self-assembly[14−16] can meet these requirements as it allows for systematic design at the nanoscale, large-scale production and straightforward functionalization, while being fully biocompatible. We show that even isotropically covered spherical particles of 1 μm in diameter can be propelled by virtue of hydrodynamically formed DNA flagellar bundles. Interestingly, compared to swimmers with a single appendage,[17] our bundles exhibit a stiffness profile that is shown to underlie favorable swimming shapes that can also be found in flagellar bundles of bacteria. To realize artificial flagella, we employed DNA tile-tube assembly[14,18] schematically depicted in Figure . In this technique, short single-stranded DNA fragments assemble into n-helix tubes (nHT) (Figure a), where each tube consists of repeating structural units of n adjacent DNA duplexes, which can polymerize along the axis of the tube. From a large variety of possible tube types (Supporting Information Figure S1), three designs with varying degree of twist and stiffness are shown in Figure b: straight 8-helix-tubes (st8HT), twisted[18,19] 8-helix tubes (tw8HT), and supertwisted[20] 13-helix tubes (stw13HT). The tubes were attached to 1 μm iron oxide particles via the hybridization of complementary DNA strands (Figure c) (for design details see Supporting Information Note S1). For imaging and tracking, a subset of the DNA strands forming the tubes were modified with Cy3 dyes on their 5′ ends. All three types of the tubes (Figure d–f) and their respective hybrid structures (Figure g-i) were imaged in a liquid cell of a few micrometers in height. Remarkably, the hybrids visually resembled flagellated bacteria, were similar in size, and possessed equal amounts of twist as natural flagella. For example, the stw13HT (Figure f,i) had a pitch of 2.51 ± 0.51 μm and a diameter of 0.57 ± 0.19 μm, which compares well to an E. coli filament in its normal form, whereas the tw8HT (Figure e,h) had a pitch of 0.98 ± 0.22 μm and a diameter of 0.30 ± 0.17 μm, which resembles the curly state of the E. coli.[21]
Figure 1

DNA tile-tube–magnetic bead hybrids. (a) Schematic showing the self-assembly of single DNA strands into DNA tile-tube structures consisting of n double helices and (b) the design of straight 8-helix (st8HT), twisted 8-helix (tw8HT), and supertwisted 13-helix (stw13HT) tile-tubes. (c) Attachment of tile-tubes to DNA-modified magnetic beads via biotin–streptavidin coupling yields DNA tile-tube–magnetic bead hybrids. (d–i) Fluorescence microscopy images showing (d) st8HT, (e) tw8HT, and (f) stw13HT, and 1 μm magnetic beads decorated with (g) st8HT, (h) tw8HT, and (i) stw13HT. The demonstrated hybrid structures have only a few artificial flagella attached to facilitate a simultaneous visualization of the magnetic bead and the tile-tubes. Tw8Hts in (e) and (h) were imaged in 75% glycerol to slow down thermal fluctuations, which here also increased the twist diameter. Swimming motions were examined in glycerol-free solutions. Also, note that due to their brightness the magnetic beads appear larger than their actual size of 1 μm. Scale bars: 1 μm.

DNA tile-tube–magnetic bead hybrids. (a) Schematic showing the self-assembly of single DNA strands into DNA tile-tube structures consisting of n double helices and (b) the design of straight 8-helix (st8HT), twisted 8-helix (tw8HT), and supertwisted 13-helix (stw13HT) tile-tubes. (c) Attachment of tile-tubes to DNA-modified magnetic beads via biotin–streptavidin coupling yields DNA tile-tube–magnetic bead hybrids. (d–i) Fluorescence microscopy images showing (d) st8HT, (e) tw8HT, and (f) stw13HT, and 1 μm magnetic beads decorated with (g) st8HT, (h) tw8HT, and (i) stw13HT. The demonstrated hybrid structures have only a few artificial flagella attached to facilitate a simultaneous visualization of the magnetic bead and the tile-tubes. Tw8Hts in (e) and (h) were imaged in 75% glycerol to slow down thermal fluctuations, which here also increased the twist diameter. Swimming motions were examined in glycerol-free solutions. Also, note that due to their brightness the magnetic beads appear larger than their actual size of 1 μm. Scale bars: 1 μm. To test the ability of the DNA-flagellated magnetic particle hybrids to propel at low Reynolds number, we externally applied a rotating homogeneous magnetic field. Magnetic beads can also be pulled by a magnetic gradient field, however, it is generally not viable to achieve significant gradients at a distance, and so homogeneous (nongradient) fields are much more practical for potential applications. The samples were placed in the center of a three-axis Helmholtz coil system that was integrated into an inverted fluorescence microscope (Supporting Information Note S2). The hybrids were exposed to rotating homogeneous magnetic fields of up to 100 G, and their motion was captured on video. Video samples containing hybrid structures (displayed in Figure g–i) revealed that all the particles rotated in phase and approximately 10% of the st8HTs and tw8HTs decorated structures formed a bundle of DNA flagella on only one side of the bead (see Figure a and Supporting Information Video 1 for a well-assembled structure and Supporting Information Figure S7 for non-functional side products). Because we did not observe a qualitative difference in the bundle structure of st8HTs, tw8HTs, and stw13HT-bundles (see Supporting Information Figure S8 and S9), and since stw13HT formed with a yield of only ∼1%, we limited our study to the tw8HT-bundle swimmers. Figure a shows eight snapshots of a tw8HTs decorated 1 μm magnetic particle during one full rotation. Similar to real bacterial flagella, upon rotation the DNA flagella formed a hydrodynamically assembled corkscrew-like bundle with a length of several micrometers. The rotated tube bundle propelled the DNA–magnetic bead hybrids (see Figure b and Supporting Information Video 2) head first along the rotation axis. The propulsion speed of up to 1/10 of a body length per turn (along the rotation axis) is in good agreement with the dimensionless speed (body lengths per turn) of flagellated bacteria, although bacteria swim at higher frequencies and therefore effectively propel much faster. The fastest artificial swimmer observed was driven at 3 Hz and propelled with a speed of ∼0.6 μm/s (see Supporting Information Figure S6). At higher frequencies, the DNA flagellar bundles lost their corkscrew-like form, which led to a decreased speed (see Supporting Information Video 3). This divergent behavior from bacterial flagellation can be explained by the smaller persistence length of the DNA tube-based flagellum (∼8 μm for 8HT[20]) in comparison to that of bacteria (∼0.7 mm for E. coli(22)). For higher-frequency swimmers, one would therefore have to employ a more rigid DNA flagella design. Higher flagella rigidity could also allow for observing differences in swimming speeds of (super)twisted and straight flagella. An additional movement perpendicular to the rotation axis has been observed in most swimmers and can be attributed to hydrodynamic interactions of the swimmer with the surface of the fluid-cell. This is analogous to the motion of bacteria in the vicinity of glass surfaces, where the same effect has been reported.[23] By gradually changing the rotation axis of the external magnetic field, the DNA–magnetic bead hybrids could also be steered to follow a curved path (Figure c and Supporting Information Video 4). In contrast to a bacterial flagellar bundle, the artificial bundle did not reopen when switching the rotation from clockwise to counterclockwise or vice versa, which would permit the observation of run-and-tumble behavior. Instead, the artificial swimmers retained their overall swimming direction, while the movement perpendicular to the rotation axis reversed every time the field was switched (Supporting Information Video 5). The continuous forward propulsion is direct evidence for a change of the bundle’s helicity, as in a static helix a reversal of the direction of rotation would lead to reversal of the swimming direction. From these two observations, no reopening and switch of helicity of the DNA-tube bundles upon reversal of rotation direction, we conclude that the individual tubes cross-link weakly during bundle formation (tight cross-linking would lead to static helicity and no cross-linking would allow bundles to reopen). Cross-linking could be a result of possible domain exchanges between adjacent tubes within the bundle. We further observed an exponential drop of the fluorescence intensity along the tube bundle (Figure a and Supporting Information Figure S7), which we can attribute to an exponential decay in the length distribution of the bundled DNA tubes.[14] Interestingly, also naturally occurring bundles of flagella often exhibit thinning toward the bundles’ end. This raises the question whether the varying lengths of flagella within our artificial bundle has an effect on the swimming speed.
Figure 2

Directed motion of DNA-flagellated magnetic bead hybrids. (a) Schematic and respective fluorescence microscopy images of a tw8HT hybrid structure driven by a homogeneous magnetic field, which rotates perpendicular to the swimming direction. (b,c) Superimposed images of the tracking of DNA-flagellated magnetic bead hybrids (b) in directed motion and (c) following a curved path. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Figure 3

Analysis of a DNA tile-tube bundle. (a) The fluorescence intensity of an artificial flagellar bundle (inset) drops exponentially (red dashed line) when moving away from the bead due to a decreasing number of tubes in the bundle. Data was gained by averaging over several movie frames to rule out errors emerging from a change in the fluorescence distribution along the particle during rotation (see Supporting Information Figure S7 for additional bundle analysis). The fluorescence decay length of the demonstrated swimmer is 3 μm. (b) Numerical solutions of the shape of one stiff (top) and floppy (middle) bundle with constant bending stiffness in comparison to a bundle with decreasing stiffness (bottom) at eight positions during one full rotation. (c) Within the theoretical model, swimmers with decreasing stiffness of the bundle (solid lines) achieve a higher speed than swimmers with constant stiffness of the bundle (dashed lines) for a broad range of bundle lengths and stiffnesses.

Directed motion of DNA-flagellated magnetic bead hybrids. (a) Schematic and respective fluorescence microscopy images of a tw8HT hybrid structure driven by a homogeneous magnetic field, which rotates perpendicular to the swimming direction. (b,c) Superimposed images of the tracking of DNA-flagellated magnetic bead hybrids (b) in directed motion and (c) following a curved path. Scale bars: 10 μm. Analysis of a DNA tile-tube bundle. (a) The fluorescence intensity of an artificial flagellar bundle (inset) drops exponentially (red dashed line) when moving away from the bead due to a decreasing number of tubes in the bundle. Data was gained by averaging over several movie frames to rule out errors emerging from a change in the fluorescence distribution along the particle during rotation (see Supporting Information Figure S7 for additional bundle analysis). The fluorescence decay length of the demonstrated swimmer is 3 μm. (b) Numerical solutions of the shape of one stiff (top) and floppy (middle) bundle with constant bending stiffness in comparison to a bundle with decreasing stiffness (bottom) at eight positions during one full rotation. (c) Within the theoretical model, swimmers with decreasing stiffness of the bundle (solid lines) achieve a higher speed than swimmers with constant stiffness of the bundle (dashed lines) for a broad range of bundle lengths and stiffnesses. To address this question, we modeled the bundle of tubes as a single appendage with a length-dependent bending modulus. This approach is reasonable, as the DNA tubes in the bundle are only weakly cross-linked, such that the effective stiffness is to a good approximation proportional to the number of tubes present at the respective bundle position.[24−26] If a polymerization process with sufficient supply of monomer units is assumed during the growth phase of the DNA filaments, the expected length distribution of free filaments falls exponentially.[27] Accordingly, the fluorescence intensity of the bundles in our experiments decreases exponentially toward their tails [see Figure and Supporting Information Figure S10]. We thus infer an exponentially decreasing number of filaments in the bundles and an analogous decrease in their bending stiffness from head to tail. In general, the equation of motion of a bundle in a viscous medium at low Reynolds number is given by the force balance of the anisotropic friction on the tube bundle[28,29] Γ with the elastic forces due to the bending of the bundle,Here, u⃗ is the local velocity of the bundle, A is the local bending stiffness, r⃗ is the bundle position and σ a Lagrange multiplier ensuring inextensibility. All variables depend on the arc length position s along the bundle. We solved this equation by generalizing previous work on actuated swimmers[17] using boundary conditions taking into account that the bundle is attached to a rotating bead (Supporting Information Note S3). The crucial difference to earlier works,[17] however, is that in our case the bending stiffness A(s) changes along the bundle, which extends the scope of our model to bundles of variable stiffness. At low Reynolds numbers, swimming requires a swimming stroke that is not time-reversible.[3] Therefore, a rotating straight passive bundle needs to bend into a chiral shape to generate propulsion. The propulsion efficiency then depends on the curvature and the beat amplitude of this induced shape. In order to ascertain how well our bundle of variable stiffness meets these requirements, we compared it to the cases of constant high and low bending stiffness. Figure b shows that constant high stiffness (top) achieves high amplitudes but lacks bending especially toward the end of the bundle. In contrast, a constant low stiffness (middle) permits bending but lacks beat amplitude. A bundle with variable stiffness (bottom), however, can achieve both large amplitudes and bending along the entire length of the bundle (see also Supporting Information Video 6). Figure c shows a comparison of the swimming speed as a function of bundle length for bundles of decreasing stiffness (solid), and bundles of constant stiffness (dashed) comprising 1, 6, 20, and 50 tubes. Remarkably, the swimming speed of the variable stiffness swimmer is faster for nearly all parameters. In other words, a bead with a bundle of multiple tubes of different lengths surpasses one with the same number of equal-length tubes, which is a feature that arises naturally in our method of construction. Finally, we tested our theoretical model by comparing the predicted and the observed swimming speeds of 10 individual tw8HT-bundle swimmers (Figure ). The solutions from the model allowed us to predict the swimming speed of a swimmer from its geometric parameters, which we determined for each swimmer from the experimental data. The so predicted swimming speeds differed by less than 40% from the observed speed. Differences between the model and the observations are attributed to errors in determining some of the parameters that enter the model (see Supporting Information Note S3) as well as to neglecting the additional drag, which arises in the vicinity of the glass surface. Despite these differences, our observations agree remarkably well with the quantitative predictions from the model.
Figure 4

Comparison of simulated and measured swimming speeds. Measured speeds (orange) of 10 different DNA - magnetic bead hybrid swimmers (inlets) in comparison to the simulated values (gray) that were obtained for the respective swimmer. All swimmers were rotated with a frequency of 1 Hz. The swimmers were selected for their constant swimming behavior throughout the measurement from a pool of 40 swimmers depicted in Supporting Information Figure S6.

Comparison of simulated and measured swimming speeds. Measured speeds (orange) of 10 different DNA - magnetic bead hybrid swimmers (inlets) in comparison to the simulated values (gray) that were obtained for the respective swimmer. All swimmers were rotated with a frequency of 1 Hz. The swimmers were selected for their constant swimming behavior throughout the measurement from a pool of 40 swimmers depicted in Supporting Information Figure S6. Our general and flexible self-assembly scheme allows constructing biocompatible artificial flagella of comparable size to small bacteria and in large numbers. Coupling of DNA-tubes to magnetic beads results in hybrid structures that swim by means of a flagellar bundle when actuated by an external magnetic field, which also allows for complex maneuvering. Our quantitative model reveals that our artificial and bacterial flagellar bundles whose stiffness decreases toward their ends achieve an improved speed compared to bundles with homogeneous rigidity. Design rules derived from the theoretical model can be applied in future experiments to optimize the swimmers to reach even higher speeds. To better understand and improve the assembly process of our artificial flagella, real-time bundle formation dynamics could be studied using magnetic tweezers, which can trap and rotate the swimmers in solution with no interfering glass surface nearby. If unfolding of the bundle can be achieved, further insights into run-and-tumble[30] and swimming strategies used by microorganisms can be gained. Our method demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of DNA self-assembly techniques for the construction of new microswimmer and nanorobot[31,32] designs, including hierarchically assembled fully biocompatible soft materials that are difficult to realize with other fabrication methods.
  26 in total

1.  Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments.

Authors:  L Turner; W S Ryu; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Microscopic artificial swimmers.

Authors:  Rémi Dreyfus; Jean Baudry; Marcus L Roper; Marc Fermigier; Howard A Stone; Jérôme Bibette
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries.

Authors:  Eric Lauga; Willow R DiLuzio; George M Whitesides; Howard A Stone
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Actin-binding proteins sensitively mediate F-actin bundle stiffness.

Authors:  Mireille M A E Claessens; Mark Bathe; Erwin Frey; Andreas R Bausch
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns.

Authors:  Paul W K Rothemund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Bioinspired helical microswimmers based on vascular plants.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Xiaomiao Feng; Allen Pei; Christopher R Kane; Ryan Tam; Camille Hennessy; Joseph Wang
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Artificial bacterial flagella for remote-controlled targeted single-cell drug delivery.

Authors:  Rami Mhanna; Famin Qiu; Li Zhang; Yun Ding; Kaori Sugihara; Marcy Zenobi-Wong; Bradley J Nelson
Journal:  Small       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 13.281

8.  Nanopropellers and their actuation in complex viscoelastic media.

Authors:  Debora Schamel; Andrew G Mark; John G Gibbs; Cornelia Miksch; Konstantin I Morozov; Alexander M Leshansky; Peer Fischer
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Bacteria swim by rotating their flagellar filaments.

Authors:  H C Berg; R A Anderson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Rotation-induced polymorphic transitions in bacterial flagella.

Authors:  Reinhard Vogel; Holger Stark
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Building machines with DNA molecules.

Authors:  Hamid Ramezani; Hendrik Dietz
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  DNA origami nano-mechanics.

Authors:  Jiahao Ji; Deepak Karna; Hanbin Mao
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 3.  Nanoswimmers Based on Capped Janus Nanospheres.

Authors:  Petteri Piskunen; Martina Huusela; Veikko Linko
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Self-Assembled DNA Tubes Forming Helices of Controlled Diameter and Chirality.

Authors:  Alexander Mario Maier; Wooli Bae; Daniel Schiffels; Johannes Friedrich Emmerig; Maximilian Schiff; Tim Liedl
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Fabrication and Manipulation of Ciliary Microrobots with Non-reciprocal Magnetic Actuation.

Authors:  Sangwon Kim; Seungmin Lee; Jeonghun Lee; Bradley J Nelson; Li Zhang; Hongsoo Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Fission and fusion scenarios for magnetic microswimmer clusters.

Authors:  Francisca Guzmán-Lastra; Andreas Kaiser; Hartmut Löwen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Real-time magnetic actuation of DNA nanodevices via modular integration with stiff micro-levers.

Authors:  Stephanie Lauback; Kara R Mattioli; Alexander E Marras; Maxim Armstrong; Thomas P Rudibaugh; Ratnasingham Sooryakumar; Carlos E Castro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Biodegradable Hybrid Stomatocyte Nanomotors for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Yingfeng Tu; Fei Peng; Alain A M André; Yongjun Men; Mangala Srinivas; Daniela A Wilson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Magnetically controlled ferromagnetic swimmers.

Authors:  Joshua K Hamilton; Peter G Petrov; C Peter Winlove; Andrew D Gilbert; Matthew T Bryan; Feodor Y Ogrin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A synthetic tubular molecular transport system.

Authors:  Pierre Stömmer; Henrik Kiefer; Enzo Kopperger; Maximilian N Honemann; Massimo Kube; Friedrich C Simmel; Roland R Netz; Hendrik Dietz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.