Literature DB >> 26821141

Laminar closure rates in patients with cervical myelopathies treated with either open-door laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous processes and extensor musculature or Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty: a case-control study.

Kentaro Yamane1, Yoshihisa Sugimoto2, Masato Tanaka2, Shinya Arataki2, Tomoyuki Takigawa2, Toshifumi Ozaki2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The presence of preoperative kyphosis has been identified as a risk factor for laminar closure (LC). We have been performing modified open-door laminoplasty with reattachment of the spinous processes and extensor musculature for patients with reduced cervical lordosis because this procedure can prevent progression of cervical kyphosis. This procedure may also prevent LC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of LC after the modified open-door laminoplasty.
METHODS: A total of 104 patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 18 underwent modified open-door laminoplasty (group M), whereas the other 86 underwent Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty (group H). Group H was divided into two classes according to the preoperative cervical lordosis angle (group H1 ≤ 10° vs. group H2 ≥ 11°). All 18 patients in group M had a preoperative lordosis angle ≤10°. The outcomes were assessed using the rate of LC, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the erector muscle on magnetic resonance imaging, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA score).
RESULTS: The rate of laminar closure was significantly lower in group M (39 %) than in group H1 (76 %) (P < 0.01). The CSAs tended to be larger in the muscle preservation side of group M than in the other groups. There was no significant difference in the JOA score among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with decreased cervical lordosis have a higher risk of LC, the results suggested that modified open-door laminoplasty could reduce the rate of LC compared with Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical kyphosis; Cervical myelopathy; Laminar closure; Modified open-door laminoplasty; Open-door laminoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26821141     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4398-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of axial and flexural stresses in lordosis and three buckled configurations of the cervical spine.

Authors:  D E Harrison; D D Harrison; T J Janik; E William Jones; R Cailliet; M Normand
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Cervical laminoplasty developments and trends, 2003-2013: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephan Duetzmann; Tyler Cole; John K Ratliff
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-04-24

3.  A new method of stabilising the elevated laminae in open-door laminoplasty using an anchor system.

Authors:  J M Wang; K J Roh; D J Kim; D W Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

4.  Laminar closure after classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Dong-Ho Lee; Soo-An Park; Nam Heun Kim; Chang Ju Hwang; Yung-Tae Kim; Choon Sung Lee; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Impact of lamina closure on long-term outcomes of open-door laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy: minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Masaya Nakamura; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Relationship between the laminoplasty opening size and the laminoplasty opening angle, increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following open-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhenfang Gu; Aili Zhang; Yong Shen; Feng Li; Xianze Sun; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Risk factors for closure of lamina after open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Hironari Takaishi; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuhiro Chiba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-12

9.  The relationship between laminoplasty opening angle and increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following double-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhen-Fang Gu; Ai-Li Zhang; Yong Shen; Wen-Yuan Ding; Feng Li; Xian-Ze Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Satomi; J Ogawa; Y Ishii; K Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of a monocoque plate-spacer construct for cervical open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yukoh Ohara; Takeshi Hara; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Satoshi Tani; Nozomu Inoue; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.