Literature DB >> 24917478

The relationship between laminoplasty opening angle and increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following double-door cervical laminoplasty.

Zhen-Fang Gu1, Ai-Li Zhang, Yong Shen, Wen-Yuan Ding, Feng Li, Xian-Ze Sun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the relationship between laminoplasty opening angle (LOA) and the increase in sagittal canal diameter (SCD) in double-door cervical laminoplasty (DDCL) and to predict the increase in SCD using the resulting formula.
METHODS: We analyzed 20 patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent DDCL between September 2010 and January 2013. The pre- and post-operative parameters of the cervical spinal canal were measured by computed tomography. We deduced a formula describing the relationship between LOA and the increase in SCD and used it to predict the increase in SCD of these patients as LOA increased.
RESULTS: When the C3-C7 LOA was 25°-45°, the magnitude of the increase in SCD was notable (increases of 3.08-5.6 mm compared with the pre-operative SCD). When the C3-C7 LOA was more than 45°, the magnitude of the increase in SCD was relatively smaller; the increase in C3-C7 SCD with a 55° LOA was merely 0.4 mm more than with a 45° LOA. When LOA was 30° at C3-C6 or 40° at C7, the increase in SCD was more than 4 mm. When the C3-C6 LOA was 40°, SCD increased by more than 5 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The formula accurately showed the relationship between LOA and the increase in SCD in DDCL. Based on the LOA, increases in SCD following C3-C7 laminoplasty can be accurately predicted using this formula. This enables DDCL based on accurate individual LOAs, which prevents inadequate or excessive opening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24917478     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3387-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Results of cervical laminoplasty and a comparison between single and double trap-door techniques.

Authors:  W M Yue; C T Tan; S B Tan; S K Tan; B K Tay
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-08

2.  Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  I Aita; K Hayashi; Y Wadano; T Yabuki
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

3.  The cross-sectional area of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Correlation of preoperative and postoperative area with clinical symptoms.

Authors:  C Hamburger; A Büttner; E Uhl
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Expansive laminoplasty as a method for managing cervical multilevel spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Martin-Benlloch; Jose Ignacio Maruenda-Paulino; Amariel Barra-Pla; Manuel Laguia-Garzaran
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Modified double-door laminoplasty in managing multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical outcome in 520 patients and technique description.

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tetsuro Hida; Keigo Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2013-05

6.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; K Watanabe; K Wakano; N Suzuki; K Satomi; Y Ishii
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study.

Authors:  S Imagama; Y Matsuyama; Y Yukawa; N Kawakami; M Kamiya; T Kanemura; N Ishiguro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

8.  Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Y Uematsu; Y Tokuhashi; H Matsuzaki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Yukawa; Fumihiko Kato; Keigo Ito; Yumiko Horie; Tetsurou Hida; Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Radiculopathy after laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  L Dai; B Ni; W Yuan; L Jia
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Laminar closure rates in patients with cervical myelopathies treated with either open-door laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous processes and extensor musculature or Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamane; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Masato Tanaka; Shinya Arataki; Tomoyuki Takigawa; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The Dural Tube Continues to Expand after Muscle-Preserving Cervical Laminectomy.

Authors:  Ryoma Aoyama; Tateru Shiraishi; Junichi Yamane; Ken Ninomiya; Kazuya Kitamura; Satoshi Nori; Satoshi Suzuki
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-08-25

3.  Comparison of Spinal Canal Expansion Following Cervical Laminoplasty Based on the Preoperative Lamina Angle : A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Jong-Myung Jung; Anthony L Jahng; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2020-12-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.