S Romoli1, L Petrella1, Eleonora Becattini2, A Pisano1, G C Wembagher1, P De Biase3. 1. Spine Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Palagi 1, 50137, Florence, Italy. 2. Spine Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Palagi 1, 50137, Florence, Italy. ele.becattini@gmail.com. 3. Traumatology and General Orthopedic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of our retrospective study is to analyze how spinopelvic dissociations (SPDs) were treated in a single center trying to better understand how to improve surgical and non-surgical options. METHODS: Twenty patients of a single center surgically treated for SPDs between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively included in this study. Three surgical techniques have been used: modified triangular stabilization, triangular stabilization and double iliac screws stabilization. Follow-up was assessed for up to 11.6 ± 9.9 months through ODI, MRS, NRS, IIEF or FSFI, a CT scan and whole spine X-ray examination. RESULTS: Twenty patients were admitted to our ER for traumatic spinopelvic dissociation. Surgical treatment for spinopelvic dissociation has been performed on average 11.5 ± 6.7 days after the trauma event. Eighteen fractures were C3 type and two C2 types. Neurological examination showed nerve root injury (N2) in 5 patients, incomplete spinal cord injury (N3) in 4 patients and cauda equina syndrome in two patients (N4). In case of neurologic deficits, routinary nerve decompression was performed. Three different surgical techniques have been used: 8 triangular fixations (Group 1), 6 modified triangular stabilization (Group 2) and 6 double iliac screws triangular fixation (Group 3). CONCLUSION: In patients with post-traumatic neurological deficit, decompression surgery and fracture reduction seem to be associated with clinical improvement; however, sexual disorders seem to be less responsive to the treatment. Some open stabilization techniques, such as the double iliac screw, could help in restoring the sagittal balance in case of severe deformities.
PURPOSE: The aim of our retrospective study is to analyze how spinopelvic dissociations (SPDs) were treated in a single center trying to better understand how to improve surgical and non-surgical options. METHODS: Twenty patients of a single center surgically treated for SPDs between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively included in this study. Three surgical techniques have been used: modified triangular stabilization, triangular stabilization and double iliac screws stabilization. Follow-up was assessed for up to 11.6 ± 9.9 months through ODI, MRS, NRS, IIEF or FSFI, a CT scan and whole spine X-ray examination. RESULTS: Twenty patients were admitted to our ER for traumatic spinopelvic dissociation. Surgical treatment for spinopelvic dissociation has been performed on average 11.5 ± 6.7 days after the trauma event. Eighteen fractures were C3 type and two C2 types. Neurological examination showed nerve root injury (N2) in 5 patients, incomplete spinal cord injury (N3) in 4 patients and cauda equina syndrome in two patients (N4). In case of neurologic deficits, routinary nerve decompression was performed. Three different surgical techniques have been used: 8 triangular fixations (Group 1), 6 modified triangular stabilization (Group 2) and 6 double iliac screws triangular fixation (Group 3). CONCLUSION: In patients with post-traumatic neurological deficit, decompression surgery and fracture reduction seem to be associated with clinical improvement; however, sexual disorders seem to be less responsive to the treatment. Some open stabilization techniques, such as the double iliac screw, could help in restoring the sagittal balance in case of severe deformities.
Authors: Alexander R Vaccaro; David H Kim; Darrel S Brodke; Mitchel Harris; Jens R Chapman; Thomas Schildhauer; Milton L Routt; Rick C Sasso Journal: Instr Course Lect Date: 2004
Authors: Thomas A Schildhauer; Carlo Bellabarba; Sean E Nork; David P Barei; Milton L Chip Routt; Jens R Chapman Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: W Lehmann; M Hoffmann; D Briem; L Grossterlinden; J P Petersen; M Priemel; P Pogoda; A Ruecker; J M Rueger Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Giuseppe Rovere; Andrea Perna; Luigi Meccariello; Domenico De Mauro; Alessandro Smimmo; Luca Proietti; Francesco Falez; Giulio Maccauro; Francesco Liuzza Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 3.075