Lukas Schwentner1, Reyn Van Ewijk2,3, Thorsten Kühn4, Felix Flock5, Riccardo Felberbaum6, Maria Blettner2, Rolf Kreienberg7, Wolfgang Janni7, Achim Wöckel8, Susanne Singer2. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany. lukas.schwentner@yahoo.de. 2. Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI)-University Medical Centre Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany. 3. Department of Economics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Jakob-Welder-Weg 4, 55128, Mainz, Germany. 4. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Esslingen, Hirschlandstraße 97, 73730, Esslingen, Germany. 5. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Memmingen, Bismarkstraße 23, 87700, Memmingen, Germany. 6. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Kempten, Robert-Weixler-Straße 50, 87439, Kempten, Germany. 7. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany. 8. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Würzburg, Joseph-Schneider Str. 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined which patient- and physician-related factors influence guideline violations in adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multi-center cohort study, patients with primary breast cancer were sampled consecutively over a period of four years (2009-2012). Patients completed a questionnaire prior to surgery and prior to adjuvant therapy. This questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life (QoL) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, psychiatric co-morbidity with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), demographic characteristics (age, education), and the intensity of fear for chemotherapy. After surgery, a multi-professional team discussed recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, and this decision was documented in a database together with the indication for chemotherapy according to the German S3 guideline. This multi-professional team was blinded to that algorithm-based decision. Six months later, it was documented whether the patient had received adjuvant chemotherapy or not. RESULTS: Altogether, 857 patients were included in the study. In 391 of these patients, the tumor board (TB) decided to recommend chemotherapy. The most important reasons for not recommending chemotherapy were somatic co-morbidity not allowing adjuvant chemotherapy and age >75 years. Of these 391 patients, 73 (19 %) patients eventually did not receive chemotherapy. Deviations from the initial therapy decision were more frequent in older patients (≥75 years) with poor QoL. If the QoL was good, higher age was not related to deviation. There was some evidence that patients with higher education less frequently received chemotherapy (CT). Furthermore, if patients were very afraid of chemotherapy, deviations from the initial therapy decision were more likely. Co-morbidity and fear of CT were not related to the likelihood of deviating from the initial therapy decision. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of patients eventually did not receive chemotherapy, despite guideline and TB recommendations. In these patients, this mainly occurred in association with poor QoL in elderly patients >75 years old. In the group with a chemotherapy recommendation, patients' fear of chemotherapy is another factor preventing patients from undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: This study examined which patient- and physician-related factors influence guideline violations in adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multi-center cohort study, patients with primary breast cancer were sampled consecutively over a period of four years (2009-2012). Patients completed a questionnaire prior to surgery and prior to adjuvant therapy. This questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life (QoL) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, psychiatric co-morbidity with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), demographic characteristics (age, education), and the intensity of fear for chemotherapy. After surgery, a multi-professional team discussed recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, and this decision was documented in a database together with the indication for chemotherapy according to the German S3 guideline. This multi-professional team was blinded to that algorithm-based decision. Six months later, it was documented whether the patient had received adjuvant chemotherapy or not. RESULTS: Altogether, 857 patients were included in the study. In 391 of these patients, the tumor board (TB) decided to recommend chemotherapy. The most important reasons for not recommending chemotherapy were somatic co-morbidity not allowing adjuvant chemotherapy and age >75 years. Of these 391 patients, 73 (19 %) patients eventually did not receive chemotherapy. Deviations from the initial therapy decision were more frequent in older patients (≥75 years) with poor QoL. If the QoL was good, higher age was not related to deviation. There was some evidence that patients with higher education less frequently received chemotherapy (CT). Furthermore, if patients were very afraid of chemotherapy, deviations from the initial therapy decision were more likely. Co-morbidity and fear of CT were not related to the likelihood of deviating from the initial therapy decision. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of patients eventually did not receive chemotherapy, despite guideline and TB recommendations. In these patients, this mainly occurred in association with poor QoL in elderly patients >75 years old. In the group with a chemotherapy recommendation, patients' fear of chemotherapy is another factor preventing patients from undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Co-morbidity; Compliance; Guideline
Authors: R Wolters; A C Regierer; L Schwentner; V Geyer; K Possinger; R Kreienberg; M B Wischnewsky; A Wöckel Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: K Hancke; M D Denkinger; J König; C Kurzeder; A Wöckel; D Herr; M Blettner; R Kreienberg Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: A Wöckel; R Wolters; T Wiegel; I Novopashenny; W Janni; R Kreienberg; M Wischnewsky; L Schwentner Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-02-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: N Riccetti; R Felberbaum; F Flock; T Kühn; E Leinert; L Schwentner; S Singer; K Taylor; A Wöckel; W Janni Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Stephanie Stangl; Kirsten Haas; Felizitas A Eichner; Anna Grau; Udo Selig; Timo Ludwig; Tanja Fehm; Tanja Stüber; Asarnusch Rashid; Alexander Kerscher; Ralf Bargou; Silke Hermann; Volker Arndt; Martin Meyer; Manfred Wildner; Hermann Faller; Michael G Schrauder; Michael Weigel; Ulrich Schlembach; Peter U Heuschmann; Achim Wöckel Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2020-02-04
Authors: Ena Niño de Guzmán; Yang Song; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Luciana Neamtiu; Elena Parmelli; Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione; Montserrat Rabassa; David Rigau; Zuleika Saz Parkinson; Iván Solà; Adrián Vásquez-Mejía; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 4.872