Susanne Singer1,2, Wolfgang Janni3, Thorsten Kühn4, Felix Flock5, Ricardo Felberbaum6, Lukas Schwentner3, Elena Leinert3, Achim Wöckel7, Tanja Schlaiß7. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany. singers@uni-mainz.de. 2. University Cancer Centre, Mainz, Germany. singers@uni-mainz.de. 3. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 4. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Esslingen, Memmingen, Germany. 5. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany. 6. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Kempten, Kempten, Germany. 7. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examined the pattern of psychosocial care in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: In a prospective study with measurements before surgery, 1 month, 8 months, and 5 years thereafter, we examined the proportion of breast cancer survivors who were aware about, had been offered and received various types of psychosocial services from psychologists, social workers, doctors, self-help groups etc. The degree of helpfulness per service among users was ascertained with Likert scales. Determinants of awareness, offer and use were investigated using binary logistic regression analyses. How the services are inter-related was tested with principal component analyses. RESULTS: Among 456 breast cancer survivors who participated until 5 years, psychological services were known by 91%, offered to 68%, and used by 55% of patients. Social services were known by 86%, offered to 65%, and used by 51%. Women ≥ 65 years were less likely to be informed about (odds ratio (OR) 0.2) and get offers for psychosocial services (OR 0.4 for social and 0.5 for psychological services) than women < 65 years. The services rated most helpful were social services in the hospital, psychological counselling by a consultant and psychotherapy in private practices. CONCLUSION: These findings underline the importance of psychosocial support by physicians in addition to the "professional" mental health and social care providers. They also show that elderly women in need for support might be in danger of not being well-informed about the services available.
PURPOSE: This study examined the pattern of psychosocial care in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: In a prospective study with measurements before surgery, 1 month, 8 months, and 5 years thereafter, we examined the proportion of breast cancer survivors who were aware about, had been offered and received various types of psychosocial services from psychologists, social workers, doctors, self-help groups etc. The degree of helpfulness per service among users was ascertained with Likert scales. Determinants of awareness, offer and use were investigated using binary logistic regression analyses. How the services are inter-related was tested with principal component analyses. RESULTS: Among 456 breast cancer survivors who participated until 5 years, psychological services were known by 91%, offered to 68%, and used by 55% of patients. Social services were known by 86%, offered to 65%, and used by 51%. Women ≥ 65 years were less likely to be informed about (odds ratio (OR) 0.2) and get offers for psychosocial services (OR 0.4 for social and 0.5 for psychological services) than women < 65 years. The services rated most helpful were social services in the hospital, psychological counselling by a consultant and psychotherapy in private practices. CONCLUSION: These findings underline the importance of psychosocial support by physicians in addition to the "professional" mental health and social care providers. They also show that elderly women in need for support might be in danger of not being well-informed about the services available.
Authors: S Schreiber; C Ehrensperger; S Koscielny; A Boehm; W Kubitza; E Meister; F Pabst; H J Vogel; J Oeken; A Dietz; S Singer; A Meyer Journal: Laryngorhinootologie Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 1.057
Authors: S Singer; C Szalai; S Briest; A Brown; A Dietz; J Einenkel; S Jonas; A Konnopka; K Papsdorf; D Langanke; M Löbner; F Schiefke; J-U Stolzenburg; A Weimann; H Wirtz; H H König; S Riedel-Heller Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 3.894