Nadia Harbeck1, Maria Blettner2, Peyman Hadji3, Christian Jackisch4, Hans-Joachim Lück5, Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach6, Silke Zaun7, Renate Haidinger8, Doris Schmitt9, Hilde Schulte10, Ulrike Nitz11, Rolf Kreienberg12. 1. Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich, Ulm, Germany. 2. IMBEI, MainzUniversity Hospital Marburg, Munich, Ulm, Germany. 3. University Hospital Marburg, Munich, Ulm, Germany. 4. Klinikum Offenbach, Munich, Ulm, Germany. 5. Gynecologic-Oncological Practice Hannover, Munich, Ulm, Germany. 6. Alcedis GmbH, Gießen, Munich, Ulm, Germany. 7. AstraZeneca, Wedel, Munich, Ulm, Germany. 8. Brustkrebs Deutschland e.V., Munich, Ulm, Germany. 9. PATH Foundation, Radolfzell, Ulm, Germany. 10. Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs e.V., Bonn, Ulm, Germany. 11. Niederrhein Breast Centre, Mönchengladbach, Ulm, Germany ; Westdeutsches Brust-Centrum (WBC), Düsseldorf, Ulm, Germany. 12. Women's University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Patient's Anastrozole Compliance to Therapy (PACT) program is a large randomized study designed to assess whether the provision of educational materials (EM) could improve compliance with aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PACT study presented a large, homogeneous dataset. The baseline analysis included patient demographics and initial treatments and patient perceptions about treatment and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, 4,923 patients were enrolled at 109 German breast cancer centers/clinics in cooperation with 1,361 office-based gynecologists/oncologists. 4,844 women were randomized 1:1 to standard therapy (n = 2,402) or standard therapy plus EM (n = 2,442). Prior breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy had been received by 76% and 24% of the patients, respectively. Radiotherapy was scheduled for 85% of the patients, adjuvant chemotherapy for 38%. Reflecting the postmenopausal, hormone-sensitive nature of this population, only 285 patients (7%) had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison with epidemiological data from the West German Breast Center suggests that the patients in the PACT study are representative of a general postmenopausal early breast cancer population and that the findings may be applicable to 'real-world' Germany and beyond. Compliance data from PACT are eagerly anticipated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Patient's Anastrozole Compliance to Therapy (PACT) program is a large randomized study designed to assess whether the provision of educational materials (EM) could improve compliance with aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PACT study presented a large, homogeneous dataset. The baseline analysis included patient demographics and initial treatments and patient perceptions about treatment and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, 4,923 patients were enrolled at 109 German breast cancer centers/clinics in cooperation with 1,361 office-based gynecologists/oncologists. 4,844 women were randomized 1:1 to standard therapy (n = 2,402) or standard therapy plus EM (n = 2,442). Prior breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy had been received by 76% and 24% of the patients, respectively. Radiotherapy was scheduled for 85% of the patients, adjuvant chemotherapy for 38%. Reflecting the postmenopausal, hormone-sensitive nature of this population, only 285 patients (7%) had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison with epidemiological data from the West German Breast Center suggests that the patients in the PACT study are representative of a general postmenopausal early breast cancer population and that the findings may be applicable to 'real-world' Germany and beyond. Compliance data from PACT are eagerly anticipated.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aromatase inhibitors; Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Compliance; Mastectomy
Authors: J G H van Nes; C Seynaeve; S Jones; C Markopoulos; H Putter; C J H van de Velde; A Hasenburg; D W Rea; J-M Vannetzel; L Dirix; Y Hozumi; M J Kerin; D G Kieback; W M Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; E T M Hille; J W R Nortier Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Mitch Dowsett; John F Forbes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: P A Fasching; T Fehm; S Kellner; J de Waal; M Rezai; B Baier; G Baake; H-C Kolberg; M Guggenberger; M Warm; N Harbeck; R Würstlein; J-U Deuker; P Dall; B Richter; G Wachsmann; C Brucker; J W Siebers; N Fersis; T Kuhn; C Wolf; H-W Vollert; G-P Breitbach; W Janni; R Landthaler; A Kohls; D Rezek; T Noesslet; G Fischer; S Henschen; T Praetz; V Heyl; T Kühn; T Krauß; C Thomssen; S Kümmel; A Hohn; H Tesch; C Mundhenke; A Hein; C Rauh; C M Bayer; A Jacob; K Schmidt; E Belleville; P Hadji; D Wallwiener; E-M Grischke; M W Beckmann; S Y Brucker Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Joseph A Greer; Nicole Amoyal; Lauren Nisotel; Joel N Fishbein; James MacDonald; Jamie Stagl; Inga Lennes; Jennifer S Temel; Steven A Safren; William F Pirl Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Lukas Schwentner; Reyn Van Ewijk; Thorsten Kühn; Felix Flock; Riccardo Felberbaum; Maria Blettner; Rolf Kreienberg; Wolfgang Janni; Achim Wöckel; Susanne Singer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 3.603