Literature DB >> 2681325

Assessment of regional myocardial perfusion by contrast echocardiography. II. Detection of changes in transmural and subendocardial perfusion during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in a model of critical coronary stenosis.

J Cheirif1, W A Zoghbi, R Bolli, P G O'Neill, B D Hoyt, M A Quinones.   

Abstract

Measurements of myocardial contrast (sonicated meglumine diatrizoate) intensity were compared with myocardial flow by radioactive microspheres before and after administration of dipyridamole (0.5 mg/kg body weight intravenously) in 10 open chest dogs with a critical stenosis in the left circumflex coronary artery. Computer measurements of contrast time-intensity curves corrected for background myocardial intensity were made along 12 transmural segments of the left ventricle at mid-papillary level and for the subendocardial and subepicardial half of each segment. After administration of dipyridamole, transmural flow in the control region increased significantly (p less than 0.001), resulting in a dipyridamole/baseline flow ratio (i.e., coronary reserve ratio) of 2.54 +/- 0.95. Similar changes (p less than 0.001) were seen by contrast echocardiography; the coronary reserve ratio was 2.10 +/- 0.60 with use of peak intensity and 3.48 +/- 1.58 with use of area under the time-intensity curve. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in myocardial flow, peak contrast intensity or area under the curve in the ischemic region after dipyridamole. In the control region the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial flow was similar at baseline and after dipyridamole administration as assessed by microspheres (1.08 +/- 0.24 versus 1.17 +/- 0.25) or by area under the time-intensity curve (1.11 +/- 0.45 versus 1.11 +/- 0.56). In the ischemic region, the subendocardial/subepicardial flow ratio decreased significantly after dipyridamole administration as measured by microspheres (1.15 +/- 0.19 to 0.82 +/- 0.25; p less than 0.001) or by area under the curve (1.10 +/- 0.28 to 0.70 +/- 0.47; p less than 0.01). Thus, myocardial contrast echocardiography appears to be a sensitive technique with which to detect changes in myocardial flow induced by dipyridamole in the various myocardial layers of normal segments as well as of segments supplied by a critically stenotic coronary artery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2681325     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90398-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  Contrast echocardiography 1996. A review.

Authors:  H R Villarraga; D A Foley; S L Mulvagh
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography for assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  R Leischik; J Rose; G Caspari; A Skyschally; G Heusch; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Clinical methods to determine coronary flow and myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  M J Wolters-Geldof; V M Cats; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-04

4.  Sonicated X-ray contrast agents for quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography--a critical approach.

Authors:  I V Mayer; M P Lazarov; U Utzinger; A U Freiburghaus; O M Hess
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Enhanced methods for visualizing myocardial perfusion with peripheral venous injection of levovist: application of triggered harmonic imaging and triggered harmonic power Doppler imaging techniques.

Authors:  K Hirooka; K Miyatake; A Hanatani; K Komamura; S Nakatani; Y Yasumura; M Yamagishi
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-08

6.  Rotational ablation of discrete lesions in the coronary arteries is safe. A nonrandomized comparison with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  J Cheirif; R Wray; J Heibig; S Harris; R Staudacher; M Bucay; N Zacca
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.