Literature DB >> 2681316

Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children.

R Tannock1, R J Schachar, R P Carr, D Chajczyk, G D Logan.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of methylphenidate (MPH) on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. A double-blind, placebo-control, within-subject (crossover) design was used in which 12 children, between 6 and 11 years of age, were each tested four times in each drug condition: 0.3 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg of methylphenidate, and placebo. Dependent measures included (a) the probability of inhibiting responses to a primary choice reaction time task given a stop signal, on the Stopping Task, and (b) response latency and errors on the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). MPH improved the efficiency of the central inhibitory mechanism by speeding the inhibitory process, thereby affording the children greater control over their actions and enabling them to increase the probability with which they inhibited responses given a stop signal. MPH increased response latency but did not reduce errors on the MFFT, and observation of the children's task performance highlighted the interpretive problems associated with this task. Performance on both tasks was better at a dosage of 1.0 mg/kg than at 0.3 mg/kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2681316     DOI: 10.1007/bf00916508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol        ISSN: 0091-0627


  17 in total

1.  Effects of methylphenidate on adolescents with a childhood history of attention deficit disorder: I. Clinical findings.

Authors:  R Klorman; H W Coons; A D Borgstedt
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 8.829

2.  Effects of methylphenidate on normal children's mood, event-related potentials, and performance in memory scanning and vigilance.

Authors:  L J Peloquin; R Klorman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1986-02

3.  Visual scanning strategies of reflective, impulsive, fast-accurate, and slow-inaccurate children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test.

Authors:  R L Ault; D E Crawford; W E Jeffrey
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1972-12

4.  How much stimulant medication is appropriate for hyperactive school children?

Authors:  R T Brown; L W Slimmer; M E Wynne
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.118

5.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method.

Authors:  G D Logan; W B Cowan; K A Davis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Normative data on revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.

Authors:  C H Goyette; C K Conners; R F Ulrich
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1978-06

7.  The characteristics of situationally and pervasively hyperactive children: implications for syndrome definition.

Authors:  R Schachar; M Rutter; A Smith
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  The prevalence of learning disabilities in a sample of children considered hyperactive.

Authors:  N M Lambert; J Sandoval
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1980-03

9.  Methylphenidate in hyperkinetic children: differences in dose effects on impulsive behavior.

Authors:  R T Brown; E K Sleator
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Time-response analysis of the effect of stimulant medication on the learning ability of children referred for hyperactivity.

Authors:  J Swanson; M Kinsbourne; W Roberts; K Zucker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  96 in total

Review 1.  Hyperactivity in children: a focus on genetic research and psychological theories.

Authors:  J Kuntsi; J Stevenson
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  A review of the validity of laboratory cognitive tasks used to assess symptoms of ADHD.

Authors:  Shana L Nichols; Daniel A Waschbusch
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2004

3.  Striatal dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors mediate response inhibition and related activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry in humans.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Buyean Lee; Chelsea L Robertson; Golnaz Tabibnia; Andrew T Morgan; Natalie De Shetler; Amira K Brown; John R Monterosso; Adam R Aron; Mark A Mandelkern; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Striatal D1- and D2-type dopamine receptors are linked to motor response inhibition in human subjects.

Authors:  Chelsea L Robertson; Kenji Ishibashi; Mark A Mandelkern; Amira K Brown; Dara G Ghahremani; Fred Sabb; Robert Bilder; Tyrone Cannon; Jacqueline Borg; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Lack of effects of guanfacine on executive and memory functions in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Ulrich Müller; Luke Clark; Minh L Lam; Rebecca M Moore; C Louise Murphy; Nicola K Richmond; Ranbir S Sandhu; Ingrid A Wilkins; David K Menon; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Methylphenidate and cognitive flexibility: dissociated dose effects in hyperactive children.

Authors:  R Tannock; R Schachar; G Logan
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1995-04

7.  Relative lack of cognitive effects of methylphenidate in elderly male volunteers.

Authors:  Danielle C Turner; Trevor W Robbins; Luke Clark; Adam R Aron; Jonathan Dowson; Barbara J Sahakian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Stimulant treatment reduces lapses in attention among children with ADHD: the effects of methylphenidate on intra-individual response time distributions.

Authors:  Sarah V Spencer; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards; Keri Shiels; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-08

Review 9.  Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes.

Authors:  Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.