RATIONALE: Methylphenidate, a dopaminergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor, has been shown in young, healthy adult volunteers to produce pronounced effects on working memory and sustained attention. We were interested in assessing whether similar improvements could be conferred upon elderly volunteers in order to gain a more complete understanding of the effects of age on monoaminergic manipulations of working memory and attention, as well as to explore the potential for pharmacological intervention in attention and executive dysfunction disorders in this age group. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to characterise the dose-related effects of methylphenidate on a range of neuropsychological functions in elderly healthy volunteers. METHODS:Sixty healthy elderly adult male volunteers received either a single oral dose of placebo, 20 mg or 40 mg methylphenidate prior to performing a variety of tasks designed to assess memory, attention and executive function. A randomised double-blind, between-subjects design was used. RESULTS:Methylphenidate had significant cardiovascular and subjective effects. However, unlike in younger volunteers, no significant effects of drug on working memory (spatial span and spatial working memory), response inhibition (stop-signal) or sustained attention (rapid visual information processing) were seen. Subtle effects on latency similar to those in younger volunteers were identified: both doses of methylphenidate resulted in a slowing in response time during set-shifting and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that, in elderly subjects, the cognitive effects of methylphenidate are grossly attenuated and distinct from the profile previously described in younger volunteers. It is suggested that methylphenidate may not be appropriate as a pharmacological intervention in elderly patient groups, such as those reporting age-related cognitive decline.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Methylphenidate, a dopaminergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor, has been shown in young, healthy adult volunteers to produce pronounced effects on working memory and sustained attention. We were interested in assessing whether similar improvements could be conferred upon elderly volunteers in order to gain a more complete understanding of the effects of age on monoaminergic manipulations of working memory and attention, as well as to explore the potential for pharmacological intervention in attention and executive dysfunction disorders in this age group. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to characterise the dose-related effects of methylphenidate on a range of neuropsychological functions in elderly healthy volunteers. METHODS: Sixty healthy elderly adult male volunteers received either a single oral dose of placebo, 20 mg or 40 mg methylphenidate prior to performing a variety of tasks designed to assess memory, attention and executive function. A randomised double-blind, between-subjects design was used. RESULTS:Methylphenidate had significant cardiovascular and subjective effects. However, unlike in younger volunteers, no significant effects of drug on working memory (spatial span and spatial working memory), response inhibition (stop-signal) or sustained attention (rapid visual information processing) were seen. Subtle effects on latency similar to those in younger volunteers were identified: both doses of methylphenidate resulted in a slowing in response time during set-shifting and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that, in elderly subjects, the cognitive effects of methylphenidate are grossly attenuated and distinct from the profile previously described in younger volunteers. It is suggested that methylphenidate may not be appropriate as a pharmacological intervention in elderly patient groups, such as those reporting age-related cognitive decline.
Authors: K Rubia; S Overmeyer; E Taylor; M Brammer; S C Williams; A Simmons; C Andrew; E T Bullmore Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Kathrin Finke; Chris M Dodds; Peter Bublak; Ralf Regenthal; Frank Baumann; Tom Manly; Ulrich Müller Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Danielle C Turner; Andrew D Blackwell; Jonathan H Dowson; Andrew McLean; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2004-08-27 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Nan Zhang; Nicole J Ullrich; Pim Brouwers; Daniel M Green; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Marilyn Stovall; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Alexa M Morcom; Edward T Bullmore; Felicia A Huppert; Belinda Lennox; Asha Praseedom; Helen Linnington; Paul C Fletcher Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 5.357