Literature DB >> 34504406

Augmented Reality: Moving Robotics Forward.

Nadine Hachach-Haram1, Danilo Miskovic1.   

Abstract

Compared with other fields, adoption of robotics in colorectal surgery remains relatively slow. One of the reasons for this is that the expected benefits of robotics, such as greater accuracy, speed, and better patient outcomes, are not born out in evidence comparing use of robotics for colorectal procedures to conventional laparoscopy. But evidence also suggests that outcomes with colorectal robotic procedures depend on the experience of the surgeon, suggesting that a steep learning curve is acting as a barrier to the benefits of robotics being realized. In this paper, we analyze exactly why surgeon skill and proficiency is such a critical factor in colorectal surgery, especially around the most complex procedures associated with cancer. Shortening of the learning curve is crucial for both the adoption of the technique and the efficient use of expert trainers. Looking beyond the basics of training and embracing a new generation of digital learning technologies that facilitate peer-to-peer collaboration and development beyond the confines of individual institutions may be an important contributor to achieve these goals in the future. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal robotic; digital learning; remote learning; robot-assisted colorectal surgery; robotic colorectal surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34504406      PMCID: PMC8416328          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  16 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Anthony J Senagore; Justin K Lawrence; Brad J Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guixiang Liao; Zhihong Zhao; Haijun Deng; Xianming Li
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.547

3.  Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  S G Larsen; F Pfeffer; H Kørner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Complementing Operating Room Teaching With Video-Based Coaching.

Authors:  Yue-Yung Hu; Laura M Mazer; Steven J Yule; Alexander F Arriaga; Caprice C Greenberg; Stuart R Lipsitz; Atul A Gawande; Douglas S Smink
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  A Statewide Surgical Coaching Program Provides Opportunity for Continuous Professional Development.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Hala N Ghousseini; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Heather L Beasley; Lane L Frasier; Nicole A Brys; Janet C Dombrowski; Douglas A Wiegmann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Allison Weaver; Scott Steele
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-26

Review 7.  Choosing the new normal for surgical education using alternative platforms.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Rebecca C Grossman; Des C Winter
Journal:  Surgery (Oxf)       Date:  2020-08-30

8.  How robotics is changing and will change the field of colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Crystal Koerner; Seth Alan Rosen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-10-27

9.  taTME: boom or bust?

Authors:  Liang Kang; Patricia Sylla; Sam Atallah; Massaki Ito; Steven D Wexner; Jian-Ping Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2020-02-21

10.  Peer-to-Peer Collaboration Adds Value for Surgical Colleagues.

Authors:  Ameer M Elbuluk; Michael P Ast; Jeffrey D Stimac; Trevor R Banka; Matthew P Abdel; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.