Literature DB >> 26810981

Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT.

Phillip M Cheng1,2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a significant effect, independent of patient size, of patient vertical centering on the current-modulated CT scanner radiation output in adult abdominopelvic CT. A phantom was used to evaluate calculation of vertical positioning and effective diameter at five different table heights. In addition, 656 consecutive contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic scans using the same protocol and automatic tube current modulation settings on a Philips Brilliance 64 MDCT scanner were retrospectively evaluated. The vertical position of the patient center of mass and the average effective diameter of the scanned patient were computed using the reconstructed images. The average volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) for each scan was recorded. The mean patient center of mass y coordinate ranged from -3.7 to 6.7 cm (mean ± SD, 2.8 ± 1.2 cm), indicating that patients were on average positioned slightly below the scanner isocenter. There was a slight tendency for smaller patients to be mis-centered lower than larger patients. Average CTDIvol closely fit a quadratic regression curve with respect to mean effective diameter. However, the value of the regression coefficient relating CTDIvol to the patient's vertical position was nearly zero, indicating only a very slight increase in CTDIvol with patient mis-centering for the scanner used in this study. The techniques used here may be useful both for automated evaluation of proper patient positioning in CT and for estimating the radiation dose effects of patient mis-centering for any CT scanner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body imaging; Computed tomography; Image analysis; Quality control; Radiation dose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26810981      PMCID: PMC4942388          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9861-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

1.  Misoperation of CT automatic tube current modulation systems with inappropriate patient centering: phantom studies.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Kichiro Koshida; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Masayuki Suzuki; Tadanori Takata; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.

Authors:  Touko Kaasalainen; Kirsi Palmu; Vappu Reijonen; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Toward Large-Scale Process Control to Enable Consistent CT Radiation Dose Optimization.

Authors:  David B Larson; Keith J Strauss; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose.

Authors:  Jianhai Li; Unni K Udayasankar; Thomas L Toth; John Seamans; William C Small; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.

Authors:  M A Habibzadeh; M R Ay; A R Kamali Asl; H Ghadiri; H Zaidi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise.

Authors:  Thomas Toth; Zhanyu Ge; Michael P Daly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Effect of vertical positioning on organ dose, image noise and contrast in pediatric chest CT--phantom study.

Authors:  Touko Kaasalainen; Kirsi Palmu; Anniina Lampinen; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-01-23

9.  Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation.

Authors:  Peter A Harri; Courtney C Moreno; Rendon C Nelson; Negar Fani; William C Small; Phuong-Anh T Duong; Anh Duong; Xiangyang Tang; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Automated estimation of abdominal effective diameter for body size normalization of CT dose.

Authors:  Phillip M Cheng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose management for pediatric cardiac computed tomography: a report from the Image Gently 'Have-A-Heart' campaign.

Authors:  Cynthia K Rigsby; Sarah E McKenney; Kevin D Hill; Anjali Chelliah; Andrew J Einstein; B Kelly Han; Joshua D Robinson; Christina L Sammet; Timothy C Slesnick; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-01-01

2.  The effect of vertical centering and scout direction on automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT: a preliminary phantom study on two different CT equipments.

Authors:  Touko Kaasalainen; Teemu Mäkelä; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-12-17

3.  The Improvement of Patient Centering in Computed Tomography Through a Technologist-Focused Education Initiative.

Authors:  Lindsay DeWeese; Thomas Griglock; Alexander Moody; Aaron Mehlberg; Celeste Winters
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.056

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.