Literature DB >> 26809871

Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia According to the Number of High-Risk Findings at Index Colonoscopy: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study.

Yoon Suk Jung1, Dong Il Park2, Won Hee Kim3, Chang Soo Eun4, Soo-Kyung Park1, Bong Min Ko5, Geom Seog Seo6, Jae Myung Cha7, Jae Jun Park8, Kyeong Ok Kim9, Chang Mo Moon10, Yunho Jung11, Eun Soo Kim12, Seong Ran Jeon13, Chang Kyun Lee14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data regarding outcomes for patients with multiple findings for high-risk adenomas are scarce. AIM: To compare the risk for colorectal neoplasm (CRN) recurrence according to the number of high-risk findings.
METHODS: This was a retrospective and multicenter study. Patients who had one or more high-risk adenomas at the index colonoscopy and underwent follow-up colonoscopy 2.5 or more years after the index colonoscopy were included. The number of high-risk findings was defined as follows: number of adenomas larger than 1 cm + number of adenomas with HGD + number of adenomas with a villous component + existence (counted as 1) or nonexistence (counted as 0) of three or more adenomas.
RESULTS: A total of 1646 patients were included, and the mean duration between index and follow-up colonoscopy was approximately 4 years. The cumulative incidence rate of recurrent advanced CRN in patients with three or more high-risk findings was higher than that in patients with one or two high-risk findings (p < 0.001). However, the difference in 3-year cumulative incidence rates of recurrent advanced CRN between the two groups was not great, although it was statistically significant (4.8 vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS: A 3-year surveillance interval for patients with multiple high-risk findings, regardless of the number of high-risk findings, appears reasonable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasia; High-risk adenoma; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26809871     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4038-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans.

Authors:  Su Jin Chung; Young Sun Kim; Sun Young Yang; Ji Hyun Song; Donghee Kim; Min Jung Park; Sang Gyun Kim; In Sung Song; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon.

Authors:  Timothy A Woodward; Michael G Heckman; Patrick Cleveland; Silvio De Melo; Massimo Raimondo; Michael Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Novel risk stratification for recurrence after endoscopic resection of advanced colorectal adenoma.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Seo; Jaeyoung Chun; Changhyun Lee; Kyoung Sup Hong; Jong Pil Im; Sang Gyun Kim; Hyun Chae Jung; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; Th Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Are Asians at greater mortality risks for being overweight than Caucasians? Redefining obesity for Asians.

Authors:  Chi Pang Wen; Ting Yuan David Cheng; Shan Pou Tsai; Hui Ting Chan; Hui Ling Hsu; Chih Cheng Hsu; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence.

Authors:  C Bonithon-Kopp; F Piard; C Fenger; E Cabeza; C O'Morain; O Kronborg; J Faivre
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Clinical application of genetics in management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eun Ran Kim; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2014-07-25
View more
  2 in total

1.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

2.  Histologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of colorectal polyp in actual clinical practice.

Authors:  Moon Joo Hwang; Kyeong Ok Kim; A Lim Kim; Si Hyung Lee; Byung Ik Jang; Tae Nyeun Kim
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-07-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.