Literature DB >> 26808333

Deep MRI brain extraction: A 3D convolutional neural network for skull stripping.

Jens Kleesiek1, Gregor Urban2, Alexander Hubert2, Daniel Schwarz2, Klaus Maier-Hein3, Martin Bendszus2, Armin Biller4.   

Abstract

Brain extraction from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for many neuroimaging workflows. Current methods demonstrate good results on non-enhanced T1-weighted images, but struggle when confronted with other modalities and pathologically altered tissue. In this paper we present a 3D convolutional deep learning architecture to address these shortcomings. In contrast to existing methods, we are not limited to non-enhanced T1w images. When trained appropriately, our approach handles an arbitrary number of modalities including contrast-enhanced scans. Its applicability to MRI data, comprising four channels: non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced T1w, T2w and FLAIR contrasts, is demonstrated on a challenging clinical data set containing brain tumors (N=53), where our approach significantly outperforms six commonly used tools with a mean Dice score of 95.19. Further, the proposed method at least matches state-of-the-art performance as demonstrated on three publicly available data sets: IBSR, LPBA40 and OASIS, totaling N=135 volumes. For the IBSR (96.32) and LPBA40 (96.96) data set the convolutional neuronal network (CNN) obtains the highest average Dice scores, albeit not being significantly different from the second best performing method. For the OASIS data the second best Dice (95.02) results are achieved, with no statistical difference in comparison to the best performing tool. For all data sets the highest average specificity measures are evaluated, whereas the sensitivity displays about average results. Adjusting the cut-off threshold for generating the binary masks from the CNN's probability output can be used to increase the sensitivity of the method. Of course, this comes at the cost of a decreased specificity and has to be decided application specific. Using an optimized GPU implementation predictions can be achieved in less than one minute. The proposed method may prove useful for large-scale studies and clinical trials.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain extraction; Brain mask; Convolutional networks; Deep learning; MRI; Skull stripping

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26808333     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  59 in total

1.  QSMGAN: Improved Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using 3D Generative Adversarial Networks with increased receptive field.

Authors:  Yicheng Chen; Angela Jakary; Sivakami Avadiappan; Christopher P Hess; Janine M Lupo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Brain extraction from normal and pathological images: A joint PCA/Image-Reconstruction approach.

Authors:  Xu Han; Roland Kwitt; Stephen Aylward; Spyridon Bakas; Bjoern Menze; Alexander Asturias; Paul Vespa; John Van Horn; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Automatic Brain Extraction for Rodent MRI Images.

Authors:  Yikang Liu; Hayreddin Said Unsal; Yi Tao; Nanyin Zhang
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-06

4.  Pulmonary nodule classification in lung cancer screening with three-dimensional convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Yiting Xie; Artit Jirapatnakul; Anthony P Reeves
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-11-14

5.  State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.

Authors:  Anam Fatima; Ahmad Raza Shahid; Basit Raza; Tahir Mustafa Madni; Uzair Iqbal Janjua
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Deep regression neural networks for collateral imaging from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Minh Nguyen Nhat To; Hyun Jeong Kim; Hong Gee Roh; Yoon-Sik Cho; Jin Tae Kwak
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Deep multi-scale location-aware 3D convolutional neural networks for automated detection of lacunes of presumed vascular origin.

Authors:  Mohsen Ghafoorian; Nico Karssemeijer; Tom Heskes; Mayra Bergkamp; Joost Wissink; Jiri Obels; Karlijn Keizer; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Bram van Ginneken; Elena Marchiori; Bram Platel
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 8.  Deep Learning in Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Hongyoon Choi
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-16

Review 9.  Radiological images and machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  Zhenwei Zhang; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data.

Authors:  Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.