Literature DB >> 26807901

Anterior Chamber Air Bubble to Achieve Graft Attachment After DMEK: Is Bigger Always Better?

Aleksandar Ćirković1, Christina Beck, Julia M Weller, Friedrich E Kruse, Theofilos Tourtas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of the size of the air bubble subsequent to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery on the rate of graft detachment and need for rebubbling, the incidence of pupillary block, and the observed endothelial cell loss.
METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series of 74 cases undergoing DMEK and fulfilling the inclusion criteria concerning the size of the air bubble at the end of surgery. Based on the medical records, patients were divided into 2 groups (n = 37, respectively). The first group had an air bubble with a volume of approximately 50% and the second group of approximately 80% of the anterior chamber (AC) volume, respectively. Patients who did not comply with instructions to remain in the supine position until complete resorption of AC air or cases in which difficulties in graft preparation (eg, radial breaks) occurred were excluded from data analysis. The central corneal thickness and endothelial cell density were measured 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Ten of 37 patients (27.0%) in the 50% air bubble group and 3 of 37 patients (8.1%) in the 80% air bubble group needed 1 rebubbling procedure (P = 0.032). There was no difference between the groups after 6 months regarding endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness. No pupillary block was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger air bubbles of 80% anterior chamber volume decrease the risk of graft detachment after DMEK with no detrimental effect on the outcome and risk for pupillary block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26807901     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

1.  "PI-less DMEK": results of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without a peripheral iridotomy.

Authors:  Eitan Livny; Irit Bahar; Issac Levy; Michael Mimouni; Yoav Nahum
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Recipient Factors Associated With Graft Detachment of a Subsequent Eye in Sequential Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kyeong Hwan Kim; Marius A Tijunelis; Yunshu Zhou; David C Musch; Christopher T Hood; Bradford L Tannen; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study.

Authors:  Jan O Pralits; Mark Alberti; Javier Cabreizo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: analysis of clinical outcomes of patients with 8-10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Julia M Weller; Friedrich E Kruse; Theofilos Tourtas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.029

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.