Literature DB >> 30518974

"PI-less DMEK": results of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without a peripheral iridotomy.

Eitan Livny1,2, Irit Bahar1,2, Issac Levy1,2, Michael Mimouni3,4, Yoav Nahum1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without performing a peripheral iridotomy (PI) prior to or during surgery ("PI-less DMEK").
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients that underwent PI-less DMEK by a single surgeon (E.L) between February 2016 and February 2017 at the Rabin Medical Center, a Tertiary Hospital. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients, mean age 75.9 ± 7.9 years with 58.1% female were included. Leading indications for surgery were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (18/31) and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (9/31). Preoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity was 1.13 ± 0.59 logMAR (~6/80 Snellen). For 12/31 that had postoperative endothelial cell count measurements, cell loss was 49 ± 20%. Intraoperative complications included anterior chamber (AC) hyphema during graft insertion requiring reinsertion (n = 1), and minor hyphema from the main corneal incision (n = 1). Partial slit lamp gas evacuation was performed in all patients 1.5 h postoperatively. Postoperative complications included partial graft detachment requiring rebubbling (n = 5), self-resolving minimal peripheral graft detachment (n = 5), uncontrolled intraocular hypertension requiring trabeculectomy in a patient with a history of medically controlled glaucoma (n = 1), postoperative cystoid macular edema that resolved medically (n = 1) and graft failure 5 months postoperatively (n = 1). No patients developed pupillary block. Excluding graft failure (n = 1), preoperative amblyopia (n = 2) and premature loss to follow-up (n = 1), final corrected distance visual acuity was 0.18 ± 0.14 logMAR (~20/30 Snellen) with 44.4% reaching 6/7.5 (Snellen) or more.
CONCLUSIONS: PI-Less DMEK is a safe, technically easy, and effective modification that avoids the time and complications associated with performing a PI before or during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30518974      PMCID: PMC6462007          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0294-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  26 in total

1.  Standardized 'no-touch' donor tissue preparation for DALK and DMEK: harvesting undamaged anterior and posterior transplants from the same donor cornea.

Authors:  Esther A Groeneveld-van Beek; Jessica T Lie; Jacqueline van der Wees; Marieke Bruinsma; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Comparison of manual and automated endothelial cell density analysis in normal eyes and DSEK eyes.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Kelly M Fairchild; Francis W Price
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Kyros Moutsouris; Konstantinos Droutsas; Lisanne Ham; Korine van Dijk; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01

4.  Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vasilios S Liarakos; Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Korine van Dijk; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 5.  Trends in corneal transplantation: indications and techniques.

Authors:  Patricia A Ple-Plakon; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Frederico P Guerra; Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Arthur W Giebel; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Frederico P Guerra; Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Arthur W Giebel; Kelly M Fairchild; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; T San Ong; Bob Ververs; Jacqueline van der Wees
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  DMEK Complications.

Authors:  Mark S Gorovoy
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  2 in total

1.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with imported donor corneas in eyes of Asian patients; endothelium-in versus endothelium-out method.

Authors:  Young-Ho Jung; Chang Ho Yoon; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.