| Literature DB >> 26806421 |
Yuki Shimoda1, Jin Kumagai, Mibuki Anzai, Katsuya Kabashima, Kazue Togashi, Yasuko Miura, Hiromitsu Shirasawa, Wataru Sato, Yukiyo Kumazawa, Yukihiro Terada.
Abstract
Contraction during the blastocyst stage is observed during embryonic development of various mammals, including humans, but the physiological role of this process is not well understood. Using time-lapse monitoring (TLM), we studied the influence of vitrification and contractions on embryonic development in mice. Mouse embryos were cultured at the 2-cell stage. At the 8-cell stage, embryos were randomly divided into a fresh group (FG) and vitrified group (VG) and observed for up to 144 h. Strong contractions (i.e., contractions causing a decrease in volume of more than 20% and expansion of the perivitelline space) occurred significantly more often in unhatched embryos than hatching embryos in both groups. Regarding hatching embryos, contractions in the pre-hatching stage were significantly more frequent in the VG than the FG. Furthermore, mRNA expression levels of genes related to contractions were determined at three time points, the 8-cell stage, early blastocyst stage, and 20 h after blastocoel formation, with quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. There was no significant difference in Hspa1a expression between the FG and VG, but Hspa1a overexpression was observed just after thawing and tended to decrease gradually thereafter in some blastocysts. Furthermore, in the VG, Atp1a1 tended to show higher expression in the strong contraction group than in the weak contraction group. Overall, vitrification is an excellent method for cryopreservation but could increase contractions in the pre-hatching stage and may increase energy demands of the embryo. Observation of contraction by TLM may improve the evaluation of embryo quality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26806421 PMCID: PMC4848576 DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2015-150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Dev ISSN: 0916-8818 Impact factor: 2.214
Fig. 1.Timetable of the experimental design. See text for details.
Fig. 2.Definition of contraction types. All images were taken at the same magnification and in the same field of view. The images show contraction from the anteroposterior view of the blastocyst. Arrows indicate the diameter of each blastocyst. (A) An example of strong contraction: the volume reduction is greater than 20%, and is associated with expansion of the perivitelline space. This example shows a 41% volume reduction. (B) Weak contraction: the volume reduction is less than 20%, and is not associated with expansion of the perivitelline space. This example shows a 17% volume reduction.
Primers used in RT-qPCR
| Gene | Sequence (5’–3’) | GenBank accession no. | bp | ||
| Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
( | Reference | For | TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA | NM_008084.3 | 150 |
| Rev | TTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG | ||||
| Heat shock protein 1A | Target | For | GTGGTTGCACTGTAGGACTTGTTTC | NM_010479.2 | 102 |
| Rev | GACCCGAGTTCAGGATGGTTG | ||||
| Myosin, light polypeptide kinase ( | Target | For | CTGCTGTAGCTCAACCCAGATCC | NM_139300.3 | 109 |
| Rev | ACCGCTTCCAGAATGAGACACC | ||||
| ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, alpha 1 polypeptide
( | Target | For | CTGATCAGCATGGCCTATGGAC | NM_144900.2 | 87 |
| Rev | ACCGTTCTCAGCCAGAATCACA |
For, forward; Rev, reverse.
Comparison of the rates of in vitro development to blastocysts and hatching between the fresh group (FG) and vitrified group (VG)
| Condition of embryos | % (no.) of embryos | ||
| Survived | Developed to blastocyst | Hatching | |
| Fresh | – | 97.1 (100/103) | 72 (72/100) |
| Vitrified | 100 (111/111) | 97.3 (108/111) | 66.7 (72/108) |
There was no significant difference in blastocyst rate and hatching rate between the FG and VG. P-values were analyzed with Fisher’s exact test.
Numbers of contractions in the pre-hatching stage in the hatching group (HG) and unhatched group (UG)
| Condition of embryos | Group (n) | Average no. of contractions (25th percentile-median-75th
percentile) | ||
| Total | Strong | Weak | ||
| Fresh | HG (72) | 2.375 (0-1-4)*b | 0.569 (0-0-1)**b | 1.806 (0-1-3) |
| UG (28) | 2.786 (3-2.5-4)a | 1.714 (1-2-2.5)a | 1.071 (0-1-1) | |
| Vitrified | HG (72) | 3.875 (1-3-6) | 1.167 (0-1-2)**b | 2.736 (1-2-4.5)*a |
| UG (36) | 3.722 (3-3.5-5) | 2.333 (1-2-3)a | 1.389 (1-1-2)b | |
The number of contraction was counted for the mean durations from blastocoel formation to the start of hatching. Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). P-values were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Numbers of contractions in the pre-hatching stage in the fresh group (FG) and vitrified group (VG)
| Condition of embryos | Group (n) | Average no. of contractions (25th percentile-median-75th
percentile) | ||
| Total | Strong | Weak | ||
| Hatching | FG (72) | 2.375 (0-1-4)**b | 0.569 (0-0-1)**b | 1.806 (0-1-3)**b |
| VG (72) | 3.875 (1-3-6)a | 1.167 (0-1-2)a | 2.736 (1-2-4.5)a | |
| Unhatched | FG (28) | 2.786 (3-2.5-4)*a | 1.714 (1-2-2.5) | 1.071 (0-1-1) |
| VG (36) | 3.722 (3-3.5-5)b | 2.333 (1-2-3) | 1.389 (1-1-2) | |
The number of contraction was counted for the mean durations from blastocoel formation to the start of hatching. Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). P-values were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Fig. 3.Relative expression (fold change) of mRNA levels of three genes (Hspa1a, Mylk and Atp1a1) in mouse embryos of different stages. At each stage, we extracted RNA from 10 embryos. FG, fresh group (control); VG, vitrified group; SC–, without strong contractions within 20 h after blastocoel formation; SC+, strong contractions occurred within 20 h after blastocoel formation. Data are means ± SEM for 10 embryos per stage from three to five experiments. The relative mRNA expression of Hspa1a (A), Mylk (B) and Atp1a1 (C) was determined at the 8-cell stage, early blastocyst stage and 20 h after blastocoel formation. There was no significant difference between the FG and VG at any stage. There was also no significant difference between the VG (SC–) and VG (SC+) at any stage. P-values were determined with the paired Student’s t-test.