Literature DB >> 20519249

Transfer of a selected single blastocyst optimizes the chance of a healthy term baby: a retrospective population based study in Australia 2004-2007.

Yueping Alex Wang1, Gab Kovacs, Elizabeth Anne Sullivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The practice of single embryo transfer (SET) is highly accepted by clinicians in Australia. This study investigates whether the SET of blastocysts results in optimal perinatal outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective population-based study included 34 035 single or double embryo transfer cycles in women who had their first fresh autologous treatment in Australia during 2004-2007. Pregnancy, live delivery and 'healthy baby' (live born term singleton of > or = 2500 g birthweight and survived for at least 28 days without a notified/reported congenital anomaly) rates per transfer cycle were compared in four groups: selective single embryo transfer (SSET), unselective single embryo transfer (USSET), selective double embryo transfer (SDET) and unselective double embryo transfer (USDET). Live delivery and 'healthy baby' rates per transfer following SSET were further compared by number of embryos available. The analysis was stratified by woman's age and stage of embryo development.
RESULTS: The highest rates of live delivery and 'healthy baby' per transfer cycle (46.2 and 38.0%) were achieved with transfer of a single blastocyst in women aged younger than 35 years. In women aged younger than 40 years, SSET had a significantly higher rate of 'healthy baby' per transfer cycle than did SDET regardless of stage of embryo development. In woman aged younger than 35 years who had SSET, there was no significant difference in live delivery and 'healthy baby' rates per transfer cycle whether two, three, four or five embryos were available. For all of these women, SSET of a cleavage embryo had significantly lower rates of live delivery and 'healthy baby' per transfer cycle compared with SSET of a blastocyst where only two blastocysts were available.
CONCLUSIONS: Consultation with the patient with respect to the advantage of extended culture and selective single blastocyst transfer will result in better success rates following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20519249     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Loss of genomic imprinting in mouse embryos with fast rates of preimplantation development in culture.

Authors:  Brenna A Market Velker; Michelle M Denomme; Mellissa R W Mann
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 2.  Preimplantation embryo metabolism and culture systems: experience from domestic animals and clinical implications.

Authors:  V A Absalón-Medina; W R Butler; R O Gilbert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The live birth and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy among patients with adverse pregnancy outcomes in first frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Jianghui Li; Jiaying Lin; Mingru Yin; Qianqian Zhu; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Morbidity and mortality among very preterm singletons following fertility treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a population cohort study.

Authors:  Alex Y Wang; Abrar A Chughtai; Kei Lui; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shujuan Ma; Yangqin Peng; Liang Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Yiquan Xiong; Yi Tang; Jing Tan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Time-lapse monitoring reveals that vitrification increases the frequency of contraction during the pre-hatching stage in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Yuki Shimoda; Jin Kumagai; Mibuki Anzai; Katsuya Kabashima; Kazue Togashi; Yasuko Miura; Hiromitsu Shirasawa; Wataru Sato; Yukiyo Kumazawa; Yukihiro Terada
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.