Literature DB >> 26804761

Treatment of Presbyopia in Emmetropes Using a Shape-Changing Corneal Inlay: One-Year Clinical Outcomes.

Jeffrey Whitman1, Paul J Dougherty2, Gregory D Parkhurst3, John Olkowski4, Stephen G Slade5, John Hovanesian6, Ralph Chu7, Jon Dishler8, Dan B Tran9, Robert Lehmann10, Harvey Carter11, Roger F Steinert12, Douglas D Koch13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report 1-year safety and efficacy clinical outcomes of a shape-changing corneal inlay for the treatment of presbyopia.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter United States Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT01373580). PARTICIPANTS: Nondominant eyes (N = 373) of emmetropic presbyopic subjects were implanted at 11 sites with the Raindrop Near Vision Inlay (ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, CA); 340 eyes underwent the 1-year follow-up visit.
METHODS: The corneal inlay was implanted under a corneal flap at the center of the light-constricted pupil created with a femtosecond laser. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For subjects completing the 1-year follow-up, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, refractive stability, contrast sensitivity (CS; photopic and mesopic), symptom and satisfaction questionnaire results, and adverse events.
RESULTS: At 1 year in the treated eye, on average, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) improved by 5.1 lines, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) improved by 2.5 lines, and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) decreased by 1.2 lines. From 3 months through 1 year, 93% of subjects achieved UNVA of 20/25 or better, 97% achieve UIVA of 20/32 or better, and 95% achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better. Binocularly, the mean UDVA exceeded 20/20 from 3 months through 1 year. Contrast sensitivity loss occurred only at the highest spatial frequencies, with no loss binocularly. Absent or mild scores were reported in 96% of subjects for visual symptoms (glare, halos, double vision, and fluctuations in vision), in 99% for ocular symptoms (pain, light sensitivity, and discomfort), and in 95% for dryness. Adverse events were treatable and resolved. Eighteen inlays were replaced, usually soon after implantation because of decentration, but UNVA was little affected in this group thereafter. In the 11 cases requiring inlay explantations, 100% achieved a corrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better by 3 months after explant.
CONCLUSIONS: The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay provides significant improvement in near and intermediate visual performance, with no significant change in binocular distance vision or CS. Subject satisfaction is improved significantly with minimal ocular or visual symptoms.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26804761     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Histopathologic Analysis of Explanted KAMRA Corneal Inlays Demonstrating Adherent Fibroconnective Tissue Scar Formation.

Authors:  Grace L Paley; George J Harocopos
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2019-04-17

Review 2.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas-Fragoso; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Diagnostic and Management Tool for Monitoring Patients Implanted with a Shape-Changing Corneal Inlay.

Authors:  Ralph Chu; Briana R Lee
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-02

5.  Comparison of a hydrogel corneal inlay and monovision laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients: focus on visual performance and optical quality.

Authors:  Cornelis Verdoorn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-20

6.  Visual Prognosis after Explantation of a Corneal Shape-Changing Hydrogel Inlay in Presbyopic Eyes.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Benjamin Buckner; David B Rosen; Madeline B Heiland; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; David F Skanchy; Harry Y Liu; Tim Melton; Liliana Werner; Phillip C Jr Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

7.  Biological corneal inlay for presbyopia derived from small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Yu-Chi Liu; Ericia Pei Wen Teo; Heng Pei Ang; Xin Yi Seah; Nyein Chan Lwin; Gary Hin Fai Yam; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

9.  Confocal and Histological Features After Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Corneal Inlay Implantation.

Authors:  Aritz Bidaguren; Javier Mendicute; Iratxe Madarieta; Nerea Garagorri
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.