Literature DB >> 26803775

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10spa) in Colombia. A Blinded Prospective Cohort Study.

Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid1,2, Alejandra María Gutiérrez-Achury3, Karem Ruales-Suárez3, Maria Leonor Rengifo-Varona3, Camilo Barros4, Andrés Posada4, Carlos Romero4, Ana María Galvis3.   

Abstract

Dysphagia might affect 12 % of the general population, and its complications include pneumonia, malnutrition, social isolation, and death. No validated Spanish symptom survey exists to quantify dysphagia symptoms among Latin Americans. Therefore, we performed a prospective cohort study in a tertiary care university hospital to validate the Spanish version of the 10-Item Eating-Assessment-Tool (EAT-10spa) for use in Colombia. After an interdisciplinary committee of five bilingual specialists evaluated the EAT-10spa (translated and validated in Spain) and deemed it appropriate for the Colombian culture, its feasibility, reliability, validity, sensitivity to change, and diagnostic capacity were evaluated. As a reference standard, we used the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing and a standardized clinical evaluation. All assessments were blinded. In total, 133 subjects were included (52 % women, mean age 55 years) and completed the EAT-10spa (median completion time: 2 min [IQR 1-3 min]), 39 % of whom had an elementary-level education. Cronbach's α coefficient: 0.91; test-retest intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.94. The Spearman's correlation coefficient of the EAT-10spa with the 8-point penetration-aspiration scale was 0.54 (P < 0.001). The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUC-ROC) for dysphagia and aspiration were 0.79 (P < 0.001) and 0.81 (P < 0.001), respectively. The best cut-off points for dysphagia and aspiration were EAT-10spa ≥2 (sensitivity 93.6 %, specificity 36.4 %) and EAT-10spa ≥4 (sensitivity 94.3 %, specificity 49.5 %), respectively. A reduction in the EAT-10 ≥3 was the best cut-off point for a clinically significant improvement (AUC-ROC 0.83; P < 0.0001). The EAT-10spa showed excellent psychometric properties and discriminatory capacity for use in Colombia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Quality of life; Reliability; Sensitivity to change

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26803775     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-016-9690-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  34 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Reliability and validity of the Italian Eating Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Francesco Mozzanica; Anna Monzani; Eleonora Ceriani; Murat Atac; Nikolina Jukic-Peladic; Claudia Venturini; Paolo Orlandoni
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique.

Authors:  C H Wu; T Y Hsiao; J C Chen; Y C Chang; S Y Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  F Guillemin; C Bombardier; D Beaton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Measuring Outcomes for Dysphagia: Validity and Reliability of the European Portuguese Eating Assessment Tool (P-EAT-10).

Authors:  Dália Santos Nogueira; Pedro Lopes Ferreira; Elizabeth Azevedo Reis; Inês Sousa Lopes
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Ian J Cook
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 8.  Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior?

Authors:  Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 9.  Disorders of swallowing: palliative care.

Authors:  Susan E Langmore; Gregory Grillone; Alphi Elackattu; Michael Walsh
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Psychometric properties of questionnaires on functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Renée Speyer; Reinie Cordier; Berit Kertscher; Bas J Heijnen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) Using Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  R Cordier; A Joosten; P Clavé; A Schindler; M Bülow; N Demir; S Serel Arslan; R Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Temporal Analysis of Factors Associated with EAT-10 in Outpatients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia from a Tertiary Care Clinic.

Authors:  R S Bartlett; J E Moore; S L Thibeault
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Validity and reliability of the French version of Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

Authors:  Jérôme R Lechien; Gaëtan Cavelier; Marie-Paule Thill; Kathy Huet; Bernard Harmegnies; Laura Bousard; Serge Blecic; Jan Vanderwegen; Alexandra Rodriguez; Didier Dequanter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Cross-cultural Adaption, Validation and Factor Analysis of the Persian Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: EAT-10.

Authors:  Leila Ghelichi; Mohadeseh Hashemian; Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Maryam Tarameshlu
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) in Screening Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ping-Ping Zhang; Ying Yuan; De-Zhi Lu; Ting-Ting Li; Hui Zhang; Hong-Ying Wang; Xiao-Wen Wang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.733

6.  Does the Hebrew Eating Assessment Tool-10 Correlate with Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration and Aspiration on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing?

Authors:  Yael Shapira-Galitz; Ruth Yousovich; Doron Halperin; Michael Wolf; Yonatan Lahav; Michael Drendel
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation.

Authors:  Andrea Oliveira Batista; Weslania Viviane Nascimento; Rachel Aguiar Cassiani; Ana Cristina Viana Silva; Leda Maria Tavares Alves; Dauana Cássia Alves; Roberto Oliveira Dantas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Aspiration in the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Associated with an Increased Risk of Mortality in a Cohort of Patients Suspected of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Authors:  Luis F Giraldo-Cadavid; Jaime A Pantoja; Yency J Forero; Hilda M Gutiérrez; Alirio R Bastidas
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Questionnaires for Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life with Dysphagia in Different Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Zhigang Zhang; Huiya Gao; Yuchen Wu; Huaping Wei; Jiajia Kong; Rui Wang; Jie Cheng; Jinhui Tian
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.733

10.  A prospective study for evaluation of structural and clinical validity of the Eating Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Riitta Möller; Stephanie Safa; Per Östberg
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.