| Literature DB >> 26803608 |
Jacob A Haynes1, Jeffrey B Stambough1, Robert L Barrack1, Denis Nam2.
Abstract
Surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) remains a viable alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in appropriately selected, active adults with degenerative hip disease. However, orthopedic surgeons are facing a number of scenarios where revision of one or both components of an SRA is indicated. Indications for revision vary and impact the potential outcomes of conversion of a SRA to THA. While clinical outcomes are generally favorable, a growing body of data illustrates patients who undergo conversion of a SRA to THA to be at increased risk of requiring a repeat revision surgery and experiencing functional outcomes inferior to that of a primary THA. The results of patients undergoing conversion of a SRA to THA highlight the need for careful patient selection, thorough preoperative counseling, and technical precision when performing a SRA. Furthermore, a systematic approach to the failed SRA is necessary to ensure optimal clinical results.Entities:
Keywords: Aseptic loosening; Femoral neck fracture; Metallosis; Surface replacement arthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty
Year: 2016 PMID: 26803608 PMCID: PMC4762797 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9326-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med ISSN: 1935-9748