| Literature DB >> 26802454 |
Seong-Su Yuk1, Jung-Hoon Kwon1, Jin-Yong Noh1, Woo-Tack Hong1, Gyeong-Bin Gwon1, Jei-Hyun Jeong1, Sol Jeong1, Ha-Na Youn1, Yong-Hwan Heo2, Joong-Bok Lee1, Seung-Yong Park1, In-Soo Choi1, Chang-Seon Song3.
Abstract
A sensitive and specific method for measuring the vaccine titer of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is important to commercial manufacturers for improving vaccine quality. Typically, IBV is titrated in embryonated chicken eggs, and the infectivity of the virus dilutions is determined by assessing clinical signs in the embryos as evidence of viral propagation. In this study, we used a dot-immunoblotting assay (DIA) to measure the titers of IBV vaccines that originated from different pathogenic strains or attenuation methods in embryonated eggs, and we compared this assay to the currently used method, clinical sign evaluation. To compare the two methods, we used real-time reverse transcription-PCR, which had the lowest limit of detection for propagated IBV. As a clinical sign of infection, dwarfism of the embryo was quantified using the embryo: egg (EE) index. The DIA showed 9.41% higher sensitivity and 15.5% higher specificity than the clinical sign determination method. The DIA was particularly useful for measuring the titer of IBV vaccine that did not cause apparent stunting but propagated in embryonated chicken eggs such as a heat-adapted vaccine strain. The results of this study indicate that the DIA is a rapid, sensitive, reliable method for determining IBV vaccine titer in embryonated eggs at a relatively low cost.Entities:
Keywords: Dot-immunoblotting assay; Embryo clinical sign; Infectious bronchitis virus; Titration; Vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26802454 PMCID: PMC7119534 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.01.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Virol Methods ISSN: 0166-0934 Impact factor: 2.014
Titration results of IBV by real-time RT-PCR, clinical sign, and DIA.
| Dilution | RRT-PCR | CS | DIA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M41 | 10−4 | 5/5 (14.42 ± 0.42) | 5/5 (0.664 ± 0.135) | 5/5 |
| 10−5 | 5/5 (14.42 ± 0.41) | 5/5 (0.648 ± 0.089) | 5/5 | |
| 10−6 | 5/5 (14.41 ± 0.69) | 3/5 (0.706 ± 0.200) | 5/5 | |
| 10−7 | 4/5 (14.23 ± 0.56) | 4/5 (0.697 ± 0.251) | 4/5 | |
| 10−8 | 0/5 (nd) | 0/4 (0.964 ± 0.026) | 0/5 | |
| 10−9 | 0/5 (nd) | 1/5 (0.977 ± 0.114) | 0/5 | |
| Titer | 8.4 | 8.3 | 8.4 | |
| KM91 | 10−4 | 5/5 (17.56 ± 0.65) | 4/5 (0.779 ± 0.108) | 5/5 |
| 10−5 | 4/5 (16.74 ± 0.52) | 4/4 (0.839 ± 0.034) | 4/5 | |
| 10−6 | 3/5 (17.43 ± 0.66) | 3/5 (0.765 ± 0.155) | 3/5 | |
| 10−7 | 0/5 (nd) | 2/5 (0.917 ± 0.075) | 0/5 | |
| 10−8 | 0/5 (nd) | 0/5 (0.942 ± 0.030) | 0/5 | |
| 10−9 | 0/5 (nd) | 0/5 (1.023 ± 0.094) | 0/5 | |
| Titer | 7.0 | 7.3 | 7.0 | |
| K2p170 | 10−4 | 5/5 (14.86 ± 0.58) | 5/5 (0.671 ± 0.030) | 5/5 |
| 10−5 | 4/5 (15.28 ± 0.93) | 4/5 (0.755 ± 0.104) | 4/5 | |
| 10−6 | 3/5 (13.81 ± 0.54) | 3/5 (0.777 ± 0.136) | 3/5 | |
| 10−7 | 0/5 (nd) | 1/5 (0.958 ± 0.124) | 0/5 | |
| 10−8 | 0/5 (nd) | 0/5 (1.032 ± 0.062) | 0/5 | |
| 10−9 | 0/5 (nd) | 0/5 (1.042 ± 0.075) | 0/5 | |
| Titer | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.0 | |
| K40/09 | 10−4 | 5/5 (14.64 ± 0.34) | 5/5 (0.674 ± 0.099) | 5/5 |
| 10−5 | 5/5 (14.51 ± 0.21) | 5/5 (0.693 ± 0.053) | 5/5 | |
| 10−6 | 5/5 (14.40 ± 0.48) | 5/5 (0.767 ± 0.066) | 5/5 | |
| 10−7 | 2/5 (15.76 ± 2.27) | 1/4 (0.921 ± 0.156) | 1/5 | |
| 10−8 | 0/5 (nd) | 1/4 (0.989 ± 0.155) | 0/5 | |
| 10−9 | 0/5 (nd) | 0/5 (1.088 ± 0.118) | 0/5 | |
| Titer | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.6 | |
| K40/09HP40 | 10−4 | 5/5 (16.28 ± 0.51) | 5/5 (0.718 ± 0.113) | 5/5 |
| 10−5 | 5/5 (16.14 ± 0.62) | 3/5 (0.776 ± 0.139) | 5/5 | |
| 10−6 | 5/5 (16.50 ±0.25) | 3/4 (0.879 ± 0.252) | 5/5 | |
| 10−7 | 2/5 (22.05 ±8.37) | 0/5 (0.991 ± 0.051) | 1/5 | |
| 10−8 | 2/5 (16.16 ± 0.50) | 1/5 (0.916 ± 0.113) | 2/5 | |
| 10−9 | 0/5 (nd) | 0/5 (1.008 ± 0.050) | 0/5 | |
| Titer | 8.2 | 7.2 | 7.9 | |
Positive/total. Embryos with EE indices below the lowest individual EE index for mock-inoculated ECE (0.880) were classified as positive for clinical sign.
Ct: average cycle threshold ± standard deviation of positives.
EE index: average EE index ± standard deviation. The EE index was defined as the EE ratio of IBV-inoculated ECE divided by the mean EE ratio of mock-inoculated ECE.
Titer: calculated titer by each method (log10(EID50/mL).
Results of the two methods used to assess titer of IBV vaccine.
| Test | True positives | True negatives | Sensitivity | Specificity | ROC analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC | 95% CI | |||||||
| DIA | + | 77 | 0 | 97.25% (77/79) | 100% (71/71) | 0.973 | 98.7% | 95.4–99.9% |
| − | 2 | 71 | ||||||
| CS | + | 65 | 11 | 87.84% (65/74) | 84.50% (60/71) | 0.724 | 86.2% | 79.5–91.4% |
| − | 9 | 60 | ||||||
A non-parametric analysis was performed. κ test, Kappa value; AUC, area under the ROC curve.
Fig. 1ROC curve analysis of clinical sign method of all samples (n = 145) to validate the detection of IBV in allantoic fluids. (A) Results of the ROC analysis for the clinical signs method by each EE index, which was defined by the optimum cut-off value calculated based on the EE index distribution. The ROC plots of the true-positive rate (sensitivity) against the false-positive rate (100-specificity). The diagonal indicates no discriminatory power. The dotted line shows a confidence interval of 95%. (B) Distribution of EE indices using the proposed optimum cut-off line.