Literature DB >> 12243525

Field trial in commercial broilers with a multivalent in ovo vaccine comprising a mixture of live viral vaccines against Marek's disease, infectious bursal disease, Newcastle disease, and fowl pox.

J M Sharma1, Y Zhang, D Jensen, Silke Rautenschlein, H Y Yeh.   

Abstract

A multivalent in ovo vaccine (MIV) was tested for safety and efficacy in a commercial broiler complex. The MIV comprised five replicating live viruses including serotypes 1, 2, and 3 of Marek's disease virus (MDV), an intermediate infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and a recombinant fowl poxvirus (FPV) vector vaccine containing HN and F genes of Newcastle disease virus (NDV). The performance of MIV-vaccinated broilers was compared with that of hatchmates that received turkey herpesvirus (HVT) alone (routinely used in ovo vaccine in the broiler complex). The chickens that hatched from the MIV-injected and HVT-injected eggs were raised under commercial conditions in six barns. Barn 1 housed 17,853 MIV-vaccinated chickens and each of the barns 2-6 housed 18,472-22,798 HVT-vaccinated chickens. The HVT-vaccinated chickens were given infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and NDV vaccines at hatch and at 2 wk of age. The MIV-vaccinated chickens received IBV vaccine at hatch and IBV + NDV at 2 wk of age. The relative values of hatchability of eggs, livability and weight gain of chickens, and condemnation rates at processing were comparable between the MIV and the HVT groups (P > 0.05). Chickens from the MIV- and the HVT-vaccinated groups were challenged with virulent viruses under laboratory conditions. The resistance of vaccinated chickens against Marek's disease could not be assessed because of high natural resistance of unvaccinated commercial broilers to virulent MDV. The relative resistances of the MIV- and the HVT-vaccinated groups, respectively, against other virulent viruses were as follows: IBDV, 100% for both groups; NDV, 81% vs. 19%; FPV, 86% vs. 0%. The successful use of MIV under field conditions expands the usefulness of the in ovo technology for poultry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243525     DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0613:FTICBW]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  5 in total

1.  Strong inflammatory responses and apoptosis in the oviducts of egg-laying hens caused by genotype VIId Newcastle disease virus.

Authors:  Ruiqiao Li; Kangkang Guo; Caihong Liu; Jing Wang; Dan Tan; Xueying Han; Chao Tang; Yanming Zhang; Jingyu Wang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Morphological and Immunohistochemical Examination of Lymphoproliferative Lesions Caused by Marek's Disease Virus in Breeder Chickens.

Authors:  Alessandro Stamilla; Antonino Messina; Lucia Condorelli; Francesca Licitra; Francesco Antoci; Massimiliano Lanza; Guido Ruggero Loria; Giuseppe Cascone; Roberto Puleio
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Effect of TLR agonist on infections bronchitis virus replication and cytokine expression in embryonated chicken eggs.

Authors:  Bal Krishan Sharma; Naresh Kumar Kakker; Sakshi Bhadouriya; Rajesh Chhabra
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.407

4.  Comparison between dot-immunoblotting assay and clinical sign determination method for quantifying avian infectious bronchitis virus vaccine by titration in embryonated eggs.

Authors:  Seong-Su Yuk; Jung-Hoon Kwon; Jin-Yong Noh; Woo-Tack Hong; Gyeong-Bin Gwon; Jei-Hyun Jeong; Sol Jeong; Ha-Na Youn; Yong-Hwan Heo; Joong-Bok Lee; Seung-Yong Park; In-Soo Choi; Chang-Seon Song
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 5.  A Review of Pathogen Transmission at the Backyard Chicken-Wild Bird Interface.

Authors:  Andrea J Ayala; Michael J Yabsley; Sonia M Hernandez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-09-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.