| Literature DB >> 26801757 |
Aarti N Narkhede1, Suresh D Jagtap2, Pallavi S Nirmal3, Shital A Giramkar4, Bhagyashri E Nagarkar5, Omkar P Kulkarni6, Abhay M Harsulkar7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amarkand tubers are routinely used by many Indian tribes as a specialized food for health and longevity but so far there is no scientific evidence for their activities. Taxonomically, Amarkand belong to genera Eulophia and Dioscorea.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26801757 PMCID: PMC4722617 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-0995-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Polyphenolic content of methanolic extract of selected Amarkand plants
| No. | Plant Extract | Polyphenolic content assays | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenol content | Flavonoid content | Proanthocynidin content | ||
| mg/g dry mass | ||||
| 1 | DBB | 1.29 ± 0.03 | 1.43 ± 0.06 | 3.53 ± 0.15 |
| 2 | DBT | 1.45 ± 0.23 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 3.80 ± 0.10 |
| 3 | EO | 1.72 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 9.24 ± 0.50 |
| 4 | EL | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.03 |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3) and all results are equivalent to respective standards
DBB - Dioscorea bulbifera bulbils, DBT - Dioscorea bulbifera tubers, EO - Eulophia ochreata, EL - Eulophia leghapanensis
Fig. 1Effect of extracts of Amarkand tubers on forced swimming capacity in rats on the day 14. Values are expressed as Mean ± SD; n = 8. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 and compared to NC
Effect of Amarkand plants on Creatine content, Hemoglobin concentration and Serum urea nitrogen in rats
| Sr No | Treatment | Creatine (Cr) | Haemoglobin (Hb) | Serum Urea Nitrogen (SUN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/dl | gm% | mg/dl | ||
| 1 | HC | 1.01 ± 0.122 | 13.16 ± 0.917 | 23.58 ± 2.916 |
| 2 | NC | 0.95 ± 0.052 | 12.28 ± 0.966 | 26.43 ± 4.928 |
| 3 | EOL | 1.05 ± 0.074 | 13.62 ± 1.137 | 21.20 ± 1.513* |
| 4 | EOM | 1.21 ± 0.045*** | 14.13 ± 0.771** | 19.46 ± 0.884*** |
| 5 | EOH | 0.81 ± 0.085 | 13.72 ± 0.608* | 20.66 ± 1.676** |
| 6 | ELL | 1.06 ± 0.080 | 13.28 ± 0.722 | 27.53 ± 3.794 |
| 7 | ELM | 1.09 ± 0.111 | 13.10 ± 1.203 | 21.20 ± 1.513* |
| 8 | ELH | 1.14 ± 0.083* | 13.37 ± 0.504 | 30.80 ± 2.343 |
| 9 | DBBL | 1.04 ± 0.175 | 13.75 ± 0.187* | 26.20 ± 1.600 |
| 10 | DBBM | 1.27 ± 0.088*** | 13.35 ± 0.736 | 22.40 ± 4.498 |
| 11 | DBBH | 1.22 ± 0.172*** | 13.30 ± 0.328 | 19.71 ± 2.761** |
| 12 | DBTL | 1.01 ± 0.080 | 13.18 ± 0.865 | 25.83 ± 2.163 |
| 13 | DBTM | 0.96 ± 0.075 | 13.32 ± 0.708 | 23.13 ± 1.420 |
| 14 | DBTH | 1.14 ± 0.027** | 13.27 ± 0.671 | 28.98 ± 3.950 |
In front of all plant codes, abbreviations of their doses are given as, L - lower dose, M - middle dose, H - higher dose
All values are Mean ± SD where n = 6, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared to NC
Fig. 2Effect of Amarkand plants on a) LDH activity and on b) CK activity in rats. Values are expressed as Mean ± SD; n = 8. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared to NC
Fig. 3Effect of extracts of Amarkand tubers on glycogen content in liver and muscle tissues of rats. Values are expressed as Mean ± SD; n = 8. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to NC
Fig. 4Effect of extracts of Amarkand tubers on MDA content in liver and muscle tissues of rats. Values are expressed as Mean ± SD; n = 8. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared to NC