| Literature DB >> 30510739 |
Pan Zhao1, Jing Wang1, Wei Zhao2, Xiaoli Ma3, Haiji Sun1.
Abstract
Chinese rice wine (CRW) is widely known for keeping good health and commonly used in the traditional Chinese medicine prescription guiding drug. This study assesses the effects of CRW on antifatigue and antiaging activities in mice models. Mice were randomly divided into four groups performing with 0.25 ml of distilled water, 0.15, 0.25, and 0.4 ml of CRW for 15 consecutive days. The CRW could obviously increase the content of liver glycogen (LG) and decrease the levels of blood lactic acid (BLA)and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to improve antifatigue ability. In antiaging assay, CRW significantly increased the activity of SOD in liver, the activities of GSH-Px and CAT in brain cortex, body quality, thymus index, and spleen index, and decreased liver MDA levels, liver total cholesterol content, and AChE levels in hippocampus. The CRW has potent antifatigue ability and could minimize the occurrence of age-associated disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese rice wine; antiaging effect; antifatigue activity; antioxidant activity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30510739 PMCID: PMC6261172 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Effects of Chinese rice wine on the contents of liver glycogen (n = 10, . **p < 0.01 compared with control group
Effect of Chinese rice wine on BLA content of mice (n = 10, x ± S, mmol/L)
| Groups | 0 min after swimming | 20 min after swimming | Growth value | Clearance(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5.67 ± 1.39 | 10.85 ± 1.73 | 5.17 ± 2.13 | −91.18 ± 1.06 |
| Low dose | 7.46 ± 0.92 | 7.36 ± 0.63 | −0.1 ± 1.35 | 1.30 ± 0.10 |
| Middle dose | 5.31 ± 0.77 | 4.90 ± 0.43 | −0.41 ± 1.16 | 7.72 ± 0.21 |
| High dose | 7.79 ± 1.78 | 6.55 ± 0.82 | −1.24 ± 1.36 | 15.9 ± 0.60 |
Compared with the control group, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Effect of Chinese rice wine on BUN content of mice (n = 10, x ± S, mmol/L)
| Groups | 0 min after swimming | 30 min after swimming | Growth value | Growth rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 9.78 ± 0.90 | 14.62 ± 0.80 | 4.84 ± 0.62 | 16.13 ± 2.08 |
| Low dose | 11.52 ± 0.54 | 14.81 ± 0.16 | 3.29 ± 0.67 | 10.96 ± 2.22 |
| Middle dose | 10.75 ± 1.24 | 14.23 ± 1.10 | 3.48 ± 0.28 | 11.59 ± 0.93 |
| High dose | 10.62 ± 1.06 | 13.56 ± 1.52 | 2.78 ± 0.59 | 9.28 ± 1.95 |
Compared with control group, *p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effects of Chinese rice wine on SOD (a), MDA (b) and TC (c) in liver of D‐Galactose‐induced aged mice (n = 10, ). ## p < 0.01 vs control group; **p < 0.01 vs aging model control group
Figure 3Effects of Chinese rice wine on GSH‐Px (a) and CAT (b) in cerebral cortex and AChE (c) in the hippocampus of D‐galactose‐induced aged mice (n = 10, ). p < 0.01 vs control group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs aging model control group
Effect of Chinese rice wine on the weight of aging mice (n = 9, x ± S, g)
| Group | Initial body weight | Finial body weight | Body weight growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 34.30 ± 1.85 | 46.77 ± 1.87 | 12.99 ± 2.18 |
| Aging model control | 37.26 ± 1.19 | 42.68 ± 1.11 | 5.42 ± 0.86 |
| CRW 1 | 36.28 ± 0.70 | 46.23 ± 1.39 | 9.95 ± 1.11 |
| CRW 2 | 36.69 ± 0.82 | 47.38 ± 1.19 | 10.68 ± 1.10 |
Compared with aging model control group, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 4Effect of Chinese rice wine on immune organs (thymus and spleen) index of D‐galactose‐induced aged mice (n = 10, ). # p < 0.05, p < 0.01 vs control group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs aging model control group