Literature DB >> 26799597

Gender, Racial, and Health Insurance Differences in the Trend of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Utilization: A United States Experience Over the Last Decade.

Nileshkumar J Patel1, Sushruth Edla2, Abhishek Deshmukh3, Nikhil Nalluri4, Nilay Patel5, Kanishk Agnihotri5, Achint Patel6, Chirag Savani7, Nish Patel1, Ronak Bhimani2, Badal Thakkar8, Shilpkumar Arora9, Deepak Asti4, Apurva O Badheka10, Valay Parikh4, Raul D Mitrani1, Peter Noseworthy3, Hakan Paydak11, Juan Viles-Gonzalez1, Paul A Friedman3, Marcin Kowalski12.   

Abstract

Prior studies have highlighted disparities in cardiac lifesaving procedure utilization, particularly among women and in minorities. Although there has been a significant increase in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion, socioeconomic disparities still exist in the trend of ICD utilization. With the use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2003 through 2011, we identified subjects with ICD insertion (procedure code 37.94) and cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (procedure code 00.50, 00.51) as codified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Overall, 1 020 076 ICDs were implanted in the United States from 2003 to 2011. We observed an initial increase in ICD utilization by 51%, from 95 062 in 2003 to 143 262 in 2006, followed by a more recent decline. The majority of ICDs were implanted in men age ≥65 years. Implantation of ICDs was 2.5× more common in men than in women (402 per million vs 163 per million). Approximately 95% of the ICDs were implanted in insured patients, and 5% were used in the uninsured population. There has been a significant increase in ICD implantation in blacks, from 162 per million in 2003 to 291 per million in 2011. We found a significant difference in the volume of ICD implants between the insured and the uninsured patient populations. Racial disparities have narrowed significantly in comparison with those noted in earlier studies and are now more reflective of the population demographics at large. On the other hand, significant gender disparities continue to exist.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26799597      PMCID: PMC6490817          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  16 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies in a high-risk ICD population.

Authors:  Tobias Schupp; Ibrahim Akin; Linda Reiser; Armin Bollow; Gabriel Taton; Thomas Reichelt; Dominik Ellguth; Niko Engelke; Uzair Ansari; Kambis Mashayekhi; Christel Weiß; Christoph Nienaber; Muharrem Akin; Martin Borggrefe; Michael Behnes
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Trends in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Insertion Between 1988 and 2018 in Olmsted County.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Roshini Asirvatham; Gurukripa N Kowlgi; Ming-Yan Dai; Jordan J Cochuyt; David O Hodge; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Yong Mei Cha
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-08-25

Review 3.  Diversity in modern heart failure trials: Where are we, and where are we going.

Authors:  Uzoma Anaba; Abiodun Ishola; Alisha Alabre; Albert Bui; Marloe Prince; Henry Okafor; Onaopepo Kola-Kehinde; Joshua J Joseph; Darrion Mitchell; Bismarck C Odei; Anezi Uzendu; Karen Patricia Williams; Quinn Capers; Daniel Addison
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.039

4.  Eleven-year trends of inpatient pacemaker implantation in patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  Avirup Guha; Xiao Xiang; Devin Haddad; Benjamin Buck; Xu Gao; Michael Dunleavy; Ellen Liu; Dilesh Patel; Vadim V Fedorov; Emile G Daoud
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Racial Diversity Among American Cardiologists: Implications for the Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Amber E Johnson; Mehret Birru Talabi; Eliana Bonifacino; Alison J Culyba; Esa M Davis; Paula K Davis; Laura M De Castro; Utibe R Essien; Alda Maria Gonzaga; MaCalus V Hogan; Alaina J James; Charles R Jonassaint; Naudia L Jonassaint; Loreta Matheo; Melonie A Nance; G Sarah Napoé; Oladipupo Olafiranye; Sylvia Owusu-Ansah; Tomar N Pierson-Brown; A J Conrad Smith; Tomeka L Suber; Orquidia Torres; Rickquel Tripp; Eloho Ufomata; J Deanna Wilson; Jeannette E South-Paul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 39.918

Review 6.  Racial and ethnic disparities in heart failure: current state and future directions.

Authors:  Sabra C Lewsey; Khadijah Breathett
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.108

7.  Causes of Differences in The Uptake of Cardiac Implantation Electronic Devices in Slovenia in Comparison To Other Countries.

Authors:  Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Renata Erker; Marko Divjak
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2018-01-05

8.  A Map of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Influenza Vaccine Uptake in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program.

Authors:  Laura L Hall; Liou Xu; Salaheddin M Mahmud; Gary A Puckrein; Ed W Thommes; Ayman Chit
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Intervention mediating effects of self-efficacy on patient physical and psychological health following ICD implantation.

Authors:  Ana C S Liberato; Elaine A Thompson; Cynthia M Dougherty
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-07-23

10.  De-adoption and exnovation in the use of carotid revascularization: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Jonathan Skinner; Daniel Gottlieb; Philip Goodney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.