Literature DB >> 26798487

A minimum dataset for a standard transoesphageal echocardiogram: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography.

Richard Wheeler1, Richard Steeds2, Bushra Rana3, Gill Wharton4, Nicola Smith2, Jane Allen4, John Chambers5, Richard Jones6, Guy Lloyd7, Kevin O'Gallagher8, Vishal Sharma9.   

Abstract

A systematic approach to transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is essential to ensure that no pathology is missed during a study. In addition, a standardised approach facilitates the education and training of operators and is helpful when reviewing studies performed in other departments or by different operators. This document produced by the British Society of Echocardiography aims to provide a framework for a standard TOE study. In addition to a minimum dataset, the layout proposes a recommended sequence in which to perform a comprehensive study. It is recommended that this standardised approach is followed when performing TOE in all clinical settings, including intraoperative TOE to ensure important pathology is not missed. Consequently, this document has been prepared with the direct involvement of the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists (ACTA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D echocardiography; guidelines; trans-oesophageal echocardiography

Year:  2015        PMID: 26798487      PMCID: PMC4695669          DOI: 10.1530/ERP-15-0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echo Res Pract        ISSN: 2055-0464


1. Introduction

This document aims to provide a framework for performing an adult transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in a variety of clinical settings such as cardiology outpatients, cardiac theatre, and intensive care. The layout is not only a minimum dataset but also proposes a recommended sequence in which to perform a comprehensive study. This is supported by text that gives a brief description of important issues at each view (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 1, Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10).
Table 1

Assessment of the left ventricle.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (2D) Assessment of LV function: inferoseptum and anterolateral wallsMay require extension of probe to bring apex in to viewFocus can be moved towards the apex to improve quality of imageCareful assessment for apical thrombus/masses
Mid oesophagealTwo-chamber, 80–100° (2D)LVDd/sAssessment of LV function: inferior and anterior wallsMeasurements can be made with 2D calipers for LV dimensions at the junction of the basal and middle thirds of the LV (8)
Mid oesophageal long axis, 120–150° (2D) Assessment of LV function: inferolateral and anteroseptal walls
Table 2

Assessment of the mitral valve.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (2D) Assessment of MV: several sections of the MV can be imaged in this view (see Fig. 1 for a full explanation)Particular attention to the mitral annulus, leaflet morphology, leaflet motion, and the sub-valvular apparatus
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (2D) Assessment of MV: A1/P1Flexion or withdrawal of the probe slightly will bring A1/P1 into viewThe anterolateral commissure can be assessed
Mid oesophagealBi-commissural view, 60–70° (2D)Commissure to commissure annular dimension (end diastole and end systole)Assessment of MV: P3/A2/P1The imaging plane now brings both commissures into viewThis is an appropriate anatomical plane to measure the annular dimension (see Fig. 1)From left to right, the scallops seen in this view are P3/A2/P1 as shown below
Mid oesophagealTwo-chamber, 90° (2D) Assessment of MV: P3/A1
Mid oesophagealPosteromedial commisure, 90° (2D) Assessment of MV: P3/A3The posteromedial commissure can be seen by turning the probe towards the aorta and then coming back to the MV
Mid oesophagealLong axis, 120–150° (2D)Anterior to posterior annulus dimension (end diastole and end systole)Assessment of MV: P2/A2This is the second anatomical plane which allows the mitral annulus to be measured (see Fig. 1)

All of these views should be reassessed with colour flow Doppler over the mitral valve. PW and CW should be used in either the four-chamber or long-axis views

Figure 1

(A) This figure depicts the different sections of the MV that are visualised in the standard mid oesophageal imaging planes. The four-chamber view at 0° is an oblique cut through the MV and will visualise different parts of the valve according to the depth of probe insertion, the degree of flexion/extension and also the anatomical lie of the heart which may vary between patients. This means that A3/A2/A1 extending to P2/P1 may be in view at any one time. It is not usually possible to image A3/P3 at 0°. (B and C) These panels illustrate the correct anatomical planes for annular dimensions – the bi-commissural view (B, major axis) and the long axis view (C, minor axis) (5). These measurements in end diastole and end systole provide useful data for the cardiac surgeon in the setting of mitral repair. There is a paucity of data for normal ranges indexed for body surface area.

Table 3

Assessment of the aortic valve.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealShort axis, 40–60° (2D) Assessment of the AV. Flexion/extension or insertion and withdrawal of the probe will allow imaging above and below the valve making sure to image at the leaflet tips to assess openingThe coronary ostia can be seen above the valve
Mid oesophagealLong axis, 120–150° (2D)LVOT/aortic annulusThe NCC is seen in the near field with the RCC in the far fieldMovement of the probe from left to right is essential in this view to image the extremities of the valve
Mid oesophagealLong axis, 120–150° (2D)LVOT/aortic annulusThe LVOT dimension is measured in mid-systole from the septal endocardium to the anterior mitral valve leaflet ∼0.5–1 cm from the valve orifice (6) The aortic ‘annulus’ is measured from the hinge points of the AV in mid-systole

These views should be repeated with colour flow Doppler. Alignment is not possible for spectral Doppler. The four-chamber mid-oesophageal view can also be used with slight flexion or withdrawal of the probe in order to assess the ventricular aspect of the AV and also to image aortic regurgitation.

Table 4

Assessment of the left atrium and left atrial appendage.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (2D)LA dimension in two axesThe probe needs to be moved from left to right to image all parts of the LA completelyThe LA area/volume can be difficult to obtain from TOE due to the proximity to the transducer.Dimensions in two axes can be measured in this view (semi-quantitative)
Mid oesophagealTwo-chamber, 90° (2D) As above, movement of the probe from left to right will maximise the chance of imaging all corners of the LA
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (2D) The LAA can be imaged often helped by flexion or withdrawal of the probe slightlyCareful attention should be made to distinguish pectinate muscles from thrombusThe depth and focus can be adjusted to maximise the quality
Mid oesophagealLAA view, 60–130° (2D) It is essential to image the LAA in at least two planes. One or more lobes can be seen when the multiplane is turned beyond 90°Movement of the probe to the left can keep the LAA in viewLook out for spontaneous echo contrast
Mid oesophagealLAA view, 0–130° (CFM) Colour Doppler can help assess the extent of the LAA cavity
Mid oesophagealLAA view, 0–130° (PW)Emptying velocitiesPW Doppler can be placed within the mouth of the LAA (not more than 1 cm) in order to quantify emptying velocities
Table 5

Assessment of the inter-atrial septum.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealIAS, 0–20° (2D) The interatrial septum is well seen on TOE due to its close proximity to the transducerLipomatous hypertrophy is frequently seen in this view
Mid oesophagealIAS, 40–80° (2D) The presence of a patent foramen ovale can be assessed in this view. Note the insertion of the Eustachian valve near the inferior vena cava in the right atrium
Mid oesophagealBicaval, 80–120° (2D) It is essential to image the IAS in multiple views to exclude ASD/PFO. Sinus venosus defects can be easily missed by incomplete imaging of the IAS near the insertion of the IVC and SVC

All of these views should be repeated with colour flow Doppler to look for ASD/PFO. Reducing the Nyquist limit may help to visualise low velocity flow across the septum. Always remember to reset the Nyquist limit for the rest of the study.

Table 6

Assessment of the pulmonary veins.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (CFM) The upper pulmonary veins tend to insert more vertically into the LA. Flexion or withdrawal of the probe can bring into viewNote the close relationship of the LUPV to the LAA
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (CFM) The lower pulmonary veins tend to insert more horizontally into the LA.Inserting the probe further and turning further to the left can help image the LLPV
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (CFM) After turning the probe to the right, flexion or withdrawal of the probe can help image the RUPV
Mid oesophagealModified bicaval view, 90–110° (CFM) The RUPV can often be easier to image by starting with the bicaval view to visualise the SVC and then turning the probe further to the right whilst keeping the colour Doppler in position
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (CFM) Inserting the probe further and turning the probe to the right can bring in the RLPV
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (PW) The PW cursor is placed 1 cm into the mouth of any pulmonary vein but usually the LUPV is the best alignedTwo pulmonary veins should be analysed in each patient
Table 7

Assessment of right heart.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (2D) The right ventricle can be assessed in more detail for regional and global functionThe septal leaflet is on the right with the anterior or posterior leaflet on the left depending on how far the probe is inserted (7)
Mid oesophagealFour-chamber, 0–20° (2D)RV sizeTricuspid annulusRV size can be assessed at the base and the mid point in end diastole (8) The tricuspid annulus can be measured at end systole and end systole from hinge point to hinge point a
Mid oesophagealRV inflow/outflow, 60–80° (2D) Regional and global RV function can be further assessedThe posterior leaflet is on the left with the anterior leaflet to the rightThe pulmonary valve can also be seen in this view
Mid oesophageal modified RV inflow, 110–130° (2D) The tricuspid valve can also be imaged at this multiplane angle aided by turning the probe to the right
Mid oesophageal modified RV inflow, 110–130° (CFM) This view often allows TR to be assessed using CW Doppler due to the vertical alignment
Mid oesophageal modified RV inflow, 110–130° (CW)TR VmaxDoppler estimate of RVSP may be performed
Mid oesophagealRV outflow, 60–80° (2D)Pulmonary valve annulusThe pulmonary valve is often better imaged by using the zoom
Mid oesophagealMain PA, 0° (2D)Main pulmonary arteryThe main pulmonary artery can be imaged by withdrawing the probe slightly at 0°. The pulmonary artery bifurcation is well seen with the right main pulmonary artery heading behind the ascending aorta
Mid oesophagealMain PA, 0° (CFM) Colour Doppler will demonstrate flow towards the transducer in systole

All of these views should be repeated with colour flow Doppler to assess the tricuspid and pulmonary valves. PW/CW can be used to assess flow through the pulmonary valve in the mid oesophageal view at 0°.

Tricuspid annular dimensions in the four-chamber view provide useful data for the cardiac surgeon in the setting of tricuspid repair. There is a paucity of data regarding normal ranges indexed for body surface area.

Table 8

Transgastric views – assessment of the left ventricle.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Transgastric mid LV short axis, 0–20° (2D)IVSdLVDd/sAfter insertion of the probe into the stomach, flexion will bring this image into viewRegional and global LV systolic function can be assessedChamber dimensions can be measured either with 2D calipers or M-mode placed vertically within the sector (8)
TransgastricBasal LV short axis, 0–20° (2D) Withdrawing the probe slightly will image the base of the LV with the MV enfaceThis is a good view for assessing the mitral commissures and imaging the site of MR with colour Doppler
TransgastricTwo-chamber, 80–100° (2D)LVDd/sThe inferior wall is seen within the near field with the anterior wall in the far fieldLV dimensions may be obtained by 2D callipers or M-mode as for the short axis views (8) This view is the best for assessing chordal pathology and length
Transgastric long axis 90–120° (2D, CFM, PW, CW) Turning the probe slightly to the right may help image the AV
Transgastric long axis, 90–120° (PW, CW)PW LVOTCW AVmaxColour Doppler guides the alignment of PW in the LVOT and CW through the AV
The mid oesophageal views do not allow spectral doppler analysis of the AV
Deep transgastric, 0° (2D, CFM, PW, CW)PW LVOTCW AVmaxThe probe is inserted further in to the stomach with flexion in order to obtain this image which is similar to a transthoracic apical five-chamber viewColour Doppler can guide the use of PW in the LVOT and CW through the AV
Table 9

Transgastric assessment of the right heart.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
TransgastricShort axis RV, 0–20° (2D) All three leaflets of the tricuspid valve can be seen in this view. RV regional and global function can be assessed
TransgastricRV inflow, 80–100° (2D) The tricuspid leaflets and the subvalvular apparatus are well seen. This is also an excellent view for assessment of pacing wires in the RV
Table 10

Assessment of the aorta.

View (modality) Measurement Explanatory note Image
Mid oesophagealLong axis aortic root, 120–150° (2D)Sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and ascending aortaInternal dimensions can be measured in mid diastole (8) Measurements at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva should be indexed for body surface area (9)
Mid oesophagealLong axisAscending aorta, 100–120° (2D)Ascending aortaThe upper ascending aorta can be imaged by withdrawing the probe slightly and reducing the multiplane angleThe right pulmonary artery is in the near field
Mid oesophagealShort axisAscending aorta, 0° (2D) Withdrawal of the probe will image the ascending aorta in short axis above the leaflets of the AVThe main pulmonary artery is on the right
Mid oesophagealDescending thoracic aorta, 0° (2D)Descending thoracic aortaThe entire thoracic aorta can be assessed by withdrawing the probe. Abnormalities can be annotated at a level corresponding with the distance from the incisors as marked on the probe
Mid oesophagealDescending thoracic aorta, 90° (2D)Descending thoracic aortaAtheromatous plaque is often well seen in the long axis view
Upper oesophagusAortic arch, 0° (2D) The upper oesophageal views are often poorly tolerated by the patient. The probe is turned to the right to keep the aorta in view. The proximal arch is to the left with the distal arch to the right
Assessment of the left ventricle. Assessment of the mitral valve. All of these views should be reassessed with colour flow Doppler over the mitral valve. PW and CW should be used in either the four-chamber or long-axis views (A) This figure depicts the different sections of the MV that are visualised in the standard mid oesophageal imaging planes. The four-chamber view at 0° is an oblique cut through the MV and will visualise different parts of the valve according to the depth of probe insertion, the degree of flexion/extension and also the anatomical lie of the heart which may vary between patients. This means that A3/A2/A1 extending to P2/P1 may be in view at any one time. It is not usually possible to image A3/P3 at 0°. (B and C) These panels illustrate the correct anatomical planes for annular dimensions – the bi-commissural view (B, major axis) and the long axis view (C, minor axis) (5). These measurements in end diastole and end systole provide useful data for the cardiac surgeon in the setting of mitral repair. There is a paucity of data for normal ranges indexed for body surface area. Assessment of the aortic valve. These views should be repeated with colour flow Doppler. Alignment is not possible for spectral Doppler. The four-chamber mid-oesophageal view can also be used with slight flexion or withdrawal of the probe in order to assess the ventricular aspect of the AV and also to image aortic regurgitation. Assessment of the left atrium and left atrial appendage. Assessment of the inter-atrial septum. All of these views should be repeated with colour flow Doppler to look for ASD/PFO. Reducing the Nyquist limit may help to visualise low velocity flow across the septum. Always remember to reset the Nyquist limit for the rest of the study. Assessment of the pulmonary veins. Assessment of right heart. All of these views should be repeated with colour flow Doppler to assess the tricuspid and pulmonary valves. PW/CW can be used to assess flow through the pulmonary valve in the mid oesophageal view at 0°. Tricuspid annular dimensions in the four-chamber view provide useful data for the cardiac surgeon in the setting of tricuspid repair. There is a paucity of data regarding normal ranges indexed for body surface area. Transgastric views – assessment of the left ventricle. Transgastric assessment of the right heart. Assessment of the aorta. This will hopefully promote a systematic approach to TOE, which is critical not only for education and training, but also when reviewing studies performed by different operators or in different hospital sites. It is recognised that not all views may be possible in patients and in particular there are certain views that are sometimes poorly tolerated e.g. deep transgastric, upper oesophageal. The decision to omit various views must therefore be made by the operator taking into account the balance between the risks of inadequate data vs patient safety and comfort.

2. Patient safety

TOE is semi-invasive with the potential for serious albeit rare complications. The indications, risks, and precautions for TOE have been described previously (1, 2). It is mandatory to have a routine checklist for certain conditions and problems that may either contraindicate the study or be a cause for concern; e.g., oesophageal stricture, previous gastro-oesophageal surgery, and loose teeth/dentures. This checklist should be documented, preferably in a specific transoesophageal document/care-plan within the medical notes. The British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) and the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists (ACTA) have produced a checklist that may be used for this purpose (3). Conscious sedation is used in many units as a routine to facilitate TOE. Only individuals trained in the use of such techniques should administer sedative drugs. Continuous monitoring of oxygen saturations during and after the procedure is mandatory with full resuscitation equipment being readily available. The BSE has produced guidance for the safe use of sedation (10). Echo labs should have written protocols for the decontamination of probes and sterility of the procedure room. These protocols can be based on the BSE guidance for probe decontamination but should be agreed by the local trust and infection control departments (11).

3. Identifying information

Patient name. A second unique identifier such as hospital number or date of birth. Identification of the operator; e.g., initials.

4. Electrocardiogram

An electrocardiogram should be attached ensuring good tracings to facilitate the acquisition of complete digital loops.

5. Intraoperative TOE

Intraoperative TOE is now a well-established procedure that may involve cardiologists, cardiothoracic anaesthetists or cardiac physiologists. It is strongly recommended that such studies follow precisely the same format as a TOE performed in different settings; e.g., a diagnostic study in cardiology outpatients. This approach has a sound medico-legal justification and minimises the risk of missing important diagnoses that may not be apparent on the preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). With this in mind, this document has been prepared with the direct involvement of the ACTA and its representatives Justiaan Swanevelder, David Duthie, Donna Greenhalgh, Niall O'Keeffe, and Nick Fletcher. To that end, intraoperative TOE needs to be well coordinated in order to allow time for a complete study. It is desirable to obtain most of the data before the chest/pericardium is open as this may affect the images; e.g., dimensions of the tricuspid annulus. The clinician must be aware that the physiology of the patient may be significantly different during intraoperative TOE due to the effects of general anaesthesia, fluid status, or vasoactive drugs. This is an important principle in deciding whether the TOE data should be obtained before the patient is listed for surgery. The most widely quoted example is in the assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation, which may be misinterpreted depending on the physiology at the time of the study.

6. Duration

It is recommended that 45–60 min is allowed for each TOE. This includes preparation of the patient, e.g., cannulation, consent etc., and may also include a pre-procedure TTE. This should be done in accordance with the BSE guidelines for TTE (4). However it is recognised that certain clinical circumstances may necessitate a more focused approach to the image acquisition but this is a clinical judgement.

7. Reporting

All studies should be completed by issuing a formal report that is documented within the patient's medical records. Ideally this should be in the form of a standardised computerised report available on all contemporary echo systems. The TOE images should be stored in a format that is reliable and easy to access for review. It is recommended that this take the form of digital storage with regular server back up.

8. Measurements

This document indicates several measurements that can be made during a routine TOE. However, it is expected that the vast majority of patients will have already have had TTE. There is a more extensive evidence base for TTE measurements and therefore these should be used where possible. Some TOE measurements are difficult to perform due to proximity of the transducer; e.g., left atrial (LA) dimensions. Some measurements may be prone to error if off-axis images have been obtained, e.g., left ventricular dimensions. However, certain measurements, e.g. annular dimensions or aortic root size, are usually more precise on TOE.

Abbreviations

Abbreviations

2DTwo-dimensional
A1, A2, A3Scallops of anterior mitral valve leaflet
ASDAtrial septal defect
AVAortic valve
CFMColour flow Doppler
CWContinuous wave Doppler
ECGElectrocardiogram
IASInteratrial septum
IVCInferior vena cava
IVSd/sInter ventricular septal dimension in diastole and systole
LALeft atrium
LAALeft atrial appendage
LLPVLeft lower pulmonary vein
LUPVLeft upper pulmonary vein
LVLeft ventricle
LVDd/sLeft ventricular diameter in diastole and systole
LVOTLeft ventricular outflow tract
MRMitral regurgitation
NCCNon coronary cusp
P1, P2, P3Scallops of posterior mitral valve leaflet
PAPulmonary artery
PFOPatent foramen ovale
PWPulse wave Doppler
RARight atrium
RCCRight coronary cusp
RLPVRight lower pulmonary vein
RUPVRight upper pulmonary vein
RVRight ventricle
RVdRight ventricular cavity diameter in diastole
RVSPRight ventricular systolic pressure
SVCSuperior vena cava
TOETransoesophageal echocardiography
TRTricuspid regurgitation
TTETransthoracic echocardiogram
  8 in total

1.  Guidelines for transoesophageal echocardiographic probe cleaning and disinfection from the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  P Kanagala; C Bradley; P Hoffman; R P Steeds
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-10

2.  Recommendations for transoesophageal echocardiography: update 2010.

Authors:  F A Flachskampf; L Badano; W G Daniel; R O Feneck; K F Fox; Alan G Fraser; Agnes Pasquet; M Pepi; L Perez de Isla; J L Zamorano; J R T C Roelandt; L Piérard
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-08

3.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 4.  Anatomy, echocardiography, and normal right ventricular dimensions.

Authors:  S Y Ho; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-12-08

6.  Accurate measurement of mitral annular dimensions by echocardiography: importance of correctly aligned imaging planes and anatomic landmarks.

Authors:  Gary P Foster; Adam K Dunn; Selwin Abraham; Naser Ahmadi; Guilda Sarraf
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Theodore Abraham; Mark S Adams; Charles J Bruce; Kathryn E Glas; Roberto M Lang; Scott T Reeves; Jack S Shanewise; Samuel C Siu; William Stewart; Michael H Picard
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  A minimum dataset for a standard adult transthoracic echocardiogram: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Gill Wharton; Richard Steeds; Jane Allen; Hollie Phillips; Richard Jones; Prathap Kanagala; Guy Lloyd; Navroz Masani; Thomas Mathew; David Oxborough; Bushra Rana; Julie Sandoval; Richard Wheeler; Kevin O'Gallagher; Vishal Sharma
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2015-02-17
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  'CLAS' score: an objective tool to standardize and predict mitral valve repairability.

Authors:  Amber Malhotra; Sumbul Siddiqui; Vivek Wadhawa; Himani Pandya; Kartik Patel; Komal Shah; Hemang Gandhi; Pankaj Garg; Sudhir Adalti; Kamal Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-10-09

2.  Modified Duke/European Society of Cardiology 2015 clinical criteria for infective endocarditis: time for an update?

Authors:  Alfonso Jan Kemp Pecoraro; Philipus George Herbst; Colette Pienaar; Jantjie Taljaard; Hans Prozesky; Jacques Janson; Anton Frans Doubell
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-05

3.  Personalized physiologic flow waveforms improve wave reflection estimates compared to triangular flow waveforms in adults.

Authors:  Ninette Shenouda; Joseph M Stock; Jordan C Patik; Julio A Chirinos; David G Edwards
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Pulsatile load and wasted pressure effort are reduced following an acute bout of aerobic exercise.

Authors:  Jordan C Patik; Joseph M Stock; Ninette Shenouda; Nicholas V Chouramanis; Justin D Mehrer; Julio A Chirinos; David G Edwards
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2021-05-13

5.  TOE imaging of a large aortic mass: an unusual cause of systemic embolization in a septic patient.

Authors:  Sarah R Blake; Jamal N Khan; Adrian Chenzbraun
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-23

Review 6.  The modern role of transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of valvular pathologies.

Authors:  Malgorzata Wamil; Sacha Bull; James Newton
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Echocardiographic assessment of the tricuspid and pulmonary valves: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Abbas Zaidi; David Oxborough; Daniel X Augustine; Radwa Bedair; Allan Harkness; Bushra Rana; Shaun Robinson; Luigi P Badano
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2020-12

8.  Early surgery determines prognosis in patients with infective endocarditis: outcome in patients managed by an Endocarditis Team-a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alfonso J K Pecoraro; Philipus G Herbst; Jacques T Janson; Riegardt Wagenaar; Zane Ismail; Jantjie J Taljaard; Hans W Prozesky; Colette Pienaar; Anton F Doubell
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-08

Review 9.  Quality Assurance and Improvement Project in Echocardiography Laboratory: The Pivotal Importance of Organizational and Managerial Processes.

Authors:  Antoine Kossaify
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2021-04-22

10.  British Society of Echocardiography Departmental Accreditation Standards 2019 with input from the Intensive Care Society.

Authors:  Sarah Ritzmann; Stephanie Baker; Marcus Peck; Tom E Ingram; Jane Allen; Laura Duffy; Richard P Steeds; Andrew Houghton; Andrew Elkington; Nina Bual; Robert Huggett; Keith Pearce; Stavros Apostolakis; Khalatabari Afshin
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2020-02-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.