| Literature DB >> 33339003 |
Abbas Zaidi1, David Oxborough2,3, Daniel X Augustine4,5, Radwa Bedair6, Allan Harkness7, Bushra Rana8, Shaun Robinson9, Luigi P Badano10,11.
Abstract
Transthoracic echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality in the assessment of right-sided valve disease. The principle objectives of the echocardiographic study are to determine the aetiology, mechanism and severity of valvular dysfunction, as well as consequences on right heart remodelling and estimations of pulmonary artery pressure. Echocardiographic data must be integrated with symptoms, to inform optimal timing and technique of interventions. The most common tricuspid valve abnormality is regurgitation secondary to annular dilatation in the context of atrial fibrillation or left-sided heart disease. Significant pulmonary valve disease is most commonly seen in congenital heart abnormalities. The aetiology and mechanism of tricuspid and pulmonary valve disease can usually be identified by 2D assessment of leaflet morphology and motion. Colour flow and spectral Doppler are required for assessment of severity, which must integrate data from multiple imaging planes and modalities. Transoesophageal echo is used when transthoracic data is incomplete, although the anterior position of the right heart means that transthoracic imaging is often superior. Three-dimensional echocardiography is a pivotal tool for accurate quantification of right ventricular volumes and regurgitant lesion severity, anatomical characterisation of valve morphology and remodelling pattern, and procedural guidance for catheter-based interventions. Exercise echocardiography may be used to elucidate symptom status and demonstrate functional reserve. Cardiac magnetic resonance and CT should be considered for complimentary data including right ventricular volume quantification, and precise cardiac and extracardiac anatomy. This British Society of Echocardiography guideline aims to give practical advice on the standardised acquisition and interpretation of echocardiographic data relating to the pulmonary and tricuspid valves.Entities:
Keywords: echocardiography; guideline; pulmonary valve; tricuspid valve
Year: 2020 PMID: 33339003 PMCID: PMC8052586 DOI: 10.1530/ERP-20-0033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Echo Res Pract ISSN: 2055-0464
Figure 1Transthoracic PLAX RV inflow imaging planes through the TV (9). If the interventricular septum and CS can be seen, the image will most likely demonstrate the septal ± anterior leaflets of the TV (panel A). If the septum and CS are not seen, it is likely to be the anterior and posterior leaflets that are imaged (panel B). Panel B also demonstrates the anatomical relationship between the TV and the anterior and inferior walls of the RV, the liver and the diaphragm. A indicates anterior leaflet of the TV; CS, coronary sinus; IVC, inferior vena cava; P, posterior TV leaflet; S, septal TV leaflet.
Figure 2Transthoracic apical 4-chamber and 5-chamber views of the TV(9). If the LV outflow tract is visible, the septal and anterior TV leaflets are likely to be in view (panel A). If the LVOT and CS are not seen, the septal and anterior or posterior TV leaflets are most likely to be visualised (panel B). If the CS is in view, the septal and posterior TV leaflets are likely to be imaged (line C). A indicates anterior TV leaflet; P, posterior TV leaflet; S, septal TV leaflet.
Figure 3Pacemaker lead-associated TR. Left image, 2D A4C view. An RV pacing lead can be seen crossing the TV (white arrow). Right image, TOE 3D live zoom image of the RA en face view of the TV. As the leaflets of the TV close in systole, the septal leaflet appears tethered and fixed to the pacing lead, with a large coaptation defect, with resultant severe TR. White dotted line, TV annulus; IAS, interatrial septum position; AV, aortic valve; A and S, anterior and septal TV leaflets.
Transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment of the tricuspid and pulmonary valves.
| View (modality) | Measurement | Explanatory notes | Image |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLAX RV inflow (2D) | Qualitative inspection of the TV. The leaflet to the right of the image sector is usually the anterior leaflet. The image to the left of the sector may be the septal or posterior leaflet. | ||
| Note any leaflet thickening or calcification, prolapse or flail segments, large coaptation defect or vegetation. | |||
| Figure 1 for illustration of different cut planes through the TV leaflets from this window. | |||
| Variable view (3D imaging) | 3D live zoom images of the TV. The left image shows the RV en face view. The right image shows the RA en face view. | ||
| 3D live zoom dataset acquired from the TTE parasternal tricuspid valve inflow view. Multi-plane reconstruction software allows rapid segmental analysis of the valve leaflets and associated landmarks. | |||
| PLAX RV inflow (CFM) | Assessment of TR severity | ||
| VC width | See ‘A4C (CFM)’ for details | ||
| Variable view (3D CFM imaging) | See ‘A4C (CFM)’ for details of 2D VC assessment. | ||
| Multiplane reconstruction of the live 3D colour Doppler dataset allows precise quantification of the VC through optimal alignment with its long and short axis, as well as tracing the VC area at this level. | |||
| Red lines depict the level of the vena contracta in each view. | |||
| VC area | By 3D echo, VC area >0.4 cm2 is consistent with severe TR (48, 49). | ||
| PLAX RV inflow (CW) | TR Vmax | See A4C CW for details. | |
| PSAX TV (2D) | Qualitative inspection of the TV leaflets. The leaflet adjacent to the aorta is either the septal or anterior leaflet. The leaflet adjacent to the RV free wall is usually the posterior leaflet. | ||
| PSAX RVOT (2D) | RVOT1 (proximal RVOT) | Refer to BSE Right Heart guideline for details (1). | |
| RVOT2 (distal RVOT) | Refer to BSE Right Heart guideline for details (1). | ||
| PSAX PA (2D) | Qualitative assessment of PV leaflet morphology, leaflet thickening, systolic doming, loss of coaptation, prolapse, or presence of subvalvar or supravalvar (including branch) PS. | ||
| Pulmonary artery (PA) diameter | PA dimension is measured in end-diastole, halfway between the PV and bifurcation of main PA (22), or 1 cm distal to the PA. A diameter > 25 mm is considered abnormal (64). A dilated PA may indicate pulmonary hypertension as a cause for PR. | ||
| PSAX RVOT (CFM) | Qualitative assessment of PR. Physiological PR jets are usually small, central and spindle-shaped (see image). Mild PR is likely if the jet has a narrow vena contracta and is <10 mm in length (21). Visual assessment of the level of any stenotic lesion by location of flow acceleration. | ||
| Severe PR is likely if the jet originates from or beyond the PA bifurcation. Caution: severe (‘free’) PR may be laminar, hence not easily seen on colour flow mode. | |||
| PSAX RVOT (CFM) | PR jet width/RVOT width | Maximal jet width is measured in diastole immediately below the PV. Jet width >65% of the RVOT width (RVOT2) is an indicator of severe PR (21). Caution: this measurement will vary according to the cut plane through the RVOT. | |
| Visual assessment for diastolic flow reversal in a branch PA, which is a marker of severe PR. This has much greater specificity for CMR-derived severe PR than flow reversal in the main PA (68). The figure shows severe PR with large flow convergence, and flow reversal in the right pulmonary artery. | |||
| PSAX RVOT (CW) | Qualitative inspection of the CW signal morphology. Right atrial contraction may be seen as late diastolic forward flow in the CW Doppler profile through the RVOT/PA (red arrows). This signal may be more prominent during inspiration and is a marker of restrictive RV physiology. | ||
| PA Vmax
| <3 m/s is consistent with mild, 3–4 m/s moderate, and >4 m/s severe pulmonary stenosis (19). Visual assessment (2D) and PW Doppler are used to differentiate subvalvular, valvular and supravalvular PS. See red arrow on image. | ||
| PR pressure half time | The time taken for the PR pressure to halve is equivalent to initial velocity divided by 1.41. PR PHT< 100 ms is suggestive of severe PR (70). Note that this measure will be shorter in restrictive RV physiology. See white line on figure. | ||
| PSAX RVOT (PW) | Can be used to determine the level of obstruction (subvalvular, valvular or supravalvar) if PA Vmax is elevated. | ||
| Can also be used in the volumetric technique for calculating TR and PR regurgitant fractions (assuming only one significant regurgitant lesion exists): | |||
| RVOT area = π × (0.5 RVOT diameter)2 | |||
| RV stroke vol = RVOT area × RVOT VTI | |||
| Regurgitant volume = RV SV – LV SV | |||
| Regurgitant fraction = (regurgitant volume/RV stroke volume) ×100 | |||
| PSAX branch PA (PW) | Assessment for diastolic flow reversal in a branch PA, which is a marker of severe PR. See ‘PSAX RVOT (CFM)’ section previously. | ||
| RV-focused A4C (2D) | Right atrial area (RAA) | All measurements taken at end-diastole in the RV-focused view. Refer to BSE Right Heart guideline for details (1). | |
| RV linear dimensions RVD1, RVD2, RVD3 | |||
| RV fractional area change (FAC) | |||
| RV-focused A4C (2D) | Qualitative inspection of the TV leaflets. The septal leaflet is adjacent to the septum and the anterior or posterior leaflet is seen adjacent to the lateral RV free wall. Visual inspection for reduced leaflet coaptation. | ||
| RV focused A4C (2D) | TV tenting area | Measured at end-systole as the area between the tricuspid annulus and the atrial aspect of the leaflets (red triangle). A tenting area >1 cm2 is predictive of more than mild secondary TR (18). A tenting area >1.6 cm2 is predictive of significant residual TR after TV surgery (62). | |
| A4C (M-mode) | Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) | Refer to BSE Right Heart guideline for details (1). | |
| A4C (CFM) | Visual assessment of TR severity. A very large central jet, or eccentric wall-impinging jet should alert to the possibility of severe TR. | ||
| TR VC width | The width of the TR jet at its narrowest point immediately after the regurgitant orifice (white line). | ||
| A4C (CFM) | TR jet area | TR jet area > 10.0 cm2 suggests severe TR (6). A large, central jet occupying >50% of the RA is also suggestive of severe TR (6). | |
| Caution: central jets generally appear larger than eccentric jets of equal severity. A swirling, eccentric, wall impinging jet (Coanda effect) reaching the posterior RA wall suggests severe TR. | |||
| Caution: free-flowing severe TR may be low velocity and therefore non-aliaising. Jet area will underestimate TR severity in these circumstances. | |||
| A4C (PW) | The view should be optimised in order to align the ultrasound beam with tricuspid inflow. This may require an unconventional/oblique angulation. TV inflow velocities vary with respiration, hence averaging should be performed over 5 beats. | ||
| TV area | TV area is calculated as 190/PHT. A value ≤1.0 cm2 indicates severe TS (4). | ||
| A4C (CW) | Qualitative assessment of TR severity. Mild TR has a soft jet density and parabolic contour. Severe TR has a dense CW jet and early peaking or triangular CW envelope. See image – the TR jet density is similar to that of the forward tricuspid inflow signal density, and may appear like a ‘sine wave’ in very severe TR. Caution: central jets may appear denser than eccentric jets of similar severity. | ||
| Peak TR velocity | TR Vmax is measured by CW Doppler across the tricuspid valve. Multiple views may need to be taken to obtain the optimal window. | ||
| See Pulmonary Hypertension protocol for details (69). | |||
| Calculated from the PISA radius, aliaising velocity, and peak TR velocity. EROA ≥ 0.4 cm2 is consistent with severe, 0.2–0.39 cm2 moderate, and <0.2 cm2 mild TR (6). | |||
| TR regurgitant volume | Calculated from the EROA multiplied by the TR VTI (area inside the red outline in figure). Regurgitant volume ≥45 mL is consistent with severe, 30–44 mL moderate, and <30 mL mild TR (6). | ||
| Note that for a similar EROA, TV regurgitant volume is lower than for the MV, due to the lower driving pressure from the RV across the TV. TR regurgitant volume is subject to the same limitations as EROA (see previously). | |||
| A4C (tissue Doppler) | RV S’ | Refer to BSE Right Heart guideline for details (1). | |
| Subcostal (CFM) | Qualitative inspection of TR. | ||
| Subcostal (CW) | Assessment of TR severity and TR Vmax | See A4C (CW). May be performed if good Doppler alignment with TR jet. | |
| Subcostal (2D) | IVC diameter | Diameter is measured perpendicular to the IVC long axis, 1–2 cm from the IVC/RA junction at end-expiration. | |
| Assess size and percentage reduction in diameter with sniffing or quiet inspiration (22, 64). | |||
| IVC diameter ≤ 21 mm, with >50% collapse with sniff suggests normal RA pressure and indicates that severe TR is unlikely to be present. A dilated IVC with decreased respiratory variation is in keeping with severe TR | |||
| Subcostal (PW) of hepatic veins | Note that there is significant respiratory variation in these parameters, hence averaging over 5 beats should be performed. See BSE Right Heart guideline for explanation of different HV waveforms (1). | ||
| HV systolic reversal waves | As TR severity increases, there is progressive blunting of the HV S wave velocity. Systolic blunting may be seen in greater than mild TR. Note: this is a non-specific finding which is also seen with impaired RV relaxation. Prominent systolic reversal waves (red arrows) are highly sensitive and more specific than systolic blunting for severe TR. |
Transoesophageal echo assessment of the tricuspid and pulmonary valves.
| View (modality) | Explanatory notes | Image |
|---|---|---|
| Mid oesophageal 4-chamber at 0–15º (2D, CFM, CW, PW) | The septal and anterior/posterior leaflets of the TV are imaged in this view (see also Fig. 2 for explanation of imaging planes). Septal-lateral annular dimension can be measured at end-diastole. | |
| Mid oesophageal 5-chamber view at 0–15º (2D, CFM, CW, PW) | Demonstrates the septal and anterior leaflets of the TV (see also Fig. 2 for explanation of imaging planes) | |
| Upper oesophageal at 0–15º (2D, CFM) | If the probe is withdrawn slightly from the mid oesophageal window, the main PA and PA bifurcation can be visualised. Doppler may demonstrate holodiastolic flow reversal in a branch PA in severe PR. | |
| Mid oesophageal, RV inflow-outflow view at 45–60º (2D, CFM, CW, PW) | Demonstrates the anterior or septal TV leaflets adjacent to the aortic valve, and the posterior leaflet laterally. The RVOT, PV and PA are also visualised in this view. | |
| Mid oesophageal, at 90º (2D, CFM) | The RVOT, PV and PA are well visualised in this view | |
| Mid oesophageal modified bicaval view at 80–130º (2D, CFM, CW, PW) | Visualises the posterior and anterior leaflets of the TV. The TR jet is often well-aligned for CW Doppler assessment in this view. PW assessment of TV inflow is also often well-aligned from this view. The superior vena cava (SVC) is seen to the right of the image. The CS is denoted by the red star. | |
| Distal oesophageal, near the gastro-oesophageal junction at 0–15º (2D, 3D, CFM, CW, PW) | From this lower plane only the RA and coronary sinus lie directly in the beam of the probe. This view is therefore ideal for acquiring 3D volumes of the TV without interference from intervening left heart structures. The CS is denoted by the red star. | |
| Transgastric basal SAX view at 90º (2D, CFM) | This is the only 2D imaging plane in which all 3 tricuspid leaflets can be visualised simultaneously. The septal leaflet (S) is closest to the LV. The posterior leaflet (P) is in the near field, and the anterior leaflet (A) is in the far field. | |
| Trangastric RV inflow view, at 80–120º (2D, CFM) | Images the anterior (ant) and inferior (inf) walls of the RV, as well as the papillary muscles, chordae, and TV. The posterior TV leaflet (P) is usually seen in the near field. | |
| Transgastric RV inflow-outflow view, at 100–120º (2D, CFM) | Images the RA, RV, RVOT and PA. The posterior TV leaflet (P) is usually seen in the near field, and the anterior leaflet (A) in the far field. | |
| Deep transgastric RV inflow-outflow view at 100–120º (2D, CFM, CW, PW) | The PV is also well visualised in the deep trangastric window at 120°. Doppler measurements through the PV may be well-aligned in this view. |
Figure 4The influence of driving pressure on apparent regurgitant jet area. The mitral regurgitation jet (top panels) and TR jet (bottom panels) both have a similar jet area. However, the RV driving pressure is much lower than LV pressure, hence the TR is probably more significant than the mitral regurgitation.
Figure 5The use of 3DE in the assessment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Panel A: The anterior (A), posterior (P) and septal (S) leaflets of the tricuspid valve (TV), the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and mitral valve (MV) are displayed. Panel B: Volumetric analysis of the right ventricle (RV). Panel C: Characterisation of the complex structure of the TV annulus. Panel D: 3D colour flow analysis of TR severity.
Figure 63DE of tricuspid valve (TV) leaflet prolapse. The top two images show transthoracic echo biplane imaging of the TV. The top left image (off axis A4C view) is live. The white line represents the position of the scan plane generating a simultaneous view seen in the top right image. The posterior leaflet of the TV is prolapsing and has a chordal rupture resulting in a partially flail segment (red arrow). The bottom left image shows the TV in profile with the flail posterior leaflet (red arrow). The white arrows depict the visible chordae tendinae. The bottom right image shows an en face view of the TV viewed from the right atrial surface. Posterior leaflet prolapse is seen (red arrow). A indicates the anterior TV leaflet; S, septal TV leaflet; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 7Acquisition and display of a three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic dataset of the tricuspid valve.