Literature DB >> 26791838

Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection.

M C Giglio1, D R C Spalding1, A Giakoustidis1, A Zarzavadjian Le Bian1, L R Jiao1, N A Habib1, M Pai1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drain amylase content in the days immediately after major pancreatic resection has been investigated previously as a predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Its accuracy, however, has not been determined conclusively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of drain amylase content on the first day after major pancreatic resection in predicting the occurrence of POPF.
METHODS: A literature search of the MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus(®) databases to 13 May 2015 was performed to identify studies evaluating the accuracy of drain amylase values on day 1 after surgery in predicting the occurrence of POPF. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUChSROC ) was calculated as an index of accuracy, and pooled estimates of accuracy indices (sensitivity and specificity) were calculated at different cut-off levels. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 4416 patients were included. The AUChSROC was 0·89 (95 per cent c.i. 0·86 to 0·92) for clinically significant POPF and 0·88 (0·85 to 0·90) for POPF of any grade. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the different cut-offs: 90-100 units/l (0·96 and 0·54 respectively), 350 units/l (0·91 and 0·84) and 5000 units/l (0·59 and 0·91). Accuracy was independent of the type of operation, type of anastomosis performed and octreotide administration.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of drain amylase content on the first day after surgery is highly accurate in predicting POPF following major pancreatic resection. It may allow early drain removal and institution of an enhanced recovery pathway.
© 2016 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791838     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Seykora; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Major K Lee; Robert Roses; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Perioperative application of somatostatin analogs for pancreatic surgery-current status in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Volk; Philipp Nitschke; Franziska Johnscher; Nuh Rahbari; Thilo Welsch; Christoph Reißfelder; Jürgen Weitz; Marius Distler; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Defining post-operative pancreatitis as a new pancreatic specific complication following pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Evidence Versus Practice in Early Drain Removal After Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Nicole Villafane-Ferriol; Katherine A Baugh; Amy L McElhany; George Van Buren; Andrew Fang; Erisha K Tashakori; Jose E Mendez Reyes; Hop S Tran Cao; Eric J Silberfein; Nader Massarweh; Cary Hsu; Omar Barakat; Carl Schmidt; Nicholas J Zyromski; Mary Dillhoff; Joshua A Villarreal; William E Fisher
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Tsetsegdemberel Bat-Ulzii Davidson; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

6.  The Clinical Implications of Peripancreatic Fluid Collection After Distal Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Jun Yoshino; Daisuke Ban; Toshiro Ogura; Kosuke Ogawa; Hiroaki Ono; Yusuke Mitsunori; Atsushi Kudo; Shinji Tanaka; Minoru Tanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  What are the predictors that can help identify safe removal of drains following pancreatectomy?

Authors:  Emanuel Eguia; Ann E Hwalek; Brendan Martin; Gerard Abood; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Computer tomographic assessment of postoperative peripancreatic collections after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yuichiro Uchida; Toshihiko Masui; Asahi Sato; Kazuyuki Nagai; Takayuki Anazawa; Kyoichi Takaori; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Sequential drain amylase to guide drain removal following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Nicole Villafane-Ferriol; George Van Buren; Jose E Mendez-Reyes; Amy L McElhany; Nader N Massarweh; Eric J Silberfein; Cary Hsu; Hop S Tran Cao; Carl Schmidt; Nicholas J Zyromski; Mary E Dillhoff; Alexandra Roch; Evelyn Oliva; Alexander C Smith; Qianzi Zhang; William E Fisher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Predictors and Outcomes of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Dual Center Experience.

Authors:  Suneed Kumar; Abhijit Chandra; Shibumon M Madhavan; Dinesh Kumar; Smita Chauhan; Anshuman Pandey; Shakeel Masood
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.