Literature DB >> 29478737

Sequential drain amylase to guide drain removal following pancreatectomy.

Nicole Villafane-Ferriol1, George Van Buren1, Jose E Mendez-Reyes1, Amy L McElhany1, Nader N Massarweh1, Eric J Silberfein1, Cary Hsu1, Hop S Tran Cao1, Carl Schmidt2, Nicholas J Zyromski3, Mary E Dillhoff2, Alexandra Roch3, Evelyn Oliva1, Alexander C Smith1, Qianzi Zhang1, William E Fisher4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although used as criterion for early drain removal, postoperative day (POD) 1 drain fluid amylase (DFA) ≤ 5000 U/L has low negative predictive value for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). It was hypothesized that POD3 DFA ≤ 350 could provide further information to guide early drain removal.
METHODS: Data from a pancreas surgery consortium database for pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy patients were analyzed retrospectively. Those patients without drains or POD 1 and 3 DFA data were excluded. Patients with POD1 DFA ≤ 5000 were divided into groups based on POD3 DFA: Group A (≤350) and Group B (>350). Operative characteristics and 60-day outcomes were compared using chi-square test.
RESULTS: Among 687 patients in the database, all data were available for 380. Fifty-five (14.5%) had a POD1 DFA > 5000. Among 325 with POD1 DFA ≤ 5000, 254 (78.2%) were in Group A and 71 (21.8%) in Group B. Complications (35 (49.3%) vs 87 (34.4%); p = 0.021) and CR-POPF (13 (18.3%) vs 10 (3.9%); p < 0.001) were more frequent in Group B.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with POD1 DFA ≤ 5000, POD3 DFA ≤ 350 may be a practical test to guide safe early drain removal. Further prospective testing may be useful.
Copyright © 2018 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29478737      PMCID: PMC5995628          DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  21 in total

1.  Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Sally E Hodges; Meng-Fen Wu; F Charles Brunicardi; Susan G Hilsenbeck; William E Fisher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Paul M Kaminsky; James J Mezhir
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 3.  The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Malleo; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Giorgio Talamini; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  K C Conlon; D Labow; D Leung; A Smith; W Jarnagin; D G Coit; N Merchant; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Persisting ratio of total amylase output in drain fluid can predict postoperative clinical pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Keiichi Okano; Keitaro Kakinoki; Hironobu Suto; Minoru Oshima; Hirotaka Kashiwagi; Naoki Yamamoto; Shintaro Akamoto; Masao Fujiwara; Takehiro Takama; Hisashi Usuki; Masanobu Hagiike; Yasuyuki Suzuki
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.027

7.  Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients.

Authors:  Enrico Molinari; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Stefano Crippa; Giorgio Talamini; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Mark P Callery; Wande B Pratt; Tara S Kent; Elliot L Chaikof; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution.

Authors:  Camilo Correa-Gallego; Murray F Brennan; Michael Dʼangelica; Yuman Fong; Ronald P Dematteo; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage.

Authors:  George Van Buren; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Charles Vollmer; Vic Velanovich; Taylor Riall; Peter Muscarella; Jose Trevino; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Kevin Behrns; E Christopher Ellison; Omar Barakat; Kyle A Perry; Jeffrey Drebin; Michael House; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Eric J Silberfein; Steven Goldin; Kimberly Brown; Somala Mohammed; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Mehdi Issazadeh; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; William E Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Seykora; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Major K Lee; Robert Roses; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Innovations in pancreatic anastomosis technique during pancreatoduodenectomies.

Authors:  S Ferencz; Zs Bíró; A Vereczkei; D Kelemen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.445

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.