Literature DB >> 33814828

Predictors and Outcomes of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Dual Center Experience.

Suneed Kumar1, Abhijit Chandra2, Shibumon M Madhavan1, Dinesh Kumar1, Smita Chauhan1, Anshuman Pandey1, Shakeel Masood1.   

Abstract

Fistula following leaked pancreatico-enteric anastomosis is a common, potentially lethal complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Early assessment and prediction of its occurrence can improve postoperative outcomes. Various perioperative factors were analyzed for its contribution to clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (crPOPF). Also, the difference in clinical outcomes of patients with and without fistula was studied. Sixty-seven patients undergoing PD for malignancies were analyzed during 3-year period in a dual-institutional study. Various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were assessed. The incidence and severity of POPF and its association with the development of other post-PD complications were observed. Patients with and without POPF were divided into groups and compared with univariate and multivariate analyses, to identify significant contributing factors. Clinically relevant POPF was present in 20.9% cases. crPOPF contributed to delayed gastric emptying, albeit insignificant (p = 0.403), but was significantly associated with increased incidence of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhagic (p = 0.005) and infectious complications (p = 0.013). Soft pancreas (p = 0.024), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.045), blood transfusion (p = 0.024), and fistula risk score (p = 0.001) were significant predictors of crPOPF. First postoperative day (POD1) drain fluid amylase (DFA) values at cut-off of 1336 U/L (AUC = 0.871; p < 0.001) significantly predicted crPOPF with good sensitivity and specificity. POD1 DFA was only factor significant on multivariate analysis (p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups. crPOPF results in significant post-pancreatectomy hemorrhagic and septic complications, along with increased mortality. It can be accurately predicted by several preoperative and intraoperative factors. POD1 DFA can independently predict crPOPF development. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinically relevant POPF; Complications; Periampullary cancer; Whipple’s procedure

Year:  2020        PMID: 33814828      PMCID: PMC7960792          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01195-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  29 in total

1.  Duct-to-Mucosa vs Invagination for Pancreaticojejunostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial from a Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Xueli Bai; Qi Zhang; Shunliang Gao; Jianying Lou; Guogang Li; Yun Zhang; Tao Ma; Yibo Zhang; Yuanliang Xu; Tingbo Liang
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the management of pancreatic stump. Literature review.

Authors:  G Conzo; C Gambardella; E Tartaglia; V Sciascia; C Mauriello; S Napolitano; M Orditura; F De Vita; L Santini
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 5.  Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Masillamany Sivasanker; Charles M Vollmer; Helmut Friess; Marc G Besselink; Abe Fingerhut; Charles J Yeo; Carlos Fernandez-delCastillo; Christos Dervenis; Christoper Halloran; Dirk J Gouma; Dejan Radenkovic; Horacio J Asbun; John P Neoptolemos; Jakob R Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; Kevin C Conlon; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Marco Montorsi; Max Bockhorn; Mustapha Adham; Richard Charnley; Ross Carter; Thilo Hackert; Werner Hartwig; Yi Miao; Michael Sarr; Claudio Bassi; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Clamp-crushing pancreas transection in pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Rintaro Koga; Junji Yamamoto; Akio Saiura; Takeshi Natori; Masamichi Katori; Norihiro Kokudo; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

7.  Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients.

Authors:  Enrico Molinari; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Stefano Crippa; Giorgio Talamini; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  J Figueras; L Sabater; P Planellas; E Muñoz-Forner; S Lopez-Ben; L Falgueras; C Sala-Palau; M Albiol; J Ortega-Serrano; E Castro-Gutierrez
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition.

Authors:  Moritz N Wente; Johannes A Veit; Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Abe Fingerhut; Dirk J Gouma; Jakob R Izbicki; John P Neoptolemos; Robert T Padbury; Michael G Sarr; Charles J Yeo; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Pancreaticojejunostomy Versus Pancreaticogastrostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: An Up-to-date Meta-analysis of RCTs Applying the ISGPS (2016) Criteria.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Ting Li; Yunxiao Cheng; Bin Wang; Liang Chen; Sicong Zhao
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.