BACKGROUND: The reproducibility and validity of self-administered questionnaires on physical activity and inactivity were examined in a random (representative) sample of the Nurses' Health Study II cohort and a random sample of African-American women in that cohort. METHODS: Repeat questionnaires were administered 2 years apart. Past-week activity recalls and 7-day activity diaries were the referent methods; these instruments were sent to participants four times over a 1-year period. RESULTS: The 2-year test-retest correlation for activity was 0.59 for the representative sample (n = 147) and 0.39 for the African-American sample (n = 84). Correlations between activity reported on recalls and that reported on questionnaire were 0.79 and 0.83 for the representative and African-American samples, respectively. Correlations between activity reported in diaries and that reported on questionnaire were 0.62 and 0.59, respectively. Test-retest coefficients for inactivity were 0.52 and 0.55, respectively. Correlations between inactivity reported in diaries and that reported on questionnaire were 0.41 and 0.44, respectively. CONCLUSION: The simple, short questionnaires on activity and inactivity used in the Nurses' Health Study II are reasonably valid measures for epidemiological research.
BACKGROUND: The reproducibility and validity of self-administered questionnaires on physical activity and inactivity were examined in a random (representative) sample of the Nurses' Health Study II cohort and a random sample of African-American women in that cohort. METHODS: Repeat questionnaires were administered 2 years apart. Past-week activity recalls and 7-day activity diaries were the referent methods; these instruments were sent to participants four times over a 1-year period. RESULTS: The 2-year test-retest correlation for activity was 0.59 for the representative sample (n = 147) and 0.39 for the African-American sample (n = 84). Correlations between activity reported on recalls and that reported on questionnaire were 0.79 and 0.83 for the representative and African-American samples, respectively. Correlations between activity reported in diaries and that reported on questionnaire were 0.62 and 0.59, respectively. Test-retest coefficients for inactivity were 0.52 and 0.55, respectively. Correlations between inactivity reported in diaries and that reported on questionnaire were 0.41 and 0.44, respectively. CONCLUSION: The simple, short questionnaires on activity and inactivity used in the Nurses' Health Study II are reasonably valid measures for epidemiological research.
Authors: Jinqiu Yuan; Changhua Zhang; Jeffrey A Sparks; Susan Malspeis; Kelvin Kam-Fai Tsoi; Jean H Kim; Benjamin A Fisher; Fang Gao; Tim Sumerlin; Yan Liu; Yuxing Liu; Yihang Pan; Yulong He; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Jeannette M Beasley; Marilyn L Kwan; Wendy Y Chen; Erin K Weltzien; Candyce H Kroenke; Wei Lu; Sarah J Nechuta; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Ruth E Patterson; Barbara Sternfeld; Xiao-Ou Shu; John P Pierce; Bette J Caan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Brian M Wolpin; Kimmie Ng; Ying Bao; Peter Kraft; Meir J Stampfer; Dominique S Michaud; Jing Ma; Julie E Buring; Howard D Sesso; I-Min Lee; Nader Rifai; Barbara B Cochrane; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Rowan T Chlebowski; Walter C Willett; JoAnn E Manson; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Oxana Palesh; Charles Kamen; Susan Sharp; Ashleigh Golden; Eric Neri; David Spiegel; Cheryl Koopman Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Audrey J Gaskins; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Paige L Williams; Thomas L Toth; Stacey A Missmer; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Mengmeng Du; Peter Kraft; A Heather Eliassen; Edward Giovannucci; Susan E Hankinson; Immaculata De Vivo Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 7.396