Literature DB >> 26782721

Group Differences in Regression Intercepts: Implications for Factorial Invariance.

R E Millsap.   

Abstract

Studies of differential prediction typically examine group differences in linear regression slopes or intercepts for predicting criterion scores from one or more test scores. When there are no group differences in slopes, what are the implications of differences in regression intercepts for the measurement equivalence of the tests or criterion across groups? Measurement equivalence is here defined as factorial invariance under a single-factor model for the tests and criterion. Two theorems are given that describe conditions under which intercept differences can exist under factorial invariance. In such cases, intercept differences do not result from measurement bias in either the tests or criterion. The conditions of the theorems are testable using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. These test procedures are illustrated in real data. The implications of the theorems and the test procedures for studies of differential prediction are discussed.

Year:  1998        PMID: 26782721     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3303_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  11 in total

1.  Using the Criterion-Predictor Factor Model to Compute the Probability of Detecting Prediction Bias with Ordinary Least Squares Regression.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Demographic Moderation of the Prediction of Adolescent Alcohol Involvement Trajectories.

Authors:  Nisha C Gottfredson; Blythe E Rhodes; Susan T Ennett
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-08

3.  Validation of a Seven-Factor Structure for the Motives for Playing Drinking Games Measure.

Authors:  Byron L Zamboanga; Shannon Audley; Janine V Olthuis; Heidemarie Blumenthal; Cara C Tomaso; Ngoc Bui; Brian Borsari
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-04-16

4.  Measurement of social support across women from four ethnic groups: evidence of factorial invariance.

Authors:  Sabrina T Wong; David Nordstokke; Steven Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2010-03

5.  Measurement invariance of the kidney disease and quality of life instrument (KDQOL-SF) across veterans and non-veterans.

Authors:  Karen L Saban; Fred B Bryant; Domenic J Reda; Kevin T Stroupe; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Simplifying the implementation of modern scale scoring methods with an automated R package: Automated moderated nonlinear factor analysis (aMNLFA).

Authors:  Nisha C Gottfredson; Veronica T Cole; Michael L Giordano; Daniel J Bauer; Andrea M Hussong; Susan T Ennett
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Capturing Environmental Dimensions of Adversity and Resources in the Context of Poverty Across Infancy Through Early Adolescence: A Moderated Nonlinear Factor Model.

Authors:  Meriah L DeJoseph; Robin D Sifre; C Cybele Raver; Clancy B Blair; Daniel Berry
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  Measurement Invariance of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 Across Gender in a Sample of Chinese University Students.

Authors:  Shan Lu; Shuqing Hu; Yuhuan Guan; Jing Xiao; Dan Cai; Zhihua Gao; Zhiqin Sang; Jie Wei; Xiaochi Zhang; Jürgen Margraf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-31

9.  The Impact of Partial Measurement Invariance on Testing Moderation for Single and Multi-Level Data.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Hsiao; Mark H C Lai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 in Chinese Hospital Workers: Reliability, Latent Structure, and Measurement Invariance Across Genders.

Authors:  Li-Chen Jiang; Ya-Jun Yan; Zhi-Shuai Jin; Mu-Li Hu; Ling Wang; Yu Song; Na-Ni Li; Jun Su; Da-Xing Wu; Tao Xiao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.