Literature DB >> 27519781

Using the Criterion-Predictor Factor Model to Compute the Probability of Detecting Prediction Bias with Ordinary Least Squares Regression.

Steven Andrew Culpepper1.   

Abstract

The study of prediction bias is important and the last five decades include research studies that examined whether test scores differentially predict academic or employment performance. Previous studies used ordinary least squares (OLS) to assess whether groups differ in intercepts and slopes. This study shows that OLS yields inaccurate inferences for prediction bias hypotheses. This paper builds upon the criterion-predictor factor model by demonstrating the effect of selection, measurement error, and measurement bias on prediction bias studies that use OLS. The range restricted, criterion-predictor factor model is used to compute Type I error and power rates associated with using regression to assess prediction bias hypotheses. In short, OLS is not capable of testing hypotheses about group differences in latent intercepts and slopes. Additionally, a theorem is presented which shows that researchers should not employ hierarchical regression to assess intercept differences with selected samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  measurement bias; power; prediction bias; selection; type I error

Year:  2012        PMID: 27519781     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9270-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  14 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.

Authors:  Roger E Millsap; Oi-Man Kwok
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-03

2.  Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing.

Authors:  Herman Aguinis; Steven A Culpepper; Charles A Pierce
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2010-07

3.  Studying Individual Differences in Predictability With Gamma Regression and Nonlinear Multilevel Models.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review.

Authors:  Herman Aguinis; James C Beaty; Robert J Boik; Charles A Pierce
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2005-01

5.  The absence of underprediction does not imply the absence of measurement bias.

Authors:  Jelte M Wicherts; Roger E Millsap
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2009 May-Jun

6.  Multistage selection strategies: simulating the effects on adverse impact and expected performance for various predictor combinations.

Authors:  David M Finch; Bryan D Edwards; J Craig Wallace
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2009-03

7.  Individual differences.

Authors:  L G HUMPHREYS
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1952       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  On the effect of selection performed on some coordinates of a multi-dimensional population.

Authors:  Z W BIRNBAUM; E PAULSON; F C ANDREWS
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: is fair selection possible?

Authors:  Denny Borsboom; Jan-Willem Romeijn; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2008-06

10.  Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper; Herman Aguinis
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Small-scale spatial analysis of intermediate and definitive hosts of Angiostrongylus cantonensis.

Authors:  Qiu-An Hu; Yi Zhang; Yun-Hai Guo; Shan Lv; Shang Xia; He-Xiang Liu; Yuan Fang; Qin Liu; Dan Zhu; Qi-Ming Zhang; Chun-Li Yang; Guang-Yi Lin
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.520

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.