Literature DB >> 26778190

Incorporating patient perspectives in health technology assessments and clinical practice guidelines.

K Hämeen-Anttila1, J Komulainen2, H Enlund3, M Mäkelä4, E Mäkinen4, P Rannanheimo3, R Sipilä2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ensuring patient involvement in health technology assessments (HTAs) and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is important. However, the goals and methods of such involvement are not always clear.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to 1) discover ways to involve patients in HTA and CPG processes, 2) describe challenges, and 3) find ways of informing patients about HTAs and CPGs in Finland.
METHODS: As part of a one-day seminar targeted at representatives of patient organizations (POs), 3, 1-h focus group discussions were held (n = 20, with 14 PO representatives). PO representatives included real patients and health care professionals working in the organizations. The discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.
RESULTS: Focus group participants highlighted the importance of gathering patient views from a group of patients, rather than individuals. Surveys through POs were the most frequently mentioned means of gathering patients' views. PO representatives reported interest in cooperating in HTA and CPG processes. The most often mentioned challenges were finding appropriate representatives for the target group and conveying information about HTAs and CPGs to patients. Multichannel communication was seen as essential. Furthermore the information should be readable, comprehensible, tailored, reliable, reusable, complementary, and timely.
CONCLUSIONS: Possible strategies to involve patients in HTA and CPG processes were incorporating patient representatives in the CPG and HTA groups, offering timely possibility to participate, and ensuring reporting with clear and unambiguous language. The main identified challenge was finding appropriate representatives of the target group. The role of POs was seen as important particularly when informing the patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice guideline; Finland; Focus group discussion; Health technology assessment; Patient perspective; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26778190     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative online survey of self-perceived knowledge and knowledge gaps of medicines research and development among Finnish general public.

Authors:  Mirjami Tran Minh; Manu Tamminen; Jenni Tamminen-Sirkiä; Muntasir Mamun Majumder; Rubina Tabassum; Tuuli Lahti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making.

Authors:  Desmond Curran; Eliazar Sabater Cabrera; Linda Nelsen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fall Prevention and Management for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Manuel M Montero-Odasso; Nellie Kamkar; Frederico Pieruccini-Faria; Abdelhady Osman; Yanina Sarquis-Adamson; Jacqueline Close; David B Hogan; Susan Winifred Hunter; Rose Anne Kenny; Lewis A Lipsitz; Stephen R Lord; Kenneth M Madden; Mirko Petrovic; Jesper Ryg; Mark Speechley; Munira Sultana; Maw Pin Tan; N van der Velde; Joe Verghese; Tahir Masud
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

4.  Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.

Authors:  Maria Dimitrova; Ivett Jakab; Zornitsa Mitkova; Maria Kamusheva; Konstantin Tachkov; Bertalan Nemeth; Antal Zemplenyi; Dalia Dawoud; Diana M J Delnoij; François Houýez; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 5.  Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  K J M O'Donoghue; R D Reed; S R Knight; J M O'Callaghan; A A Ayaz-Shah; S Hassan; P J Morris; L H M Pengel
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 6.  How to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in clinical guidelines: A scoping review.

Authors:  Claire Kim; Melissa J Armstrong; Whitney B Berta; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.377

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.