| Literature DB >> 33606595 |
Desmond Curran1, Eliazar Sabater Cabrera1, Linda Nelsen2.
Abstract
The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration's publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary).Entities:
Keywords: PRO instruments; Patient-reported outcomes; clinical outcomes assessments; comparative effectiveness; electronic PRO; health technology assessment; health-related quality of life; public health benefit; qualitative research; vaccines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33606595 PMCID: PMC8920246 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1875762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother ISSN: 2164-5515 Impact factor: 3.452