Literature DB >> 26776911

Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing.

María Vera-Rodríguez1, Claude-Edouard Michel2, Amparo Mercader3, Alex J Bladon2, Lorena Rodrigo4, Felix Kokocinski2, Emilia Mateu4, Nasser Al-Asmar5, David Blesa4, Carlos Simón6, Carmen Rubio4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect pure and mosaic segmental aneuploidies in trophectoderm biopsies and to identify distribution patterns in whole blastocysts.
DESIGN: Validation study.
SETTING: Reference laboratory. PATIENT(S): Seventy couples with known karyotypes who had undergone preimplantation genetic screening with diagnoses at the blastocyst stage using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Concordance rates for segmental and whole-chromosome aneuploidies determined between aCGH and NGS, and estimates of mosaicism levels of segmental aneuploidies in fixed blastocysts. RESULT(S): We used NGS with amplified DNA from trophectoderm biopsies in which segmental aneuploidies had been previously detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Single-cell fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was then used as an independent form of analysis. The concordance rate between NGS and aCGH was 124 (98.4%) of 126 for the detection of segmental aneuploidies, and 48 (96.0%) of 50 for whole-chromosome aneuploidies. The overall concordance rate was 99.8% (2,276 of 2,280 chromosomes assessed). After FISH analyses with 41.4 ± 24.3 cells per blastocyst, 26 (92.9%) of 28 segmentals detected by aCGH and NGS were confirmed. The FISH analysis did not detect the segmentals in two blastocysts, in which all cells analyzed were euploid. CONCLUSION(S): This is the first report analyzing distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in trophectoderm biopsy by NGS. We have demonstrated that NGS allows the detection of pure and mosaic segmental aneuploidies with the same efficiency as aCGH. The FISH analysis confirmed the existence of these events in the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH); blastocyst; mosaicism; next-generation sequencing; segmental aneuploidy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26776911     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  27 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic testing using Karyomapping for a paternally inherited reciprocal translocation: a case study.

Authors:  C E Beyer; A Lewis; E Willats; J Mullen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Complex preimplantation genetic tests for Robertsonian translocation, HLA, and X-linked hyper IgM syndrome caused by a novel mutation of CD40LG gene.

Authors:  Sexin Huang; Yuping Niu; Jie Li; Ming Gao; Yan Zhang; Junhao Yan; Shuiying Ma; Xuan Gao; Yuan Gao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Yan Hao; Nagwa Elshewy; Xiaoqian Zhu; Zhiguo Zhang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Incidence, Origin, and Predictive Model for the Detection and Clinical Management of Segmental Aneuploidies in Human Embryos.

Authors:  Laura Girardi; Munevver Serdarogullari; Cristina Patassini; Maurizio Poli; Marco Fabiani; Silvia Caroselli; Onder Coban; Necati Findikli; Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Mustafa Bahceci; Rupali Chopra; Rita Canipari; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Ubaldi; Eva Hoffmann; Carmen Rubio; Carlos Simon; Antonio Capalbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-a single-center experience.

Authors:  Jiny Nair; Sachin Shetty; Cynthia Irene Kasi; Nirmala Thondehalmath; Deepanjali Ganesh; Vidyalakshmi R Bhat; Sajana Mannadia; Anjana Ranganath; Rajsekhar Nayak; Devika Gunasheela; Swathi Shetty
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Oocyte competence is independent of the ovulation trigger adopted: a large observational study in a setting that entails vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Cecilia Petriglia; Gemma Fabozzi; Susanna Ferrero; Mauro Schimberni; Cindy Argento; Silvia Colamaria; Maddalena Giuliani; Nicolò Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  A randomized and blinded comparison of qPCR and NGS-based detection of aneuploidy in a cell line mixture model of blastocyst biopsy mosaicism.

Authors:  David Goodrich; Xin Tao; Chelsea Bohrer; Agnieszka Lonczak; Tongji Xing; Rebekah Zimmerman; Yiping Zhan; Richard T Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Evaluation of comprehensive chromosome screening platforms for the detection of mosaic segmental aneuploidy.

Authors:  David Goodrich; Tongji Xing; Xin Tao; Agnieszka Lonczak; Yiping Zhan; Jessica Landis; Rebekah Zimmerman; Richard T Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Recent advances in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Robert Casper; Jigal Haas; Tzu-Bou Hsieh; Rawad Bassil; Chaula Mehta
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.