Literature DB >> 33661465

Oocyte competence is independent of the ovulation trigger adopted: a large observational study in a setting that entails vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer.

Danilo Cimadomo1, Alberto Vaiarelli2, Cecilia Petriglia3, Gemma Fabozzi2, Susanna Ferrero2, Mauro Schimberni4, Cindy Argento2, Silvia Colamaria2, Maddalena Giuliani2, Nicolò Ubaldi5, Laura Rienzi2, Filippo Maria Ubaldi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether the GnRH-agonist or urinary-hCG ovulation triggers affect oocyte competence in a setting entailing vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer.
METHODS: Observational study (April 2013-July 2018) including 2104 patients (1015 and 1089 in the GnRH-a and u-hCG group, respectively) collecting ≥1 cumulus-oocyte-complex (COC) and undergoing ICSI with ejaculated sperm, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, comprehensive-chromosome-testing, and vitrified-warmed transfers at a private clinic. The primary outcome measure was the euploid-blastocyst-rate per inseminated oocytes. The secondary outcome measure was the maturation-rate per COCs. Also, the live-birth-rate (LBR) per transfer and the cumulative-live-birth-delivery-rate (CLBdR) among completed cycles were investigated. All data were adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: The generalized-linear-model adjusted for maternal age highlighted no difference in the mean euploid-blastocyst-rate per inseminated oocytes in either group. The LBR per transfer was similar: 44% (n=403/915) and 46% (n=280/608) in GnRH-a and hCG, respectively. On the other hand, a difference was reported regarding the CLBdR per oocyte retrieval among completed cycles, with 42% (n=374/898) and 25% (n=258/1034) in the GnRh-a and u-hCG groups, respectively. Nevertheless, this variance was due to a lower maternal age and higher number of inseminated oocytes in the GnRH-a group, and not imputable to the ovulation trigger itself (multivariate-OR=1.3, 95%CI: 0.9-1.6, adjusted p-value=0.1).
CONCLUSION: GnRH-a trigger is a valid alternative to u-hCG in freeze-all cycles, not only for patients at high risk for OHSS. Such strategy might increase the safety and flexibility of controlled-ovarian-stimulation with no impact on oocyte competence and IVF efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy testing; Freeze-all; GnRH-agonist; Oocyte competence; Urinary-hCG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33661465      PMCID: PMC8266953          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02124-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  58 in total

1.  A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists.

Authors:  E M Kolibianakis; A Schultze-Mosgau; A Schroer; A van Steirteghem; P Devroey; K Diedrich; G Griesinger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice?

Authors:  P Humaidan; S Kol; E G Papanikolaou
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 3.  Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Mohamed A Youssef; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Wai Sun Lam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-23

4.  Biochemical pregnancy loss after frozen embryo transfer seems independent of embryo developmental stage and chromosomal status.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Pasquale Patrizio; Roberta Venturella; Giovanna Orlando; Daria Soscia; Adriano Giancani; Antonio Capalbo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a "freeze-all" strategy: a prospective multicentric study.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Laura Schultz; Thomas Bauer; Anke Broessner; Thorsten Frambach; Stefan Kissler
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Mohamed A F M Youssef; Fulco Van der Veen; Hesham G Al-Inany; Monique H Mochtar; Georg Griesinger; Mohamed Nagi Mohesen; Ismail Aboulfoutouh; Madelon van Wely
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-31

7.  Similar outcome for cryopreserved embryo transfer following GnRH-antagonist/GnRH-agonist, GnRH-antagonist/HCG or long protocol ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Talia Eldar-Geva; Edit Zylber-Haran; Rachel Babayof; Tamar Halevy-Shalem; Avraham Ben-Chetrit; Avi Tsafrir; Irit Varshaver; Baruch Brooks; Ehud J Margalioth
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 8.  Use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists to trigger ovulation.

Authors:  Clement C K Tay
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.767

9.  Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Filippo Mari Ubaldi; Marcello Iacobelli; Maria Giulia Minasi; Stefania Romano; Susanna Ferrero; Fabio Sapienza; Elena Baroni; Katarzyna Litwicka; Ermanno Greco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Triggering with HCG or GnRH agonist in GnRH antagonist treated oocyte donation cycles: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Anna Galindo; Daniel Bodri; Juan José Guillén; Marta Colodrón; Valérie Vernaeve; Oriol Coll
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  2 in total

1.  Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Gianluca Gennarelli; Maurizio Guido; Carlo Alviggi; Alessandro Conforti; Claudia Livi; Alberto Revelli; Silvia Colamaria; Cindy Argento; Maddalena Giuliani; Carlo De Angelis; Maria Matteo; Stefano Canosa; Angela D'Alfonso; Valentino Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Triggering change in stimulation protocols: a matter of oocyte maturation and beyond.

Authors:  Alexander M Quaas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.