Literature DB >> 18035641

Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge.

Travis R Ricks1, Kandi Jo Turley-Ames, Jennifer Wiley.   

Abstract

The present set of studies examines how working memory capacity (WMC) relates to performance on a Remote Associates Task (RAT), originally designed by Mednick as a quantifiable creative problem solving assessment. The source of fixation was manipulated across two sets of RAT items. One set was neutral with no specific fixation embedded in them, while the second set was baseball-misleading, designed so that prior knowledge of baseball would lead to an incorrect solution attempt. WMC scores were positively related to performance on RAT items in all conditions, except one. High baseball knowledge participants' WMC scores did not relate to performance on the baseball-misleading RAT. While in general WMC may lead to better RAT performance, these results suggest that when there is a candidate solution strongly activated by prior knowledge, WMC may actually lead to too much focus on the incorrect solution and exacerbate mental sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035641     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.

Authors:  A R Conway; N Cowan; M F Bunting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-03

3.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.

Authors:  R W Engle; J Cantor; J J Carullo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Stephen W Tuholski; Oliver Wilhelm; Tabitha W Payne; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-06

5.  How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.

Authors:  S B Green
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The nature of restructuring in insight: an individual-differences approach.

Authors:  Ivan K Ash; Jennifer Wiley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

Review 7.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

8.  The associative basis of the creative process.

Authors:  S A MEDNICK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving.

Authors:  J Wiley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

Review 10.  Long-term working memory.

Authors:  K A Ericsson; W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  Working memory and insight in the nine-dot problem.

Authors:  Jason M Chein; Robert W Weisberg; Naomi L Streeter; Shaleigh Kwok
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Emotional working memory capacity in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Authors:  Susanne Schweizer; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2011-05-27

3.  Working memory and insight in verbal problems: analysis of compound remote associates.

Authors:  Jason M Chein; Robert W Weisberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

4.  Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers.

Authors:  Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10

5.  Creativity and Cognitive Skills among Millennials: Thinking Too Much and Creating Too Little.

Authors:  Brice Corgnet; Antonio M Espín; Roberto Hernán-González
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Differences in the distribution of attention to trained procedure between finders and non-finders of the alternative better procedure.

Authors:  Yuki Ninomiya; Hitoshi Terai; Kazuhisa Miwa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-23

7.  A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019.

Authors:  Ching-Lin Wu; Shih-Yuan Huang; Pei-Zhen Chen; Hsueh-Chih Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.