Neha P Gothe1, Edward McAuley2. 1. Division of Kinesiology, Health, and Sport Studies, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. nehagothe@wayne.edu. 2. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University at Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite yoga's popularity, few clinical trials have employed rigorous methodology to systematically explore its functional benefits compared with more established forms of exercise. The objective of this study was to compare the functional benefits of yoga with the conventional stretching-strengthening exercises recommended for adults. METHODS:Sedentary healthy adults (N = 118; M age = 62.0) participated in an 8-week (three times a week for 1 hour) randomized controlled trial, which consisted of a Hatha yoga group (n = 61) and a stretching-strengthening exercise group (n = 57). Standardized functional fitness tests assessing balance, strength, flexibility, and mobility were administered at baseline and postintervention. RESULTS: A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance showed a significant time effect for measures of balance [F(3,18) = 4.88, p < .01, partial η(2) = .45], strength [F(2,19) = 15.37, p < .001, partial η(2) = .62], flexibility [F(4,17) = 8.86, p < .001, partial η(2) = .68], and mobility [F(2,19) = 8.54, p < .002, partial η(2) = .47]. Both groups showed significant improvements on measures of balance (left-right leg and four square step); strength (chair stands and arm curls); flexibility (back scratch and sit-and-reach); and mobility (gait speed and 8-feet up and go), with partial η(2) ranging from .05 to .47. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that regular yoga practice is just as effective as stretching-strengthening exercises in improving functional fitness. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine functional benefits of yoga in comparison with stretching-strengthening exercises in sedentary, healthy, community-dwelling older adults. These findings have clinical implications as yoga is a more amenable form of exercise than strengthening exercises as it requires minimal equipment and can be adapted for individuals with lower levels of functioning or disabilities.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite yoga's popularity, few clinical trials have employed rigorous methodology to systematically explore its functional benefits compared with more established forms of exercise. The objective of this study was to compare the functional benefits of yoga with the conventional stretching-strengthening exercises recommended for adults. METHODS: Sedentary healthy adults (N = 118; M age = 62.0) participated in an 8-week (three times a week for 1 hour) randomized controlled trial, which consisted of a Hatha yoga group (n = 61) and a stretching-strengthening exercise group (n = 57). Standardized functional fitness tests assessing balance, strength, flexibility, and mobility were administered at baseline and postintervention. RESULTS: A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance showed a significant time effect for measures of balance [F(3,18) = 4.88, p < .01, partial η(2) = .45], strength [F(2,19) = 15.37, p < .001, partial η(2) = .62], flexibility [F(4,17) = 8.86, p < .001, partial η(2) = .68], and mobility [F(2,19) = 8.54, p < .002, partial η(2) = .47]. Both groups showed significant improvements on measures of balance (left-right leg and four square step); strength (chair stands and arm curls); flexibility (back scratch and sit-and-reach); and mobility (gait speed and 8-feet up and go), with partial η(2) ranging from .05 to .47. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that regular yoga practice is just as effective as stretching-strengthening exercises in improving functional fitness. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine functional benefits of yoga in comparison with stretching-strengthening exercises in sedentary, healthy, community-dwelling older adults. These findings have clinical implications as yoga is a more amenable form of exercise than strengthening exercises as it requires minimal equipment and can be adapted for individuals with lower levels of functioning or disabilities.
Authors: William L Haskell; I-Min Lee; Russell R Pate; Kenneth E Powell; Steven N Blair; Barry A Franklin; Caroline A Macera; Gregory W Heath; Paul D Thompson; Adrian Bauman Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J H Flaherty; R Takahashi; J Teoh; J I Kim; S Habib; M Ito; S Matsushita Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Helen Hoenig; Shanti Portia Ganesh; Donald H Taylor; Carl Pieper; Jack Guralnik; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Man-Ying Wang; Gail A Greendale; Sean S-Y Yu; George J Salem Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Keri R Hainsworth; Xue Cheng Liu; Pippa M Simpson; Ann M Swartz; Nina Linneman; Susan T Tran; Gustavo R Medrano; Bryant Mascarenhas; Liyun Zhang; Steven J Weisman Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2018-07-04
Authors: Divya Sivaramakrishnan; Claire Fitzsimons; Paul Kelly; Kim Ludwig; Nanette Mutrie; David H Saunders; Graham Baker Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Ariel J Lang; Anne Malaktaris; Katrina S Maluf; Julie Kangas; Selin Sindel; Matthew Herbert; Jessica Bomyea; Alan N Simmons; Judy Weaver; Deborah Velez; Lin Liu Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-01-28