Literature DB >> 26769471

Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation?

Keitaro Matsukawa1, Yoshiyuki Yato2, Hideaki Imabayashi3, Naobumi Hosogane3, Yuichiro Abe4, Takashi Asazuma2, Kazuhiro Chiba3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has attracted attention as a new minimally invasive technique for lumbar instrumentation by minimizing soft-tissue dissection. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated the superior fixation capacity of CBT; however, there is little consensus on the selection of screw size, and no biomechanical study has elucidated the most suitable screw size for CBT. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of screw size on fixation strength and to clarify the ideal size for optimal fixation using CBT.
METHOD: A total of 720 analyses on CBT screws with various diameters (4.5-6.5 mm) and lengths (25-40 mm) in simulations of 20 different lumbar vertebrae (mean age: 62.1 ± 20.0 years, 8 males and 12 females) were performed using a finite element method. First, the fixation strength of a single screw was evaluated by measuring the axial pullout strength. Next, the vertebral fixation strength of a paired-screw construct was examined by applying forces simulating flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation to the vertebra. Lastly, the equivalent stress value of the bone-screw interface was calculated.
RESULTS: Larger-diameter screws increased the pullout strength and vertebral fixation strength and decreased the equivalent stress around the screws; however, there were no statistically significant differences between 5.5-mm and 6.5-mm screws. The screw diameter was a factor more strongly affecting the fixation strength of CBT than the screw fit within the pedicle (%fill). Longer screws significantly increased the pullout strength and vertebral fixation strength in axial rotation. The amount of screw length within the vertebral body (%length) was more important than the actual screw length, contributing to the vertebral fixation strength and distribution of stress loaded to the vertebra.
CONCLUSIONS: The fixation strength of CBT screws varied depending on screw size. The ideal screw size for CBT is a diameter larger than 5.5 mm and length longer than 35 mm, and the screw should be placed sufficiently deep into the vertebral body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical bone trajectory; Finite element method; Fixation strength; Lumbar pedicle screw; Pullout strength; Screw size

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26769471     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-016-2705-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  21 in total

Review 1.  Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jizhou Wang; Xiaoqi He; Tianwei Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Morphometry of the lower thoracic and lumbar pedicles and its relevance in pedicle fixation.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; M Pai Kanhangad; S N Bhat; S Chawla
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-02-03

3.  Cortical bone trajectory screws for circumferential arthrodesis in lumbar degenerative spine: clinical and radiological outcomes of 101 cases.

Authors:  Nicola Marengo; Pedro Berjano; Fabio Cofano; Marco Ajello; Francesco Zenga; Giulia Pilloni; Federica Penner; Salvatore Petrone; Lorenzo Vay; Alessandro Ducati; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive cortical bone trajectory screws placement via pedicle or pedicle rib unit in the lower thoracic spine: a cadaveric and radiographic study.

Authors:  Jun Xuan; Di Zhang; Hai-Ming Jin; Jiao-Xiang Chen; Dao-Liang Xu; Hong-Ming Xu; Yao-Sen Wu; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The effect of screw tunnels on the biomechanical stability of vertebral body after pedicle screws removal: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Liu; Yu Zhang; Yang Zhou; Xuan-Yin Chen; Shan-Hu Huang; Zi-Kai Hua; Zhi-Li Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Deterioration of the fixation segment's stress distribution and the strength reduction of screw holding position together cause screw loosening in ALSR fixed OLIF patients with poor BMD.

Authors:  Jing-Chi Li; Zhi-Qiang Yang; Tian-Hang Xie; Zhe-Tao Song; Yue-Ming Song; Jian-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-30

7.  A parametric investigation on traditional and cortical bone trajectory screws for transpedicular fixation.

Authors:  Tzu-Tsao Chung; Chen-Lun Chu; Dueng-Yuan Hueng; Shang-Chih Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  The Mismatch Between Bony Endplates and Grafted Bone Increases Screw Loosening Risk for OLIF Patients With ALSR Fixation Biomechanically.

Authors:  Jing-Chi Li; Tian-Hang Xie; Zhuang Zhang; Zhe-Tao Song; Yue-Ming Song; Jian-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-08

9.  Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Schleifenbaum; C Pfeifle; C Oefner; M Edel; N von der Höh; C-E Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Analyzing parsicle screws as a viable alternative to pars screws and pedicle screws for C2 posterior instrumentation fixation.

Authors:  Eric Dilbone; Rishabh Gupta; Byron Stephens
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.