Literature DB >> 29663147

Cortical bone trajectory screws for circumferential arthrodesis in lumbar degenerative spine: clinical and radiological outcomes of 101 cases.

Nicola Marengo1, Pedro Berjano2, Fabio Cofano1, Marco Ajello1, Francesco Zenga1, Giulia Pilloni1, Federica Penner3, Salvatore Petrone1, Lorenzo Vay1, Alessandro Ducati1, Diego Garbossa1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screws for circumferential interbody fusion represents a viable alternative for single-level procedure with reduced invasiveness and less tissue destruction than the traditional technique. In addition, CBT screws have a potentially stronger pullout strength because of the greater amount of cortical bone intercepted. Only few series exist evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes of CBT screws.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients that underwent circumferential lumbar interbody fusion with CBT screws in our institution from 2014 to 2017 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical outcome with visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), radiological data such as fusion, lordosis and muscle trauma, operative blood loss, hospital stay and use of fluoroscopy were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 101 patients undergoing CBT-arthrodesis for degenerative lumbo-sacral disease were reviewed. Mean procedural time was 187 min. The mean operative blood loss and X-ray dose per procedure was 383 ml and 1.60 mg cm2, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 3.47 days. The mean follow-up was 18.23 months. Mean lordosis increment at the treated level was 4.2°. When the follow-up was longer than 12 months (53% of patients), fusion was obtained in 94% of cases. Mean ODI and VAS index improved with statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: This is to our knowledge that the largest available study regarding CBT for circumferential arthrodesis. Results underlined the safety of this technique and the promising clinical and radiological outcomes that will need a longer follow-up. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical bone trajectory; Cortical pedicle screws; Cortical screws; Lumbar interbody fusion; Spinal fixation; Spinal fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663147     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5599-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

1.  Assessment of Paraspinal Muscle Cross-sectional Area After Lumbar Decompression: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Approaches.

Authors:  Lacey E Bresnahan; Justin S Smith; Alfred T Ogden; Steven Quinn; George R Cybulski; Narina Simonian; Raghu N Natarajan; Richard D Fessler; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

2.  Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support.

Authors:  Luis Perez-Orribo; Samuel Kalb; Phillip M Reyes; Steve W Chang; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Pelvic parameters and global spine balance for spine degenerative disease: the importance of containing for the well being of content.

Authors:  Diego Garbossa; Matteo Pejrona; Marco Damilano; Valerio Sansone; Alessandro Ducati; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  R Gejo; H Matsui; Y Kawaguchi; H Ishihara; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory.

Authors:  Keitaro Matsukawa; Yoshiyuki Yato; Hideaki Imabayashi; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Asazuma; Kazuhiro Chiba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-02-19

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study.

Authors:  Keitaro Matsukawa; Yoshiyuki Yato; Hideaki Imabayashi; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Asazuma; Koichi Nemoto
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-07-10

8.  Clinical outcomes and complications associated with pedicle screw fixation-augmented lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Dennis J Rivet; David Jeck; James Brennan; Adrian Epstein; Carl Lauryssen
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-10

9.  Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Khoi D Than; Praveen V Mummaneni; Kelly J Bridges; Stacie Tran; Paul Park; Dean Chou; Frank La Marca; Juan S Uribe; Todd D Vogel; Pierce D Nunley; Robert K Eastlack; Neel Anand; David O Okonkwo; Adam S Kanter; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Significance of the Pars Interarticularis in the Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Technique: An In Vivo Insertional Torque Study.

Authors:  Koshi Ninomiya; Koichi Iwatsuki; Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi; Toshika Ohkawa; Toshiki Yoshimine
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-10-17
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jizhou Wang; Xiaoqi He; Tianwei Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A parametric investigation on traditional and cortical bone trajectory screws for transpedicular fixation.

Authors:  Tzu-Tsao Chung; Chen-Lun Chu; Dueng-Yuan Hueng; Shang-Chih Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  A Clinical Application Study of Mixed Reality Technology Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screws Implantation.

Authors:  Yue Gu; Qingqiang Yao; Yan Xu; Huikang Zhang; Peiran Wei; Liming Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-07-10

4.  Predictors of accurate intrapedicular screw placement in single-level lumbar (L4-5) fusion: robot-assisted pedicle screw, traditional pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory screw insertion.

Authors:  Hua-Qing Zhang; Can-Can Wang; Ren-Jie Zhang; Lu-Ping Zhou; Chong-Yu Jia; Peng Ge; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 2.030

5.  Feasibility of cortical bone trajectory screws for bridging fixation in revision surgery for lumbar adjacent segment degeneration.

Authors:  Long Wang; Yong-Hui Zhao; Xing-Bo Cai; Jin-Long Liang; Hao-Tian Luo; Yu-Long Ma; Yong-Qing Xu; Sheng Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Risk of pedicle and spinous process violation during cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Lilian Zhang; Naifeng Tian; Jian Yang; Wenfei Ni; Liya Jin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.