| Literature DB >> 26768602 |
Caroline Turchetto1, Ana Lúcia A Segatto1, Geraldo Mäder1, Daniele M Rodrigues1, Sandro L Bonatto2, Loreta B Freitas3.
Abstract
The analysis of genetic structure and variability of isolated species is of critical importance in evaluating whether stochastic or human-caused factors are affecting rare species. Low genetic diversity compromises the ability of populations to evolve and reduces their chances of survival under environmental changes. Petunia secreta, a rare and endemic species, is an annual and heliophilous herb that is bee-pollinated and easily recognizable by its purple and salverform corolla. It was described as a new species of the Petunia genus in 2005. Few individuals of P. secreta have been observed in nature and little is known about this species. All the natural populations of P. secreta that were found were studied using 15 microsatellite loci, two intergenic plastid sequences and morphological traits. Statistical analysis was performed to describe the genetic diversity of this rare species and the results compared with those of more widespread and frequent Petunia species from the same geographic area to understand whether factors associated with population size could affect rare species of this genus. The results showed that despite its rarity, P. secreta presented high genetic diversity that was equivalent to or even higher than that of widespread Petunia species. It was shown that this species is divided into two evolutionary lineages, and the genetic differentiation indices between them and other congeneric species presented different patterns. The major risk to P. secreta maintenance is its rarity, suggesting the necessity of a preservation programme and more biological and evolutionary studies that handle the two evolutionary lineages independently. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.Entities:
Keywords: Conservation; genetic diversity; microendemic; microsatellites; plant evolution; plastid sequences
Year: 2016 PMID: 26768602 PMCID: PMC4768524 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plw002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1.Studied species of Petunia from Serra do Sudeste highlighting flowers, habitats and phylogenetic relationship. (A–C) Petunia secreta, (D–F) P. axillaris, (G–I) P. exserta and (J) phylogenetic relationship among these taxa modified from Reck-Kortmann .
Figure 2.Simplified map showing the geographic distribution of collection sites of P. secreta. In detail, Pedra do Segredo locality and the distribution of 12 sampling sites.
Petunia secreta collection sites and plastid haplotype information per population.
| Site | Haplotype | Sample site location | Geographic coordinates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pop1 | 2 | H1 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′45.9″S/53°33′01.3″W |
| Pop2 | 1 | H2 | Pedra do Segredo, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′08.2″S/53°33′10.5″W |
| Pop3 | 1 | H3 | Pedra do Segredo, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′10.3″S/53°33′11.4″W |
| Pop4 | 1 | H2 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′45.7″S/53°33′15.0″W |
| Pop5 | 1 | H4 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′49.7″S/53°33′08.3″W |
| Pop6 | 1 | H2 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′47.5″S/53°32′57.5″W |
| Pop7 | 27 | H1, H6, H7 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′47.5″S/53°32′57.5″W |
| Pop8 | 1 | H5 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′48.8″S/53°33′08.8″W |
| Pop9 | 2 | H2 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′46.4″S/53°32′50.8″W |
| Pop10 | 1 | H2 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′46.3″S/53°32′55.3″W |
| Pop11 | 1 | H2 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′45.8″S/53°32′57.6″W |
| Pop12 | 11 | H1, H8 | Galpão de Pedra, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°32′47.4″S/53°33′03.9″W |
| Pop13 | 15 | H2, H9 | BR290, km 330, Caçapava do Sul/RS | 30°21′18.70″S/53°28′43.00″W |
Figure 3.Evolutionary relationships of plastid haplotypes found in P. secreta. (A) Petunia secreta haplotypes. (B) Petunia secreta, P. axillaris and P. exserta haplotypes. The circles represent haplotypes, and the diameter is proportional to the frequency across 65 analysed individuals.
Genetic diversity of P. secreta based on plastid sequences compared with congeners. N, samples; the numbers in brackets represent private haplotype number; *P < 0.01. 1According to Turchetto . 2According to Segatto . 3Based on clustering analyses (I—Pop1–12; II—Pop13).
| Species | Haplotypes | Tajima's | Fu's | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 359 | 0.21 (0.13) | 0.770 (0.02) | 23 [17] | −0.49 | −2.60 | |
| 197 | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.483 (0.036) | 5 [0] | 0.92 | 1.30 | |
| 50 | 0.15 (0.10) | 0.630 (0.076) | 8 [5] | −0.81 | −5.22* | |
| 15 | 0.05 (0.05) | 0.514 (0.069) | 2 [1] | 1.38 | 1.25 | |
| 65 | 0.17 (0.11) | 0.648 (0.051) | 9 [6] | −0.16 | −1.18 |
Figure 4.Bayesian skyline plot showing the fluctuations in effective population size (Ne) over time. The dark line indicates the median estimate and the grey area represents the 95 % highest posterior density intervals.
Genetic diversity indices based on the microsatellite profile in P. secreta. 1Including all individuals and loci; Chr, microsatellite location (chromosome number); SR, size range; A, number of alleles per locus; PIC, polymorphic index content; AR, allele richness; GD, gene diversity; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; NUL, frequency of null alleles. Bold values represent HWE deviation, significance after Bonferroni correction at P = 0.05.
| Loci | Chr | SR | PIC | AR | GD | NUL (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM188 | I | 100–145 | 11 | 0.83 | 9.38 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.52 | |
| PM195 | I | 184–214 | 7 | 0.57 | 5.12 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.36 | |
| PM101 | I | 237–270 | 7 | 0.59 | 6.41 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| PM21 | II | 89–128 | 3 | 0.38 | 2.56 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.94 | 0.88 | |
| PM88 | II | 142–170 | 7 | 0.64 | 5.77 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.56 | |
| PM183 | III | 102–174 | 11 | 0.65 | 7.42 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| PM191 | III | 164–170 | 3 | 0.44 | 2.98 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.38 | |
| PM8 | IV | 163–187 | 7 | 0.66 | 5.87 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| PM173 | IV | 157–187 | 5 | 0.56 | 4.47 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.34 | |
| PM74 | IV | 186–192 | 2 | 0.06 | 1.81 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.49 | 0.27 |
| PM177 | V | 202–258 | 20 | 0.89 | 14.61 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.65 | 0.48 | |
| PM167 | V | 273–312 | 11 | 0.78 | 8.11 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.43 | |
| PM192 | V | 236–257 | 7 | 0.68 | 6.09 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.46 | |
| PM184 | VII | 90–108 | 7 | 0.45 | 5.06 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.53 | |
| PM206 | IV | 128–132 | 3 | 0.40 | 2.98 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.89 | 0.79 | |
| Average1 | 7.4 | 0.57 | 5.91 | 0.63 | 0.24 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.47 | ||
| Pop1–12 | 6.2 | 0.51 | 5.19 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.40 | |||
| Pop13 | 3.5 | 0.35 | 3.38 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.35 |
Figure 5.Population structure and evolutionary relationships of P. secreta individuals based on 15 microsatellite loci as observed through clustering analyses in the DAPC scatter plot (A) and STRUCTURE (B). Different colours indicate groups (DAPC, K = 5; STRUCTURE, K = 2), and vertical lines correspond to individuals. Neighbour-joining tree (C) obtained from a distance matrix based on shared alleles among individuals and collection sites (Pop13 individuals are presented in grey). Individual numbers according to describe in [see ].
Figure 6.Evolutionary relationships among different Petunia taxa as inferred from microsatellite loci according to the STRUCTURE clustering analysis best K = 3 (A) and K = 4 (B). Each colour represents a genetic component and the vertical lines represent individuals. The P. axillaris and P. exserta genetic profiles were obtained from Turchetto et al. (2015).