| Literature DB >> 31391895 |
Alice Backes1, Geraldo Mäder1, Caroline Turchetto1, Ana Lúcia Segatto1, Jeferson N Fregonezi1, Sandro L Bonatto2, Loreta B Freitas1.
Abstract
Different genetic patterns have been demonstrated for narrowly distributed taxa, many of them linking rarity to evolutionary history. Quite a few species in young genera are endemics and have several populations that present low variability, sometimes attributed to geographical isolation or dispersion processes. Assessing the genetic diversity and structure of such species may be important for protecting them and understanding their diversification history. In this study, we used microsatellite markers and plastid sequences to characterize the levels of genetic variation and population structure of two endemic and restricted species that grow in isolated areas on the margin of the distribution of their respective genera. Plastid and nuclear diversities were very low and weakly structured in their populations. Evolutionary scenarios for both species are compatible with open-field expansions during the Pleistocene interglacial periods and genetic variability supports founder effects to explain diversification. At present, both species are suffering from habitat loss and changes in the environment can lead these species towards extinction.Entities:
Keywords: Atlantic Forest; Pleistocene; Solanaceae; highlands; nuclear diversity; open-field species; plastid variability; rare species
Year: 2019 PMID: 31391895 PMCID: PMC6677564 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plz037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1.(A) Rectangle area corresponds to the geographical distribution of Petunia mantiqueirensis and Calibrachoa elegans. The grey area corresponds to the distribution of other species from both genera; (B) collection sites; (C) Petunia mantiqueirensis flower; and (D) Calibrachoa elegans flower (Photos J. R. Stehmann, UFMG).
Figure 2.Demographic scenarios for Petunia mantiqueirensis and Calibrachoa elegans. The four demographic scenarios tested with the DIYABC approach: 1—constant population; 2—bottlenecked population; 3—expanded population; 4—population with a transitory bottleneck. Demographic parameters: Ne—long-term; Ne2, Ne3 and Ne4—current; Na2 and Na4—pre-bottleneck; Na3 and Nb—during bottleneck; t, time of single demographic change; t2 and t1, beginning and end of bottleneck. Prior values for the parameters are in . The posterior probability (logistic approach with the 8000 closest simulations) of each scenario is given at the bottom.
Genetic diversity indices based on the microsatellite profile in Petunia mantiqueirensis. A, number of alleles per locus; PIC, polymorphic index content; GD, gene diversity; AR, allele richness; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; NUL, frequency of null alleles. *Significant HWE deviation after Bonferroni correction at P = 0.05.
| Locus |
| PIC | GD | AR |
|
|
| NUL (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM8 | 4 | 0.388 | 0.429 | 3.912 | 0.400 | 0.429 | 0.068 | 0.023 |
| PM167 | 7 | 0.582 | 0.619 | 6.621 | 0.667 | 0.619 | −0.077 | −0.057 |
| PM101 | 3 | 0.195 | 0.213 | 2.923 | 0.128* | 0.211 | 0.397 | 0.232 |
| PM117 | 3 | 0.578 | 0.662 | 3.000 | 0.625 | 0.661 | 0.055 | 0.020 |
| PM177 | 3 | 0.232 | 0.251 | 2.998 | 0.175* | 0.250 | 0.302 | 0.159 |
| PM21 | 2 | 0.187 | 0.211 | 2.000 | 0.237 | 0.212 | −0.121 | −0.058 |
| PM184 | 5 | 0.579 | 0.650 | 4.969 | 0.775* | 0.651 | −0.193 | −0.115 |
| PM191 | 3 | 0.055 | 0.057 | 2.600 | 0.029* | 0.057 | 0.500 | 0.410 |
| PM173 | 7 | 0.754 | 0.798 | 7.000 | 0.929* | 0.800 | −0.164 | −0.091 |
| PM63 | 2 | 0.354 | 0.462 | 2.000 | 0.714* | 0.466 | −0.545 | −0.217 |
| Mean | 3.9 | 0.390 | 0.363 | 3.335 | 0.390 | 0.363 | −0.075 | 0.031 |
Characterization of the 10 microsatellites for Petunia mantiqueirensis. All populations values considering pooled populations; N, number of alleles; E, number of private alleles; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient. *Significant HWE deviation after Bonferroni correction at P = 0.05; – not estimated.
| Mant1 | Mant2 | Mant3 | Mant4 | Mant5 | Mant6 | Mant7 | All populations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 27 | 21 | 30 | 14 | 23 | 14 | 14 | 39 |
|
| 3 | – | 3 | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | |
|
| 0.492 | 0.616 | 0.441 | 0.625 | 0.617 | 0.667 | 0.667 | 0.435 | |
|
| 0.579 | 0.667 | 0.524 | 0.875 | 0.667 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.468 | |
|
| −0.033 | −0.130 | −0.199 | −0.750 | −0.109 | −1.000 | −1.000 | −0.075 |
Genetic diversity indices based on the microsatellite profile in Calibrachoa elegans. A, number of alleles per locus; PIC, polymorphic index content; GD, gene diversity; AR, allele richness; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; NUL, frequency of null alleles. *Significant HWE deviation after Bonferroni correction at P = 0.05.
| Locus |
| PIC | GD | AR |
|
|
| NUL (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHE33 | 13 | 0.841 | 0.729 | 8.422 | 0.473* | 0.863 | 0.351* | 0.287 |
| CHE34 | 6 | 0.471 | 0.498 | 4.163 | 0.390* | 0.506 | 0.305* | 0.105 |
| CHE59 | 4 | 0.478 | 0.463 | 3.061 | 0.421* | 0.565 | 0.081 | 0.140 |
| CHE85 | 10 | 0.682 | 0.452 | 5.981 | 0.481* | 0.724 | −0.095* | 0.197 |
| CHE 126 | 6 | 0.668 | 0.547 | 4.983 | 0.254* | 0.721 | 0.604* | 0.488 |
| Mean | 7.8 | 0.628 | 0.538 | 5.322 | 0.404 | 0.676 | 0.249 | 0.243 |
Characterization of the five microsatellites for Calibrachoa elegans. All populations values considering pooled populations; N, number of alleles; E, number of private alleles; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient. *Significant HWE deviation after Bonferroni correction at P = 0.05; – not estimated.
| Eleg1 | Eleg2 | Eleg3 | Eleg4 | All populations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 27 | 10 | 28 | 22 | 39 |
|
| 3 | 2 | 8 | 1 | – | |
|
| 0.653 | 0.241 | 0.653 | 0.630 | 0.675 | |
|
| 0.620 | 0.051 | 0.494 | 0.503 | 0.404 | |
|
| 0.052 | 0.794 | 0.251 | 0.214 | 0.404* |
Posterior parameter estimates based on ABC scenario 2.
| Parameter | Mode | q050 | q950 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ne2 | 534 | 353 | 1330 |
|
| 2000 | 901 | 22 620 | |
| Na2 | 77 200 | 33 200 | 468 000 | |
|
| Ne2 | 4880 | 3180 | 13 000 |
|
| 25 200 | 9030 | 47 400 | |
| Na2 | 477 000 | 36 700 | 483 000 |
Figure 3.Ecological niche modelling for Petunia mantiqueirensis obtained with Maxent. Black dots represent species localities in which the models were based. Colour bars indicate suitability scores represented for P. mantiqueirensis. The coast line in the LGM is indicated by a dotted line.
Figure 4.Ecological niche modelling for Calibrachoa elegans obtained with Maxent. Black dots represent species localities in which the models were based. Colour bars indicate suitability scores represented for C. elegans. The coast line in the LGM is indicated by a dotted line.