Literature DB >> 26767377

Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages.

Juha P Ahtiainen1, Simon Walker2, Heikki Peltonen2, Jarkko Holviala2, Elina Sillanpää3, Laura Karavirta2, Janne Sallinen2, Jussi Mikkola4, Heli Valkeinen5, Antti Mero2, Juha J Hulmi2, Keijo Häkkinen2.   

Abstract

Physical activity recommendations for public health include typically muscle-strengthening activities for a minimum of 2 days a week. The range of inter-individual variation in responses to resistance training (RT) aiming to improve health and well-being requires to be investigated. The purpose of this study was to quantify high and low responders for RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength and to examine possible effects of age and sex on these responses. Previously collected data of untrained healthy men and women (age 19 to 78 years, n = 287 with 72 controls) were pooled for the present study. Muscle size and strength changed during RT are 4.8 ± 6.1 % (range from -11 to 30 %) and 21.1 ± 11.5 % (range from -8 to 60 %) compared to pre-RT, respectively. Age and sex did not affect to the RT responses. Fourteen percent and 12 % of the subjects were defined as high responders (>1 standard deviation (SD) from the group mean) for the RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength, respectively. When taking into account the results of non-training controls (upper 95 % CI), 29 and 7 % of the subjects were defined as low responders for the RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength, respectively. The muscle size and strength responses varied extensively between the subjects regardless of subject's age and sex. Whether these changes are associated with, e.g., functional capacity and metabolic health improvements due to RT requires further studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Individual variation; Muscle hypertrophy; Responders

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26767377      PMCID: PMC5005877          DOI: 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age (Dordr)        ISSN: 0161-9152


  43 in total

1.  Acute and long-term effects of resistance exercise with or without protein ingestion on muscle hypertrophy and gene expression.

Authors:  Juha J Hulmi; Vuokko Kovanen; Harri Selänne; William J Kraemer; Keijo Häkkinen; Antti A Mero
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 3.520

2.  Leptin and leptin receptor genetic variants associate with habitual physical activity and the arm body composition response to resistance training.

Authors:  S Walsh; C J Haddad; M A Kostek; T J Angelopoulos; P M Clarkson; P M Gordon; N M Moyna; P S Visich; R F Zoeller; R L Seip; S Bilbie; P D Thompson; J Devaney; H Gordish-Dressman; E P Hoffman; Thomas B Price; L S Pescatello
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Inter-individual variability in the adaptation of human muscle specific tension to progressive resistance training.

Authors:  Robert M Erskine; David A Jones; Alun G Williams; Claire E Stewart; Hans Degens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.

Authors:  Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Association of interleukin-15 protein and interleukin-15 receptor genetic variation with resistance exercise training responses.

Authors:  Steven E Riechman; G Balasekaran; Stephen M Roth; Robert E Ferrell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-12

6.  Fat mass accumulation compromises bone adaptation to load in Finnish women: a cross-sectional study spanning three generations.

Authors:  Leiting Xu; Patrick Nicholson; Qing-Ju Wang; Qin Wang; Markku Alén; Sulin Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Medium-intensity, high-volume "hypertrophic" resistance training did not induce improvements in rapid force production in healthy older men.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Heikki Peltonen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-04-25

8.  Does habitual dietary intake influence myofiber hypertrophy in response to resistance training? A cluster analysis.

Authors:  Anna E Thalacker-Mercer; John K Petrella; Marcas M Bamman
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.665

9.  Variants of the ankyrin repeat domain 6 gene (ANKRD6) and muscle and physical activity phenotypes among European-derived American adults.

Authors:  Katherine N Van Deveire; Sarah K Scranton; Mathew A Kostek; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Priscilla M Clarkson; Paul M Gordon; Niall M Moyna; Paul S Visich; Robert F Zoeller; Paul D Thompson; Joseph M Devaney; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Eric P Hoffman; Carl M Maresh; Linda S Pescatello
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  Dietary protein and resistance training effects on muscle and body composition in older persons.

Authors:  Wayne W Campbell; Heather J Leidy
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  46 in total

1.  A Method to Stop Analyzing Random Error and Start Analyzing Differential Responders to Exercise.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The Importance of Resistance Exercise Training to Combat Neuromuscular Aging.

Authors:  Kaleen M Lavin; Brandon M Roberts; Christopher S Fry; Tatiana Moro; Blake B Rasmussen; Marcas M Bamman
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Exercise-Induced Myofibrillar Hypertrophy is a Contributory Cause of Gains in Muscle Strength.

Authors:  Christopher B Taber; Andrew Vigotsky; Greg Nuckols; Cody T Haun
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Is Empirical Research on Periodization Trustworthy? A Comprehensive Review of Conceptual and Methodological Issues.

Authors:  José Afonso; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Patrícia Sousa; Isabel Mesquita
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Muscle size and strength: another study not designed to answer the question.

Authors:  Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Resistance training in young men induces muscle transcriptome-wide changes associated with muscle structure and metabolism refining the response to exercise-induced stress.

Authors:  Felipe Damas; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Cleiton A Libardi; Paulo R Jannig; Amy J Hector; Chris McGlory; Manoel E Lixandrão; Felipe C Vechin; Horacio Montenegro; Valmor Tricoli; Hamilton Roschel; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement.

Authors:  Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; J Grant Mouser; Brittany R Counts; Scott J Dankel; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Response Heterogeneity With Exercise Training and Physical Activity Interventions Among Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jessica F Baird; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 9.  Interpreting Adaptation to Concurrent Compared with Single-Mode Exercise Training: Some Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Jackson J Fyfe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Increased rate of force development during periodized maximum strength and power training is highly individual.

Authors:  Heikki Peltonen; Simon Walker; Anthony C Hackney; Janne Avela; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.