Literature DB >> 29511921

Increased rate of force development during periodized maximum strength and power training is highly individual.

Heikki Peltonen1, Simon Walker2, Anthony C Hackney3,4, Janne Avela2, Keijo Häkkinen2.   

Abstract

Maximum strength training induces various improvements in the rate of force development (RFD) on a group level, but no study has investigated inter-individual adaptations in RFD. Fourteen men (28 ± 6 years old) performed the same 10-week maximum strength and then a 10-week power training program. Maximal force and RFD were recorded during maximal isometric leg extension voluntary contractions repeatedly before every 7th training session (2 sessions/week). After the intervention, subjects were retrospectively divided into three groups based on their RFD improvements: (1) improved only during the maximum strength period (MS-responders, + 100 ± 35%), (2) improved only during the power period (P-responders, + 53 ± 27%) or (3) no improvement at all (non-responders, + 3 ± 9%). All groups increased dynamic 1RM equally, but baseline 1RM was greater (p < 0.05) in responder vs non-responder groups. MS-responders had higher electrical stimulation-induced torque at baseline and they improved (+ 35 ± 28%) power production at 50% 1RM load more than P- (- 7 ± 20%, p = 0.052) and non-responders (+ 3 ± 6%, p = 0.066) during the maximum strength training period. MS-responders increased vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (+ 12 ± 9%, p < 0.01) as did P-responders (+ 10 ± 7%, p = 0.07), whereas non-responders were unchanged. Free androgen index (FAI) in responders was higher (+ 34%, p < 0.05) compared to non-responders at baseline. The maximum strength period decreased testosterone (- 17 ± 12; 17 ± 22%), FAI ratio (- 12 ± 14; - 21 ± 23%) and testosterone/cortisol ratio (- 17 ± 25; - 31 ± 20%) in MS and P-responders, respectively. During the P-period hormonal levels plateaued. To conclude, periodized strength training induced different inter-individual physiological responses, and thus RFD development may vary between individuals. Therefore, RFD seems to be a useful tool for planning and monitoring strength training programs for individual neuromuscular performance needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individual response; MVC; RFD; Strength training

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29511921     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3836-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  31 in total

1.  Influence of strength on magnitude and mechanisms of adaptation to power training.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Michael R McGuigan; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  A systems model of training responses and its relationship to hormonal responses in elite weight-lifters.

Authors:  T Busso; K Häkkinen; A Pakarinen; C Carasso; J R Lacour; P V Komi; H Kauhanen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

3.  Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Juha P Ahtiainen; Merja Hoffren; Juha J Hulmi; Mikko Pietikäinen; Antti A Mero; Janne Avela; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Rate of force development as a measure of muscle damage.

Authors:  L Peñailillo; A Blazevich; H Numazawa; K Nosaka
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  The rate of torque development: a unique, non-invasive indicator of eccentric-induced muscle damage?

Authors:  N D M Jenkins; T J Housh; D A Traylor; K C Cochrane; H C Bergstrom; R W Lewis; R J Schmidt; G O Johnson; J T Cramer
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  Inter-individual variability in the adaptation of human muscle specific tension to progressive resistance training.

Authors:  Robert M Erskine; David A Jones; Alun G Williams; Claire E Stewart; Hans Degens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  There Are No Nonresponders to Resistance-Type Exercise Training in Older Men and Women.

Authors:  Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Michael Tieland; Lex B Verdijk; Marika Leenders; Marlou L Dirks; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Luc J C van Loon
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Stress and the neuroendocrine system: the role of exercise as a stressor and modifier of stress.

Authors:  Anthony C Hackney
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-11-01

9.  Endocrine responses to overreaching before and after 1 year of weightlifting.

Authors:  A C Fry; W J Kraemer; M H Stone; B J Warren; S J Fleck; J T Kearney; S E Gordon
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  1994-12

10.  Strength athletes are capable to produce greater muscle activation and neural fatigue during high-intensity resistance exercise than nonathletes.

Authors:  Juha P Ahtiainen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  8 in total

1.  Acute effects of very low-volume high-intensity interval training on muscular fatigue and serum testosterone level vary according to age and training status.

Authors:  T Venckunas; R Krusnauskas; A Snieckus; N Eimantas; N Baranauskiene; A Skurvydas; M Brazaitis; S Kamandulis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The time course of cross-education during short-term isometric strength training.

Authors:  Joshua C Carr; Xin Ye; Matt S Stock; Michael G Bemben; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of Resistance Training Movement Pattern and Velocity on Isometric Muscular Rate of Force Development: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; Cody J Wilson; Pedro E Alcaraz; Jacobo A Rubio-Arias
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effects of supervised high-intensity hardstyle kettlebell training on grip strength and health-related physical fitness in insufficiently active older adults: the BELL pragmatic controlled trial.

Authors:  Neil J Meigh; Justin W L Keogh; Ben Schram; Wayne Hing; Evelyne N Rathbone
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.070

5.  The Impact of Professional Sports Activity on GH-IGF-I Axis in Relation to Testosterone Level.

Authors:  Barbara Morawin; Anna Kasperska; Agnieszka Zembron-Lacny
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb

6.  Velocity-based resistance training: do women need greater velocity loss to maximize adaptations?

Authors:  J Rissanen; S Walker; F Pareja-Blanco; K Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Reliability of hip muscle strength measured in principal and intermediate planes of movement.

Authors:  Basilio A M Goncalves; David J Saxby; Adam Kositsky; Rod S Barrett; Laura E Diamond
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Power Loading-Induced Fatigue Is Influenced by Menstrual Cycle Phase.

Authors:  Heikki Peltonen; Ritva Mikkonen-Taipale; Teemu Uimonen; Simon Walker; Anthony C Hackney; Maarit Valtonen; Heikki Kyröläinen; Johanna K Ihalainen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-03-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.