BACKGROUND: Since 2000 various tobacco control measures have been implemented in the UK. Changes in the smoking status of low and high socioeconomic status (SES) groups in England during this period (2001-08) are explored. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the Health Survey for England general population samples was undertaken. Over 88 000 adults, age 16 or over, living in England were included. Smoking status (current, ex or never) was reported. SES was assessed through a count of seven possible indicators of disadvantage: National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NSSEC), neighbourhood index of multiple deprivation, lone parenting, car availability, housing tenure, income and unemployment. RESULTS: Smoking rates were four times higher among the most disadvantaged [60.7% (95% CI: 58.2-63.3)] than the most affluent [15.3% (95% CI: 14.8-15.8)]. Smoking prevalence declined between 2001 and 2008 except among the multiply disadvantaged. This trend appeared to be due to an increase in never smoking rather than an increase in quitting. Disadvantage declined among non-smokers but not smokers. CONCLUSIONS: In general never smoking and affluence increased in England over this period. The disadvantaged, however, did not experience the decline in smoking and smokers missed out from the increase in affluence. Smoking and disadvantage may increasingly coexist.
BACKGROUND: Since 2000 various tobacco control measures have been implemented in the UK. Changes in the smoking status of low and high socioeconomic status (SES) groups in England during this period (2001-08) are explored. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the Health Survey for England general population samples was undertaken. Over 88 000 adults, age 16 or over, living in England were included. Smoking status (current, ex or never) was reported. SES was assessed through a count of seven possible indicators of disadvantage: National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NSSEC), neighbourhood index of multiple deprivation, lone parenting, car availability, housing tenure, income and unemployment. RESULTS: Smoking rates were four times higher among the most disadvantaged [60.7% (95% CI: 58.2-63.3)] than the most affluent [15.3% (95% CI: 14.8-15.8)]. Smoking prevalence declined between 2001 and 2008 except among the multiply disadvantaged. This trend appeared to be due to an increase in never smoking rather than an increase in quitting. Disadvantage declined among non-smokers but not smokers. CONCLUSIONS: In general never smoking and affluence increased in England over this period. The disadvantaged, however, did not experience the decline in smoking and smokers missed out from the increase in affluence. Smoking and disadvantage may increasingly coexist.
Authors: A E Cavelaars; A E Kunst; J J Geurts; R Crialesi; L Grötvedt; U Helmert; E Lahelma; O Lundberg; J Matheson; A Mielck; N K Rasmussen; E Regidor; M do Rosário-Giraldes; T Spuhler; J P Mackenbach Journal: BMJ Date: 2000-04-22
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Macide Artac; Andrew R H Dalton; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car; Kit Huckvale; Christopher Millett Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Dan Lewer; Martin McKee; Antonio Gasparrini; Aaron Reeves; Cesar de Oliveira Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Mohammad Siahpush; Paraskevi A Farazi; Shannon I Maloney; Danae Dinkel; Minh N Nguyen; Gopal K Singh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Floor A van den Brand; Gera E Nagelhout; Karin Hummel; Marc C Willemsen; Ann McNeill; Onno C P van Schayck Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Eero Lahelma; Olli Pietiläinen; Jane Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Jouni Lahti; Michael Marmot; Ossi Rahkonen; Michikazu Sekine; Martin Shipley; Takashi Tatsuse; Tea Lallukka Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Karin Hummel; Gera E Nagelhout; Marc C Willemsen; Pete Driezen; Linda Springvloet; Ute Mons; Anton E Kunst; Romain Guignard; Shane Allwright; Bas van den Putte; Ciska Hoving; Geoffrey T Fong; Ann McNeill; Mohammad Siahpush; Hein de Vries Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 4.492