Andreas Fuchs1, Mads R Mejdahl2, J Tobias Kühl2, Zara R Stisen2, Emma Julia P Nilsson2, Lars V Køber2, Børge G Nordestgaard3, Klaus F Kofoed4. 1. Department of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark mck601@alumni.ku.dk. 2. Department of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark. 3. Department of Clinical Biochemistry and the Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark. 4. Department of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark.
Abstract
AIMS: Normal values of left ventricular mass (LVM) and cardiac chamber sizes are prerequisites for the diagnosis of individuals with heart disease. LVM and cardiac chamber sizes may be recorded during cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and thus modality specific normal values are needed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 569 healthy subjects undergoing 320-detector CCTA as a part of the Copenhagen General Population Study. LVM as well as ventricular and atrial volumes was assessed with semi-automated software stratified by gender and age decades and indexed by body surface area (BSA). Mean age was 55 (range: 40-84) years, and 188 (33%) were men. BSA-indexed 97.5th percentile cut-off values: LVM = 80 and 65 gr/m(2), left ventricular volume = 97 and 83 mL/m(2), right ventricular volume = 120 and 102 mL/m(2), left atrial volume = 60 and 57 mL/m(2), and right atrial volume = 85 and 73 mL/m(2) for men and women, respectively. Men had greater absolute and indexed LVM and chamber volumes than women. For both genders, indexed ventricular volumes declined, whereas indexed atrial volumes increased in advancing age groups. For men, indexed LVM declined in advancing age groups. In multivariate analyses, gender, BSA, systolic blood pressure, and hard physical activity accounted for 63% of variance in LVM. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional general population study, men have greater indexed LVM and chamber volumes than women, and cardiac indexed volumes vary between age groups in both genders. These findings demonstrate the need for age- and gender-specific normal values for clinical diagnostic purposes. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Normal values of left ventricular mass (LVM) and cardiac chamber sizes are prerequisites for the diagnosis of individuals with heart disease. LVM and cardiac chamber sizes may be recorded during cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and thus modality specific normal values are needed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 569 healthy subjects undergoing 320-detector CCTA as a part of the Copenhagen General Population Study. LVM as well as ventricular and atrial volumes was assessed with semi-automated software stratified by gender and age decades and indexed by body surface area (BSA). Mean age was 55 (range: 40-84) years, and 188 (33%) were men. BSA-indexed 97.5th percentile cut-off values: LVM = 80 and 65 gr/m(2), left ventricular volume = 97 and 83 mL/m(2), right ventricular volume = 120 and 102 mL/m(2), left atrial volume = 60 and 57 mL/m(2), and right atrial volume = 85 and 73 mL/m(2) for men and women, respectively. Men had greater absolute and indexed LVM and chamber volumes than women. For both genders, indexed ventricular volumes declined, whereas indexed atrial volumes increased in advancing age groups. For men, indexed LVM declined in advancing age groups. In multivariate analyses, gender, BSA, systolic blood pressure, and hard physical activity accounted for 63% of variance in LVM. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional general population study, men have greater indexed LVM and chamber volumes than women, and cardiac indexed volumes vary between age groups in both genders. These findings demonstrate the need for age- and gender-specific normal values for clinical diagnostic purposes. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Louise Hindsø; Andreas Fuchs; Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Emma Julia P Nilsson; Per Ejlstrup Sigvardsen; Lars Køber; Børge G Nordestgaard; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Stefan Stender; Eriks Smagris; Bo K Lauridsen; Klaus F Kofoed; Børge G Nordestgaard; Anne Tybjaerg-Hansen; Len A Pennacchio; Diane E Dickel; Jonathan C Cohen; Helen H Hobbs Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Aseem Pradhan; John Scaringi; Patrick Gerard; Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky; Ethan Kung Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 2.305
Authors: Keva Garg; Toral R Patel; Arjun Kanwal; Todd C Villines; Niti R Aggarwal; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha; Pamela S Douglas; Leslee J Shaw; Garima Sharma Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2021-10-08
Authors: Borek Foldyna; Roman Zeleznik; Parastou Eslami; Thomas Mayrhofer; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Maros Ferencik; Daniel O Bittner; Nandini M Meyersohn; Stefan B Puchner; Hamed Emami; Patricia A Pellikka; Hugo J W L Aerts; Pamela S Douglas; Michael T Lu; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Steffen E Petersen; Nay Aung; Mihir M Sanghvi; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Jane M Francis; Mohammed Y Khanji; Elena Lukaschuk; Aaron M Lee; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Paul Leeson; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Andreas Ronit; Thomas Kristensen; Yunus Çolak; Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Anna Kalhauge; Peter Lange; Børge G Nordestgaard; Jørgen Vestbo; Susanne D Nielsen; Klaus F Kofoed Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2018-10-11